Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:45:47.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cue-Controlled Relaxation and “Aromatherapy” in the Treatment of Speech Anxiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Ilana P. Spector
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
Michael P. Carey
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
Randall S. Jorgensen
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
Andrew W. Meisler
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA
C. L. M. Carnrike Jr.
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the separate and combined effects of cue-controlled relaxation training and “aromatherapy” as treatments for reducing speech anxiety. Thirty-six speech anxious subjects were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: cue-controlled relaxation with a word cue, cue-controlled relaxation with an aroma cue, “aromatherapy” alone, and a wait list (i.e., control) group. Prior to treatment, subjects completed the Personal Report of Confidence as a Speaker, Fear of Negative Evaluation questionnaire, S-R Inventory of Anxiousness-Speech Form, Cognitive Somatic Anxiety Questionnaire, and Multiple Affect Adjective Check List; subjects also performed a speech which was rated for behavioral signs of anxiety. The assessment protocol was repeated following treatment, and at a two-month follow-up. Thirty-two of 36 subjects (89%) provided complete data at post-treatment, and 23 of 28 treated subjects (82%) provided complete data at follow-up. Results indicated that subjects in both cue-controlled relaxation conditions decreased their speech anxiety more than did the subjects in the aromatherapy or control conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, D.A. and Borkovec, T.D. (1973). Progressive Relaxation Training: A Manual for the Helping Professions. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
Carey, M.P. and Burish, T.G. (1988). Etiology and treatment of the psychological side effects associated with cancer chemotherapy: A critical review and discussion. Psychological Bulletin 104, 307325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeGood, D.E. and Tait, R.C. (1987). The Cognitive-Somatic Anxiety Questionnaire: psychometric and validity data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 9, 7587.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.M., Helsel, W.J., Rojahn, J. and Cipollone, R. (1989). Aversive conditioning of visual screening with aromatic ammonia for treating aggressive and disruptive behavior in a developmentally disabled child. Behavior Modification 13, 91107.Google Scholar
Earls, C.M. and Castonguay, L.G. (1989). The evaluation of olfactory aversion for a bisexual pedophile with a single-case multiple baseline design. Behavior Therapy 20, 137146.Google Scholar
Endler, N.S., Hunt, J.M. and Rosenstein, A.J. (1962). An S-R Inventory of Anxiousness. Psychological Monographs 76 (17, Whole No. 536).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlichman, H. and Halpern, J.N. (1988). Affect and memory: effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55, 769779.Google Scholar
Filsinger, E.E. and Monte, W.C. (1986). Sex history, menstrual cycle, and psychophysical ratings of alpha androstenone, a possible human pheromone. Journal of Sex Research 22, 243248.Google Scholar
Fremouw, W.J. and Zitter, R.E. (1978). A comparison of skills training and cognitive restructuring-relaxation for the treatment of speech anxiety. Behavior Therapy 9, 248259.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B. (1985, 08 23). Fragrances offer latest clues in ways to combat stress, fatigue. Los Angeles Times, pp. 1, 14.Google Scholar
Grimm, L.G. (1980). The evidence for cue-controlled relaxation. Behavior Therapy 11, 283293.Google Scholar
Heimberg, R.G., Dodge, C.S., Hope, D.A., Kennedy, C.R. and Zollo, L.J. (1990). Cognitive behavioral group treatment for social phobia: comparison with a credible placebo control. Cognitive Therapy and Research 14, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1980). Research Design in Clinical Psychology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Krentz, C. (1988, 05). Escentials. Montreal Magazine, pp. 2628.Google Scholar
Lent, R.W., Russell, R.K. and Zamostny, K.P. (1981). Comparison of cue-controlled desensitization, rational restructuring, and a credible placebo in the treatment of speech anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 49, 608610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorig, T.S. and Schwartz, G.E. (1987a). Alteration of EEG by odor administration. Psychophysiology 24, 598599.Google Scholar
Lorig, T.S. and Schwartz, G.E. (1987b). EEG activity during relaxation and food imagery. Psychophysiology 24, 599.Google Scholar
Mullen, B. (1988). Advanced BASIC Meta-analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paul, G. (1966). Insight versus Desensitization in Psychotherapy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, R.K. and Wise, F. (1976). Treatment of speech anxiety by cue-controlled relaxation and desensitization with professional and paraprofessional counselors. Journal of Counseling Psychology 23, 583586.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.E., Davidson, R.J. and Goleman, D.J. (1978). Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in the self-regulation of anxiety: effects of meditation versus exercise. Psychosomatic Medicine 40, 321328.Google Scholar
Seligman, M.E.P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review 77, 406418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, J.E. (1974). Innate discriminative human facial expressions to taste and smell stimulation. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 237, 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsujimoto, R.N., Hamilton, M. and Berger, D.E. (1990). Averaging multiple judges to improve validity: aid to planning cost-effective clinical research. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2, 432437.Google Scholar
Watson, D. and Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33, 448457.Google Scholar
Warren, C.B., Munteanu, M.A., Schwartz, G.E., Benaim, C., Walter, H.G. Jr., Leight, R.S., Withycombe, D.A., Mookherjee, B.D. and Trenkle, R.W. (1987). Method of causing the reduction of physiological and/or subjective reactivity to stress in human beings subjected to stress conditions: A United States patent. Patent No. 4671959.Google Scholar
White, D. (1981, 09). Pursuit of the ultimate aphrodisiac. Psychology Today, pp. 912.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B. and Rinck, C.M. (1983). Construction of new scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 5, 119129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.