Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:29:49.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does TEC explain the emergence of distal representations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2005

Mark Siebel
Mark Siebel*
Affiliation:
Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of Leipzig, 04107Leipzig, Germanyhttp://www.uni-leipzig.de/~logik
*
siebel@uni-leipzig.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Hommel et al. (2001) try to explain the emergence of distal representations by an evolutionary account which includes their theory of event coding. A closer look at the way the terms “distal representations” and “representations of events” are defined reveals, however, that their hypothesis of a common code for perceived and to-be-produced events is in fact superfluous. Moreover, it shows that they mix up empirical facts with conceptual/definitional facts in the second assumption of their explanation.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , August 2004 , pp. 588 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Commentary onBernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben, & Wolfgang Prinz (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. BBS 24(5):849–878.

References

Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5):849–78. [MS]Google Scholar