Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:11:13.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic complexities and cognitive hurdles: Accounting for specific economic misconceptions without an ultimate cause

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

David Leiser  and
Yhonatan Shemesh
David Leiser
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva 8410501, Israel. dleiser@bgu.ac.ilshemeyh@bgu.ac.ilwww.bgu.ac.il/~dleiser
Yhonatan Shemesh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva 8410501, Israel. dleiser@bgu.ac.ilshemeyh@bgu.ac.ilwww.bgu.ac.il/~dleiser
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do folk-economic beliefs have an ultimate cause? We argue that, in many cases, the answer is negative. Cognition is constrained in both scope (via long-term memory [LTM]) and depth (via working memory [WM]). Consequently, laypeople are challenged by concepts essential for understanding complex systems, economics included: aggregation, indirect causation, and equilibrium. We discuss several economic misconceptions arising from this acute mismatch.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chi, M., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M. & Chase, C. C. (2012) Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science 36(1):1–61.Google Scholar
DiSessa, A. A. (2006) A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranton, G. & Turner, M. A. (2011) The fundamental law of road congestion: Evidence from US cities. American Economic Review 101(6):2616–52. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2616.Google Scholar
Halford, G. S., Cowan, N. & Andrews, G. (2007) Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(6):236–42.Google Scholar
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H. & Phillips, S. (1998) Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(6):803–64.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996) Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In: Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, ed. Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A., pp. 133–68. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Leiser, D. (2001) Scattered naive theories: Why the human mind is isomorphic to the internet web. New Ideas in Psychology 19(3):175–202.Google Scholar
Leiser, D. & Shemesh, Y. (2018) How we misunderstand economics and why it matters: The psychology of bias, distortion and conspiracy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O. & Sander, N. (2007) Individual differences in working memory capacity and reasoning ability. In: Variation in working memory, ed. Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A. & Towse, J. N., pp. 49–75: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O. & Wittman, W. W. (2003) The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence 31(2):167–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0.Google Scholar
Shtulman, A. (2015) How lay cognition constrains scientific cognition. Philosophy Compass 10(11):785–98.Google Scholar