Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:40:18.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common mistakes about numerical representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2009

Mauro Pesenti
Affiliation:
Unité de Neurosciences Cognitives, Département de Psychologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. mauro.pesenti@uclouvain.behttp://www.nesc.ucl.ac.be/mp/pesentiHomepage.htmmichael.andres@uclouvain.behttp://www.nesc.ucl.ac.be/recherche/projects/number.htm
Michael Andres
Affiliation:
Unité de Neurosciences Cognitives, Département de Psychologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. mauro.pesenti@uclouvain.behttp://www.nesc.ucl.ac.be/mp/pesentiHomepage.htmmichael.andres@uclouvain.behttp://www.nesc.ucl.ac.be/recherche/projects/number.htm

Abstract

Cohen Kadosh & Walsh (CK&W) argue that recent findings challenge the hypothesis of abstract numerical representations. Here we show that because, like many other authors in the field, they rely on inaccurate definitions of abstract and non-abstract representations, CK&W fail to provide compelling evidence against the abstract view.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. (1976) Language, memory, and thought. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. & Bower, G. M. (1973) Human associative memory. Winston.Google Scholar
Banks, W. P. (1977) Encoding and processing of symbolic information in comparative judgments. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 11, ed. Bower, G. H., pp. 101–59. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C. & Romani, C. (1990) The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology 7(3):161–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen Kadosh, R., Henik, A., Rubinsten, O., Mohr, H., Dori, H., Van de Ven, V., Zorzi, M., Hendler, T., Goebel, R. & Linden, D. E. J. (2005) Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia 43:1238–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S. (1992) Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 44:142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G. & Cohen, L. (1998a) Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neurosciences 21:355–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B. & Fias, W. (2006c) Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32:3244.Google ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M. & Reiser, B. J. (1978) Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4:4760.Google ScholarPubMed
McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A. & Basili, A. (1985) Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia. Brain and Cognition 4:171–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S. E. (1978) Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In: Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Human information processing, ed. Estes, W. K.. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973) What the mind's eyes tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin 80(1):124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1978) Imagery and artificial intelligence. In: Perception and cognition. Issues in the foundations of psychology, vol. 9, ed. Savage, C. W., pp. 1955. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981) The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review 88:1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Coltheart, M. & Funnell, E. (1988) Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence re-examined. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5(1):325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. & Podgorny, P. (1978) Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In: Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Human information processing, ed. Estes, W. K.. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1978) On the form of mental representation. In: Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundation of psychology, vol. 9, ed. Savage, C. W., pp. 318. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Verguts, T. & Fias, W. (2004) Representation of number in animals and humans: A neural model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(9):1493–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K. & Umiltà, C. (2002) Neglect disrupts the number line. Nature 417:138–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed