Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:12:18.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Questions about networks, measurement, and causation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2010

Keith A. Markus
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10019. kmarkus@aol.comhttp://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~kmarkus

Abstract

Cramer et al. present a thoughtful application of network analysis to symptoms, but certain questions remain open. These questions involve the intended causal interpretation, the critique of latent variables, individual variation in causal networks, Borsboom's idea of networks as measurement models, and how well the data support the stability of the network results.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bollen, K. A. (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2008) Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology 64:1089–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R. P. (2002) What can we learn from the path equations? Identifiability, constraints, equivalence. Psychometrika 67:225–49.Google Scholar
Rozeboom, W. W. (2009) Some esoteric aspects of SEM that its practitioners should want to know. Multivariate Behavioral Research 44:553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar