Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:07:39.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural evolutionary theory is not enough: Ambiguous culture, neglect of structure, and the absence of theory in behavior genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Callie H. Burt Open the ORCID record for Callie H. Burt [Opens in a new window]
Callie H. Burt*
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies & Center for Research on Interpersonal Violence (CRIV), Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. cburt@gsu.eduwww.callieburt.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uchiyama et al. propose a unified model linking cultural evolutionary theory to behavior genetics (BG) to enhance generalizability, enrich explanation, and predict how social factors shape heritability estimates. A consideration of culture evolution is beneficial but insufficient for purpose. I submit that their proposed model is underdeveloped and their emphasis on heritability estimates misguided. I discuss their ambiguous conception of culture, neglect of social structure, and the lack of a general theory in BG.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e157
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Belsky, D. W., Domingue, B. W., Wedow, R., Arseneault, L., Boardman, J. D., Caspi, A., … Herd, P. (2018). Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(31), E7275–E7284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, D. W., Moffitt, T. E., Corcoran, D. L., Domingue, B., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., … Williams, B. S. (2016). The genetics of success: How single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment relate to life-course development. Psychological Science, 27(7), 957–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, C. H. (2018). Racial discrimination and cultural adaptations: An evolutionary developmental approach. Advances in Criminological Theory: Building a Black Criminology, 24, 207–252.Google Scholar
Burt, C. H., & Simons, R. L. (2014). Pulling back the curtain on heritability studies: Biosocial criminology in the postgenomic era. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 52(2), 223–262.Google Scholar
Carter, P. L. (2003). “Black” cultural capital, status positioning, and schooling conflicts for low-income African American youth. Social Problems, 50(1), 136–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannerz, U. (1969). Soulside: Inquiries into ghetto culture and community. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Massey, D., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, O., & Fosse, E. (Eds.). (2015). The cultural matrix: Understanding black youth. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 189–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2011). Commentary: Variation and causation in the environment and genome. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 598–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, W. J. (2010). Why both social structure and culture matter in a holistic analysis of inner-city poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar