No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Alternatives and defaults: Knobe's two explanations of how moral judgments influence intuitions about intentionality and causation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2010
Abstract
Knobe cites both relevant alternatives and defaults on a continuum to explain how moral judgments influence intuitions about certain apparently non-moral notions. I ask (1) how these two accounts are related, (2) whether they exclude or supplement supposedly competing theories, and (3) how to get positive evidence that people consider relevant alternatives when applying such notions.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008) A contrastivist manifesto. Social Epistemology
22(3):257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar