Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:55:21.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adults: Face to Face versus Telephone Treatment - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2011

Mary Burgess ,
Manoharan Andiappan  and
Trudie Chalder
Mary Burgess*
Affiliation:
South London & Maudsley Trust, London, UK
Manoharan Andiappan
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK
Trudie Chalder
Affiliation:
King's College Hospital, London, UK
*
Reprint requests to Mary Burgess, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research and Treatment Unit, First Floor, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London SE5 8AZ, UK. E-mail: mary.burgess@slam.nhs.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown that face to face cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME). However, some patients are unable to travel to the hospital for a number of reasons. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess whether face to face CBT was more effective than telephone CBT (with face to face assessment and discharge appointment) for patients with CFS. Method: Patients aged 18–65 were recruited from consecutive referrals to the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) Research and Treatment Unit at The South London and Maudsley NHS Trust in London. Participants were randomly allocated to either face to face CBT or telephone CBT by a departmental administrator. Blinding of participants and care givers was inappropriate for this trial. A parallel-groups randomised controlled trial was used to compare the two treatments. The primary outcomes were physical functioning and fatigue. Results: Significant improvements in the primary outcomes of physical functioning and fatigue occurred and were maintained to one year follow-up after discharge from treatment. Improvements in social adjustment and global outcome were noted and patient satisfaction was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Results from this study indicate that telephone CBT with two face to face appointments is a mild to moderately effective treatment for CFS and may be offered to patients where face to face treatment is not a viable option. Despite these encouraging conclusions, dropout was relatively high and therapists should be aware of this potential problem.

Keywords

Cognitive behaviour therapychronic fatigue syndrometelephoneface to face
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 175 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentall, R. P., Powell, P., Nye, F. J. and Edwards, R. H. (2002). Predictors of response to treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 248–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, M. and Chalder, T. (2001). Telephone cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in secondary care: a case series. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 447–458.Google Scholar
Cella, M. and Chalder, T. (2010). Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cella, M., Sharpe, M. and Chalder, T. (2011). Measuring disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cella, M., Stahl, D., Reme, S. E. and Chalder, T. (2011) Therapist effects in routine psychotherapy practice: an account from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 168–178.Google Scholar
Chalder, T., Berelowitz, G., Hirsch, S., Pawilikowska, T., Wallace, P., Wessely, S., et al. (1993). Development of a fatigue scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, D., Bagnall, A. M., Hempel, S. and Forbes, C. (2006). Interventions for the treatment, management and rehabilitation of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an updated systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 506–520.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Deale, A., Chalder, T., Marks, I. and Wessely, S. (1997). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 408–414.Google Scholar
Fukuda, K., Straus, S., Hickie, I., Sharpe, M. C., Dobbins, J. G. and Komaroff, A. (1994). Chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic fatigue syndrome study group. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121, 953–959.Google Scholar
Joyce, J., Hotopf, M. and Wessely, S. (1997). The prognosis of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 90, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, L. and Christensen, H. (2006). A systematic review of telephone-based interventions for mental disorders. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell, K., Cox, D., Haddock, G., Jones, C., Raines, D., Garvey, R., et al. (2006). Telephone administered cognitive behaviour therapy for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. British Medical Journal doi:10.1136/bmj.38940.355602.80.Google Scholar
Mundt, J. C., Marks, I. M., Shear, K. and Griest, J. H. (2002). The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 461–464.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2007). Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy). NICE Clinical Guideline, 53. London: NICE. www.nice.org.uk/CG53Google Scholar
Pocock, S. J. (1995). Clinical Trials: a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Price, J. R., Mitchell, E., Tidy, E. and Hunot, V. (2008). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults: Cochrane review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No: CD001027. DOl: 10. 1002/1465 1858. CD001027. Pub2.Google Scholar
Prins, J., Bleijenberg, G., Bazelmans, E., Elving, L., de Boo, T., Severens, J., et al. (2001). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 357, Issue 9259, 841–847.Google Scholar
Quarmby, L., Rimes, K.A., Deale, A., Wessely, S. and Chalder, T. (2007). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmaling, K. B., Smith, W. R. and Buchwald, D. S. (2000). Significant other responses are associated with fatigue and functional status among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 444–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpe, M. C., Archard, L. C., Banatvala, J. E., Borysiewicz, L. K., Clare, A. W., David, A., et al. (1991). A report-chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 118–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpe, M. and Chalder, T. (1994). In Illis, L. S. , L. S. (Ed.) Management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: neurological rehabilitation (pp. 282–294). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M., Hawton, K., Simkin, S., Surawy, C., Hackmann, A., Klimes, I., et al. (1996). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 312, 22–26Google Scholar
Stewart, A., Hays, R. and Ware, J. (1988). The MOS Short Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 26, 724–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessely, S., David, A., Butler, S. and Chalder, T. (1989). Management of chronic (post-viral) fatigue syndrome. Journal of Royal College of General Practitioners, 39, 26–29.Google ScholarPubMed
White, P. D., Goldsmith, K. A., Johnson, A. L., Potts, L., Walwyn, R., DeCesare, J. C., et al. (2011). Comparison of adaptive pacing, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial. The Lancet, 377, 823–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, P., Bagnall, A. M., Snowdon, A. J., Cornell, J. E. and Mulrow, C. D. (2001). Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome. JAMA, 286, 1360–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zigmond, A. and Snaith, R. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 87, 361–370.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.