Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:41:58.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards Pedagogies of Mathematics Achievement: An Analysis of Learning Advisers' Approaches to the Tutoring of Mathematics in the Indigenous Tertiary Entry Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Jonathan Makuwira
Jonathan Makuwira*
Affiliation:
School of Global Studies, Social Science and Planning, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia
Get access

Abstract

This research examined different ways in which tutors of mathematics approach their tutoring among Indigenous students enrolled in the Tertiary Entry Program (TEP) at Central Queensland University's Indigenous Learning, Spirituality and Research Centre. The study sought to establish whether or not there were any differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous tutors' approaches to tutoring and, document challenges and opportunities in tutoring mathematics to Indigenous students. Using qualitative data obtained from interviews, the study raised more questions than answers. The results reflect tutors' own teaching orientations. This is particularly clear when all of the tutors who participated in this study were NOT mathematics trained teachers but had either taken interest in the subject as a result of doing a mathematics-related subject such as engineering and science. Overall, there was consensus that establishing rapport between the students and Learning Advisers was crucial. Knowing who the students are and, vice versa, was also considered fundamental. For some, it was an acknowledgment that both the tutor and the student were on a discovery journey. The majority of the tutors prefer a process where a mathematical concept was explained first, followed by an application of real life situations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , 2008 , pp. 48 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, B. E. (2004). Enhancing the quality of graduate student instruction: The Teaching Assistant Project (TAP). In Ruben, B. D. (Ed.), Pursuing excellence in higher education (pp. 264–271). San Fransisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. J. (2002). Critical challenges in researching cultural issues in mathematics education. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 119–131.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. J., Baturo, A. R., & Warren, E. (2005). Indigenous and non-Indigenous teaching relationships in three Mathematics classrooms in remote Queensland. Retrieved 4 April, 2006, from http://eprint.qut.edu.au/archive/00003619.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B. (2000, May). Raising the achievements of low-performing students. Paper presented at the Mid-Continent Research for Educational Learning, Aurora, Colorado.Google Scholar
Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, P. (1998, November). Contextual issues related to Aboriginal children's mathematical learning. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Retrieved 4 May, 2006, from http://www.aare.edu.au/98pap/how98283.htm.Google Scholar
Makuwira, J. J. (1997). Some factors affecting newly qualified teachers' understanding of mathematics and its teaching in primary schools in Malawi. Unpublished Master of Philosophy thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottinghan.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. (2000). An exploration of teacher and tutor complementation during an in-class tutorial program for Indigenous students in a primary school. Honours thesis, James Cook University, Townsville.Google Scholar
McLean, M. (n.d.). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mathematics learning. Retrieved 20 August, 2006, from http://www.faess.jcu.edu.au/downloads/McLean.Google Scholar
Meaney, T. (2002). Symbiosis or cultural clash? Indigenous students learning maihemstics. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meel, D. E. (n.d.). A case study of adjustment: Looking at a graduate teaching assistant's struggles. Retrieved 20 August, 2006, from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/meel.pdf.Google Scholar
Michie, M. (n.d.). Lost in a sea of literacy: Numeracy and Indigenous adults. Retrieved 5 May, 2006, from http://members.ozemail.com.au/~mmichie/ost.htm.Google Scholar
Nichol, R., & Robinson, J. (1998). Building bridges between Aboriginal and Western mathematics: Creating an effective mathematics learning environment. Retrieved 9 May, 2006, from http://www.latrobe.edu.au/graded/pJRed2.html.Google Scholar
Nichol, R., & Robinson, J. (1999). Reconciling Indigenous pedagogy and SOSE. Ethos, 2(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
Nichol, R., & Robinson, J. (2000). Pedagogical challenges in making mathematics relevant for Indigenous Australians. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(4), 495–504.Google Scholar
Pruitt, A. S. (1997). Preparing future faculty program and teaching assistant training: Building bridges. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities and Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar
Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. (2002). The relevance of the ‘Learning Styles Debate’ for Australian Indigenous students in mainstream education. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 30(2) 13–19.Google Scholar
Warren, E., Cooper, T. J., & Baturo, A. (2004). Indigenous students and mathematics: Teachers' perceptions of the role of teacher aides. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 33, 37–46.Google Scholar