Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:59:53.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influences on the development of imaginary worlds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2022

Mark J. P. Wolf*
Affiliation:
Communication Department, Concordia University Wisconsin, Mequon, WI 53097, USA mark.wolf@cuw.edu

Abstract

Dubourg and Baumard's paper takes a different, and fruitful, approach to the study of imaginary worlds than what is usually found in Media Studies, but omits certain circumstances and influences that shaped their history; this article argues that psychological or behavioral factors are not enough to explain the growth of imaginary worlds, even as they may be important influences.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wolf, M. J. P. (2013). Building imaginary worlds: The theory and history of subcreation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. J. P. (2017a). Beyond immersion: Absorption, saturation, and overflow in the experiencing of imaginary worlds. In Boni, M. (Ed.), World building: Transmedia, fans, industries (pp. 204214). Amsterdam University Press and University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. J. P. (2017b). The importance of overflow and chunking in world-building and the experiencing of worlds. In Revisiting imaginary worlds: A subcreation studies anthology (pp. 264275). Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. J. P. (2020). Appendix: On measuring and comparing imaginary worlds. In Exploring imaginary worlds: Essays on media, structure, and subcreation (pp. 225232). Routledge.Google Scholar