Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T12:40:34.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triadic conflict “primitives” can be reduced to welfare trade-off ratios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Wenhao Qi Open the ORCID record for Wenhao Qi [Opens in a new window] ,
Edward Vul Open the ORCID record for Edward Vul [Opens in a new window] ,
Adena Schachner Open the ORCID record for Adena Schachner [Opens in a new window]  and
Lindsey J. Powell Open the ORCID record for Lindsey J. Powell [Opens in a new window]
Wenhao Qi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. wqi@ucsd.edu; evul@ucsd.edu; adschachner@ucsd.edu; ljpowell@ucsd.eduhttps://jameswhqi.github.io/; https://www.evullab.org/; https://madlab.ucsd.edu/; https://socallab.ucsd.edu/
Edward Vul
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. wqi@ucsd.edu; evul@ucsd.edu; adschachner@ucsd.edu; ljpowell@ucsd.eduhttps://jameswhqi.github.io/; https://www.evullab.org/; https://madlab.ucsd.edu/; https://socallab.ucsd.edu/
Adena Schachner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. wqi@ucsd.edu; evul@ucsd.edu; adschachner@ucsd.edu; ljpowell@ucsd.eduhttps://jameswhqi.github.io/; https://www.evullab.org/; https://madlab.ucsd.edu/; https://socallab.ucsd.edu/
Lindsey J. Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. wqi@ucsd.edu; evul@ucsd.edu; adschachner@ucsd.edu; ljpowell@ucsd.eduhttps://jameswhqi.github.io/; https://www.evullab.org/; https://madlab.ucsd.edu/; https://socallab.ucsd.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pietraszewski proposes four triadic “primitives” for representing social groups. We argue that, despite surface differences, these triads can all be reduced to similar underlying welfare trade-off ratios, which are a better candidate for social group primitives. Welfare trade-off ratios also have limitations, however, and we suggest there are multiple computational strategies by which people recognize and reason about social groups.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e117
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2016). How the mind makes welfare tradeoffs: Evolution, computation, and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of human kinds. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387–15392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, T., Pouncy, H. T., Gershman, S. J., & Cikara, M. (2018). Discovering social groups via latent structure learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1881–1891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehr, S. A., Krasnow, M. M., Bryant, G. A., & Hagen, E. H. (2021). Origins of music in credible signaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44, e60: 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, A., & Dunham, Y. (2020). Groups as institutions: The use of constitutive rules to attribute group membership. Cognition, 196, 104143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, L. J. (2021). Adopted utility calculus: Origins of a concept of social affiliation. PsyArxiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kuwgf.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (2013). How two intuitive theories shape the development of social categorization. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, P. E., Loui, P., Tarr, B., Schachner, A., Glowacki, L., Mithen, S., & Fitch, W. T. (2021). Music as a coevolved system for social bonding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44, e59: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Handbook of emotions (3rd ed, pp. 114–137). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar