Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:36:24.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why frequencies are natural

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2007

Brian Butterworth
Brian Butterworth
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom. b.butterworth@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research in mathematical cognition has shown that rates, and other interpretations of x/y, are hard to learn and understand. On the other hand, there is extensive evidence that the brain is endowed with a specialized mechanism for representing and manipulating the numerosities of sets – that is, frequencies. Hence, base-rates are neglected precisely because they are rates, whereas frequencies are indeed natural.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 259 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antell, S. E. & Keating, D. P. (1983) Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development 54:695–701.Google Scholar
Bonato, M., Fabbri, S., Umiltà, C. & Zorzi, M. (in press) The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.Google Scholar
Brannon, E. M. & Terrace, H. S. (1998) Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science 282:746–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brannon, E. M. & Terrace, H. S. (2000) Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 26(1):31–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Bright, G. W., Behr, M. J., Post, T. R. & Wachsmuth, I. (1988) Identifying fractions on number lines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19(3):215–32.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (1999) The mathematical brain. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (2001) What seems natural? Science 292:853–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J. & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006) Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-year-old children. Public Library of Science Biology 4(5):844–54.Google Scholar
Castelli, F., Glaser, D. E. & Butterworth, B. (2006) Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: A functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 103(12):4693–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1996) Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 58:1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R. & Tsivkin, S. (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science 284(5416):970–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabbri, S., Tang, J., Butterworth, B. & Zorzi, M. (submitted) The mental representation of fractions: Interaction between numerosity and proportion processing with non-symbolic stimuli.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983) Modularity of mind. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Hoffrage, U. (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102:684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartnett, P. & Gelman, R. (1998) Early understandings of numbers: Paths or barriers to the construction of new understandings? Learning and Instruction 8(4):341–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., MacNeilage, P. & Ware, M. (1996) Numerical representations in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 93:1514–17.Google Scholar
Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E. & Cohen, L. (2003) Approximate quantities and exact number words: dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia 41(14):1942–58.Google Scholar
Mack, N. (1995) Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research Mathematics Education 26:422–41.Google Scholar
Matsuzawa, T. (1985) Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature 315:57–59.Google Scholar
Ni, Y. & Zhou, Y. (2005) Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 40:27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieder, A. (2005) Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(3):1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D. & Dehaene, S. (2004) Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron 44:547–55.Google Scholar
Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B. & Price, C. (2002) Are subitizing and counting: implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? NeuroImage 15(2):435–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Price, C. J. & Butterworth, B. (2006) Exact and approximate judgements of visual and auditory numerosity: An fMRI study. Brain Research 1106:177–88.Google Scholar
Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2007) A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron 53(2):293–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. L., Solomon, G. E. A. & Carey, S. (2005) Never getting to zero: Elementary school students' understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter. Cognitive Psychology 51:101–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafylidou, S. & Vosniadou, S. (2004) The development of student's understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction 14:508–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starkey, P. & Cooper, R. G. Jr. (1980) Perception of numbers by human infants. Science 210:1033–35.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31.Google Scholar
Wynn, K., Bloom, P. & Chiang, W. C. (2002) Enumeration of collective entities by 5-month-old infants. Cognition 83(3):B55–B62.Google Scholar