Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:55:13.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Heterogeneity of Children's Social Difficulties and the Need for Multiple Assessment Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Alan Ralph
Alan Ralph*
Affiliation:
James Cook University of North Queensland
*
Department of Psychology and Sociology, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia. E-mail: Alan.Ralph@jcu.edu.au
Get access

Extract

A structured diary was used to collect information about the informal peer interactions of 536 children in their final year at nine primary schools. Measures of self-concept, social avoidance, and popularity were also taken. Initially, seven different scores were derived from the information contained in the diary to produce the Adolescent Social Interaction Profile (ASIP). Previous research with the ASIP subsequently identified three factors labelled scale, scope, and enjoyment of peer interactions, that were separate from a fourth generic self-concept factor derived from self-report questionnaires. Inspection of the factor scores for 19 children with full data sets who received the fewest peer nominations showed considerable heterogeneity, with only 1 child scoring low on more than two of the four factors. More expedient composite scores were then derived that reflected the factor loadings for the two complex ASIP scores labelled scale and scope. The utility of these scores for identifying and monitoring specific aspects of peer interaction difficulties is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 166 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bryant, B., & Trower, P.E. (1974). Social difficulty in a student sample. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 13–21.Google Scholar
Campbell, M.A., & Rapee, R.M. (1996). Current issues in the assessment of anxiety in children and adolescents: A developmental perspective. Behaviour Change, 13, 185–193.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D.M., & Patterson, G.R. (1989). Psychometric properties of fourteen latent constructs from the Oregon Youth Study. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cheshire, K. (1996). Family interactions and their relationship with adolescent self-concept and peer interactions. Unpublished manuscript, James Cook University, Townsville.Google Scholar
Dishion, T.J., Patterson, G.R., Reid, J.B., Capaldi, D., & Forgatch, S. (1984). The Peer Nomination Instrument. Unpublished document, OSLC, Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
Elliott, S.N., Sheridan, S.M., & Gresham, F.M. (1989). Assessing and treating social skills deficits: A case for the scientist-practitioner. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 197–222.Google Scholar
Foster, S.L., & Ritchey, W.L. (1979). Issues in the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 625–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karnes, F.A., & Wherry, J.N. (1982). Self-concepts of gifted students as measured by the Piers-Harris Children's Self-concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 49, 903–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketcham, B., & Snyder, R.T. (1977). Self-attitudes of the intellectually and socially advantaged student: Normative study of the Piers-Harris Children's Self-concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 40, 111–116.Google Scholar
Maag, J.W. (1989). Assessment in social skills training: Methodological and conceptual issues for research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piers, E.V. (1969). Manual for the Piers-Harris Children's Self-concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings & Tests.Google Scholar
Ralph, A. (1996). The importance of setting and measuring individual treatment goals for adolescents learning improved pro-social behaviour. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 6, Special Edition, 77–88.Google Scholar
Ralph, A., Merralls, L.J., Hart, L., Porter, J.S., & Tan Su-Neo, A. (1995). Peer interaction networks, self-concept, locus of control, and avoidance of social situations of early adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, A., Williams, C., & Campisi, A. (1997). Measuring peer interactions using the Adolescent Social Interaction Profile. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 71–86.Google Scholar
Ward, R. (1993). Changes in peer relationships during early adolescence as assessed over three school terms. Unpublished manuscript, Murdoch University.Google Scholar