Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T07:12:08.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Interventions Using the Alternating Treatments Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Janine E. Watson ,
Nirbhay Singh  and
Alan S.W. Winton
Janine E. Watson*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Nirbhay Singh
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Alan S.W. Winton
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
*
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

The alternating treatments design which is increasingly being used in single subject research is described. This design allows the differential effectiveness of two or more treatments to be investigated by presenting each of them separately in closely spaced sessions, with the order of presentation alternated. Consideration is given to the types of behavior and contexts that are most appropriate for use with this design and also to factors important for ensuring its effectiveness and the valid interpretation of the resulting data.

Type
Articles
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 13 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Agras, W.S., Leitenberg, H., Barlow, D.H., and Thomson, L.E. (1969). Instructions and reinforcement in the modification of neurotic behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 1435–1439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., and Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, D.H., and Hayes, S.C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, D.H., Hayes, S.C., and Nelson, R.O. (1984). The Scientist Practitioner. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, D.H., & Hersen, M. (1973). Single-case experimental designs. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, R.P., Matson, J.L., Shapiro, E.S., and Ollendick, T.H. (1981). A comparison of punishment and DRO procedures for treating stereotypic behavior of mentally retarded children. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Edgington, E.S. (1967). Statistical inference from N = 1 experiments. Journal of Psychology, 65, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersen, M., and Barlow, D.H. (1976). Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R.R., Winrott, M., and Vaught, R.S. (1978). Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.S., and Bailey, J.S. (1977). The modification of leisure behavior in a half-way house for retarded women. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J.M., and Pennypacker, H.S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E., and Geesey, S. (1977). Simultaneous treatment design comparisons of the effects of earning reinforcers for one's peers versus for oneself. Behavior Therapy, 8, 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E., and Geesey, S. (1980). Enhancing classroom attentiveness by preselection of back-up reinforcers in a token economy. Behavior Modification, 4, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E., and Hartmann, D.D. (1978). The simultaneous treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9, 912–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E., and Mascitelli, S. (1980). The opportunity to earn oneself off a token system as a reinforcer for attentive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 11, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, P.C. (1984). Behavioral assessment and methodology. In Wilson, G.T., Franks, C.M., Brownell, K.D., & Kendall, P.C., Annual review of behavior therapy: Theory and practice, Volume 9 New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwill, T.R. and Brody, G.H. (1978). Single subject designs: A perspective on the controversy over employing statistical inference and implications for research and training in behavior modification. Behavior Modification, 2, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitenberg, H. (1973). The use of single-case methodology in psychotherapy research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linton, J.M., and Singh, N.N. (in press). Acquisition of sign language using positive practice overcorrection. Behavior Modification.Google Scholar
Ollendick, T.H., Matson, J.L., Esveldt-Dawson, K., and Shapiro, E.S. (1980). Increasing spelling achievement: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternative treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 645–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollendick, T.H., Shapiro, E.S., and Barrett, R.P. (1981). Reducing stereotypic behaviors: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. Behavior Therapy, 12, 570–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, G.S. (1961). An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, E.S., Barrett, R.P., and Ollendick, T.H. (1980). A comparison of physical restraint and positive practice overcorrection in treating stereotypic behavior. Behavior Therapy, 11, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, E.S., Kazdin, A.E., and McGonigle, J.J. (1982). Multiple-treatment interference in the simultaneous- or alternating-treatments design. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 105–115.Google Scholar
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Singh, N.N., Beale, I.L., and Dawson, M.J. (1981). Duration of facial screening and suppression of self-injurious behavior: Analysis using an alternating treatments design. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 411–420.Google Scholar
Singh, N.N., and Singh, J. (1984). Antecedent control of oral reading errors and self-corrections by mentally retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, N.N., Singh, J., and Winton, A.S.W. (1984). Positive practice overcorrection of oral reading errors. Behavior Modification, 8, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N.N., and Winton, A.S.W. (in press). Controlling pica by components of an overcorrection procedure. American Journal of Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Singh, N.N., Winton, A.S., and Dawson, M.J. (1982). Suppression of antisocial behavior by facial screening using multiple baseline and alternating treatments designs. Behavior Therapy, 13, 511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tawney, J.W., and Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Ulman, J.D., and Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1975). Multi-element baseline design in educational research. In Ramp, E. and Semb, G., Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar