Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:38:25.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Keith Hitchins
Affiliation:
Rice University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Knatchbull-Hugessen, C. M., The Political Evolution of the Hungarian Nation (2 vols., London, 1908), Vol. I, p. 65Google Scholar. In many respects, however, the constitutional equality of all noblemen was but a legal fiction. The Chamber of Magnates separated from the Chamber of Estates, which represented the common nobility, in 1608 and developed into the upper house of the diet. In practice, there was quite a difference between a Hungarian aristocrat and a member of the lesser nobility. See Harold, Steinacker, Zur Frage nach der rechtlichen Natur der Osterreichischungarischen Gesamtmonarchie (Vienna, n. d.), p. 31.Google Scholar

2 Jászi, , The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy, pp. 298–299Google Scholar. See also Macartney, C. A., Hungary (London, 1934), pp. 6668.Google Scholar

3 For a complete text, see Marczali, Enchiridion, pp. 765–766. An English translation is available in Knatchbull-Hugessen, , The Political Evolution of the Hungarian Nation, Vol. I, pp. 233234.Google Scholar

4 Marczali, , Hungary in the Eighteenth Century, p. 316Google Scholar. See also Steinacker, , Zur Frage der rechtlichen Natur, pp. 2429.Google Scholar