Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T12:29:44.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human motivation is organized hierarchically, from proximal (means) to ultimate (ends)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Edgar Dubourg*
Affiliation:
Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole normale supérieure, Université PSL, EHESS, CNRS, Paris, France edgar.dubourg@gmail.com valerian.chambon@ens.psl.eu nicolas.baumard@gmail.com https://www.edgardubourg.fr https://nicolasbaumards.org https://sites.google.com/site/chambonvalerian/home
Valérian Chambon
Affiliation:
Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole normale supérieure, Université PSL, EHESS, CNRS, Paris, France edgar.dubourg@gmail.com valerian.chambon@ens.psl.eu nicolas.baumard@gmail.com https://www.edgardubourg.fr https://nicolasbaumards.org https://sites.google.com/site/chambonvalerian/home
Nicolas Baumard
Affiliation:
Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole normale supérieure, Université PSL, EHESS, CNRS, Paris, France edgar.dubourg@gmail.com valerian.chambon@ens.psl.eu nicolas.baumard@gmail.com https://www.edgardubourg.fr https://nicolasbaumards.org https://sites.google.com/site/chambonvalerian/home
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Murayama and Jach raise a key problem in behavioral sciences, to which we suggest evolutionary science can provide a solution. We emphasize the role of adaptive mechanisms in shaping behavior and argue for the integration of hierarchical theories of goal-directed cognition and behavioral flexibility, in order to unravel the motivations behind actions that, in themselves, seem disconnected from adaptive goals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Shawaf, L. (2024). Levels of analysis and explanatory progress in psychology: Integrating frameworks from biology and cognitive science for a more comprehensive science of the mind. Psychological Review. https://sites.google.com/site/chambonvalerian/home https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Shawaf, L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2024). The Oxford handbook of evolution and the emotions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, J.-B., Debove, S., Fitouchi, L., & Baumard, N. (2022). Moral cognition as a Nash product maximizer: An evolutionary contractualist account of morality. [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2hxguCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N., Fitouchi, L., André, J.-B., Nettle, D., & Scott-Philipps, T. (2024). The gene's-eye view of culture. To Appear in the Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/6303/Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, J., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Schulz, L. E. (2024). In praise of folly: Flexible goals and human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(7), 628642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.03.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2023). Motivation, emotion, and personality: Steps to an evolutionary synthesis. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3ry7bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diefendorff, J. M., & Seaton, G. A. (2015). Work motivation. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 680686). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.22036-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 2036. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddu, M. K., & Gopnik, A. (2024). The development of human causal learning and reasoning. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(5), 319339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00300-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höchli, B., Brügger, A., & Messner, C. (2018). How focusing on superordinate goals motivates broad, long-term goal pursuit: A theoretical perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelso, J. A. S. (2016). On the self-organizing origins of agency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 490499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murayama, K. (2022). A reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition: An integrated account of curiosity, interest, and intrinsic–extrinsic rewards. Psychological Review, 129(1), 175198. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellis, S. M., Pellis, V. C., Pelletier, A., & Leca, J.-B. (2019). Is play a behavior system, and, if so, what kind? Behavioural Processes, 160, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.12.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sell, A., & Sznycer, D. (2024). The recalibrational theory: Anger as a bargaining emotion. In Al-Shawaf, L. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolution and the emotions (pp. 135144). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544754.013.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigaud, O., Baldassarre, G., Colas, C., Doncieux, S., Duro, R., Perrin-Gilbert, N., & Santucci, V. G. (2024). A definition of open-ended learning problems for goal-conditioned agents (arXiv:2311.00344). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00344Google Scholar
Singh, M. (2022). Subjective selection and the evolution of complex culture. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 31(6), 266280. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21948CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sznycer, D. (2022). Value computation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(5), 367380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sznycer, D., Al-Shawaf, L., Bereby-Meyer, Y., Curry, O. S., De Smet, D., Ermer, E., … Tooby, J. (2017). Cross-cultural regularities in the cognitive architecture of pride. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 18741879. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614389114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sznycer, D., Xygalatas, D., Agey, E., Alami, S., An, X.-F., Ananyeva, K. I., … … Tooby, J. (2018). Cross-cultural invariances in the architecture of shame. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), 97029707. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805016115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2022). The evolution of agency: Behavioral organization from lizards to humans. The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance, 30(1/2), 6. https://doi.org/10.2307/3685502Google Scholar
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D., & Sznycer, D. (2008). Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In Elliot, A. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 251271). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888148.ch15Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 3557. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, A., & Huber, L. (2012). Cold-blooded cognition: Reptilian cognitive abilities. In Vonk, J. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology (pp. 129143). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-04454-008CrossRefGoogle Scholar