Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:29:56.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relation priming, the lexical boost, and alignment in dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Claudine N. Raffray ,
Martin J. Pickering  and
Holly P. Branigan
Claudine N. Raffray
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. claudine.raffray@ed.ac.ukmartin.pickering@ed.ac.ukholly.branigan@ed.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/s0340872/index_htmlhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/index_htmlhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/holly/index_html
Martin J. Pickering
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. claudine.raffray@ed.ac.ukmartin.pickering@ed.ac.ukholly.branigan@ed.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/s0340872/index_htmlhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/index_htmlhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/holly/index_html
Holly P. Branigan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. claudine.raffray@ed.ac.ukmartin.pickering@ed.ac.ukholly.branigan@ed.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/s0340872/index_htmlhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/index_htmlhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/holly/index_html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors' claim that analogical reasoning is the product of relational priming is compatible with language processing work that emphasizes the role of low-level automatic processes in the alignment of situation models in dialogue. However, their model ignores recent behavioral evidence demonstrating a “lexical boost” effect on relational priming. We discuss implications of these data.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 394 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J. & Cleland, A. A. (2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75:B13–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleland, A. A. & Pickering, M. J. (2003) The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language 49:214–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. C. & Anderson, A. (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27:181–218.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. & Brown, A. L. (1989) Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition 35:69–95.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Branigan, H. P. (1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic persistence in written language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39:633–51.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Towards a mechanistic theory of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffray, C. N., Pickering, M. J. & Branigan, H. P. (2007) Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language 57:380–95.Google Scholar
Schober, M. F. (1993) Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition 47:1–24.Google Scholar