Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Schultz, Johannes
and
Hurlemann, René
2018.
Characterising variations in perceptual decision making.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 41,
Issue. ,
Tillman, Rachael
Gordon, Ilanit
Naples, Adam
Rolison, Max
Leckman, James F.
Feldman, Ruth
Pelphrey, Kevin A.
and
McPartland, James C.
2019.
Oxytocin Enhances the Neural Efficiency of Social Perception.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
Vol. 13,
Issue. ,
Hagtvedt, Henrik
2019.
Shared Aesthetics: A Commentary on Collaborative Art.
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 4,
p.
336.
Daniels, Nicky
Prinsen, Jellina
Soriano, Javier R.
and
Alaerts, Kaat
2020.
Oxytocin enhances the recovery of eye-contact induced autonomic arousal: A treatment mechanism study with placebo-controlled design.
European Neuropsychopharmacology,
Vol. 39,
Issue. ,
p.
87.
Zhang, Ling
Chen, Wenfeng
Liu, Menghan
Ou, Yuxiao
Xu, Erjia
and
Hu, Ping
2021.
Light makeup decreases receivers’ negative emotional experience.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Taheran, Faegheh
Thomas, Veronica L.
Fowler, Kendra
and
Mortazavi, Abdolali
2024.
Understanding the application of evolutionary psychology in consumer behavior: A review and future research agenda.
Psychology & Marketing,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 10,
p.
2431.
Target article
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Related commentaries (25)
An assessment of the mating motive explanation of the beauty premium in market-based settings
Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases
Attentional and affective biases for attractive females emerge early in development
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation
Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets
Context matters for attractiveness bias
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation
Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?
It is not all about mating: Attractiveness predicts partner value across multiple relationship domains
Just My Imagination: Beauty premium and the evolved mental model
Mating motives are neither necessary nor sufficient to create the beauty premium
Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people
Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling
Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases
The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives
The out-of-my-league effect
The type of behavior and the role of relationship length in mate choice for prosociality among physically attractive individuals
The wolf will live with the lamb
There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration
Tinbergen's “four questions” provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis
What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias?
Author response
Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases