Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:57:44.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The missing chapter: The interaction between behavioral and symbolic inheritance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2007

Anne S. Warlaumont
Affiliation:
School of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38105
Rick Dale
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. anne.warlaumont@memphis.eduradale@memphis.eduhttp://cia.psyc.memphis.edu/rad/

Abstract

A strength of Jablonka & Lamb's (J&L's) book lies in its accessible as well as thorough treatment of genetic and epigenetic inheritance. The authors also provide a stimulating framework integrating evolutionary research across disciplines. A weakness is its unsystematic treatment of the interaction between behavioral and symbolic inheritance, particularly in their discussion of language.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979) The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82:711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M. M. (1991) Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language 67:297319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, A. J. & Fifer, W. P. (1980) Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science 208:1174–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeCasper, A. J. & Prescott, P. A. (1984) Human newborns' perception of male voices: Preference, discrimination, and reinforcing value. Developmental Psychobiology 17:481–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P. & West, M. J. (2003) Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:8030–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, M. H. & West, M. J. (1999) Consistent responses of human mothers to prelinguistic infants: The effect of prelinguistic repertoire size. Journal of Comparative Psychology 113:5258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kisilevsky, B. S., Hains, S. M. J., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., Zhang, K. & Wang, Z. (2003) Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science 14:220–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. (1988) Imitation, objects, tools, and the rudiments of language in human ontogeny. Human Evolution 3:4564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198:7578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, R., Werker, J. F. & Morgan, J. L. (1999) Newborn infants' sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition 72:1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Barton, M. (1994) Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology 30:639–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1966) The development and generalization of contingency awareness in early infancy: Some hypotheses. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 12:123–35.Google Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1985) Contingency perception in early social development. In: Social perception in infants, ed. Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A., pp. 157–76. Ablex.Google Scholar