Article contents
Blindsight, orgasm, and representational overlap
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
It is argued that there is no fallacy in the reasoning in the example of the thirsty blindsight subject, on one reconstruction of that reasoning. Neither the case of orgasm nor the case of a visual versus an auditory experience as of something overheard shows that phenomenal content is not representational.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
- 7
- Cited by