Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T03:18:57.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Maria Agthe  and
Jon K. Maner
Maria Agthe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 80802 Munich, GermanyMariaAgthe@lmu.dehttp://www.psy.lmu.de/soz/personen/mitarbeiter/agthe/index.html
Jon K. Maner
Affiliation:
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208jon.maner@kellogg.northwestern.eduhttp://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/directory/maner_jon.aspx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research corroborates the notion that fundamental social motives play an important role in biases that favor attractive people. Although an adaptationist framework expects favorable social effects of good looks in most situations and contexts, it simultaneously allows for potential negative social reactions and outcomes that may be elicited by physical attractiveness in other contexts. These effects of attractiveness reflect the reproductive opportunities and threats posed by potential mates and rivals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e20
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agthe, M., Spörrle, M. & Försterling, F. (2008) Success attributions and more: Multidimensional extensions of the sexual attribution bias to failure attributions, social emotions, and the desire for social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(12):1627–38.Google Scholar
Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., Frey, D. & Maner, J. K. (2014) Looking up versus looking down: Attractiveness-based organizational biases are moderated by social comparison direction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 44:40–45.Google Scholar
Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., Frey, D., Walper, S. & Maner, J. K. (2013) When romance and rivalry awaken: Attractiveness-based social judgment biases emerge at adolescence. Human Nature 24(2):182–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agthe, M., Spöerrle, M. & Maner, J. K. (2010) Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(6):1151–54.Google Scholar
Agthe, M., Spöerrle, M. & Maner, J. K. (2011) Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attractiveness on social decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(8):1042–54.Google Scholar
Agthe, M., Strobel, M., Spörrle, M., Pfundmair, M. & Maner, J. K. (2016) On the borders of harmful and helpful beauty biases: The biasing effects of physical attractiveness depend on sex and ethnicity. Evolutionary Psychology 14(2):1–14.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. L., Adams, G. & Plaut, V. C. (2008) The cultural grounding of personal relationship: The importance of attractiveness in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(2):352–68.Google Scholar
Bazzini, D. G. & Shaffer, D. R. (1999) Resisting temptation revisited: Devaluation versus enhancement of an attractive suitor by exclusive and nonexclusive daters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(2):162–76.Google Scholar
Bleske-Rechek, A. & Lighthall, M. (2010) Attractiveness and rivalry in women's friendships with women. Human Nature 21(1):82–97.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. (1993) Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100(2):204–32.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J., Buunk, B. P. & Dijkstra, P. (2000) Distress about mating rivals. Personal Relationships 7:235–43.Google Scholar
Cloutier, J., Heatherton, T., Whalen, P. & Kelley, W. (2008) Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(6):941–51.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, P. & Buunk, B. P. (2002) Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking effect of rival characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology 32:829–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, M. L. (2004) Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271:283–85.Google Scholar
Försterling, F., Preikschas, S. & Agthe, M. (2007) Ability, luck, and looks: An evolutionary look at achievement ascriptions and the sexual attribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(5):775–88.Google Scholar
Gutierres, S., Kenrick, D. T. & Partch, J. J. (1999) Beauty, dominance, and the mating game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25:1126–34.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. (1992) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218:384–87.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Recheck, A. E. & Frederick, D. A. (2007) Ovulation and human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior 51:40–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishai, A. (2007) Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology 63(2):181–85.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Griskevicius, V., Becker, D. V. & Schaller, M. (2010) Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior the fundamental-motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1):63–67.Google Scholar
Kranz, F. & Ishai, A. (2006) Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology 16:63–68.Google Scholar
Leenaars, L. S., Dane, A. V. & Marini, Z. A. (2008) Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: The role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior 34(4):404–15.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S. & Greenberg, A. (2010) What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(3):339–53.Google Scholar
Luxen, M. F. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2006) Facial attractiveness, sexual selection, and personnel selection: When evolved preferences matter. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(2):241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydon, J. E., Fitzsimons, G. M. & Naidoo, L. (2003) Devaluation versus enhancement of attractive alternatives: A critical test using the calibration paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(3):349–59.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T. & DeWall, C. N. (2007a) Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(1):28–36.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T. & Miller, S. L. (2009a) The implicit cognition of relationship maintenance: Inattention to attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(1):174–79.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A. & Miller, S. L. (2007b) Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(3):389–401.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Moss, J. H., Leo, J. L. & Plant, E. A. (2012) Motivated social categorization: Fundamental motives enhance people's sensitivity to basic social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(1):70–83.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A. & Gailliot, M. T. (2009b) Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97:74–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A. & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008) Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior 29(5):343–49.Google Scholar
Massar, K. & Buunk, A. P. (2010) Judging a book by its cover: Jealousy after subliminal priming with attractive and unattractive faces. Personality and Individual Differences 49:634–38.Google Scholar
Mo, C., Xia, T., Qin, K. & Mo, L. (2016) Natural tendency towards beauty in humans: Evidence from binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0150147.Google Scholar
Neel, R., Kenrick, D. T., White, A. E. & Neuberg, S. L. (2016) Individual differences in fundamental social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110(6):887–907.Google Scholar
Park, L. & Maner, J. K. (2009) Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96:203–17.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. & Buss, D. M. (1996) Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:1185–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W. & Lerma, M. (1990) Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(6):1192–201.Google Scholar
Sui, J. & Liu, C. H. (2009) Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16(2):276–81.Google Scholar
Talamas, S. N., Mavor, K. I. & Perrett, D. I. (2016) Blinded by beauty: Attractiveness bias and accurate perceptions of academic performance. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0148284.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. (2013) Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 368(1631):20130080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaillancourt, T. & Sharma, A. (2011) Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior 37(6):569–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, D. W. & Shepard, G. H. Jr. (1998) Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature 396:321–22.Google Scholar