Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T06:41:56.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How multiple sources of experience influence bilingual syntactic choice: Immediate and cumulative cross-language effects of structural priming, verb bias, and language dominance*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

GERRIT JAN KOOTSTRA  and
WILLEMIJN J. DOEDENS
GERRIT JAN KOOTSTRA*
Affiliation:
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands Center for Language Science, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
WILLEMIJN J. DOEDENS
Affiliation:
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
*
Address for correspondence: Gerrit Jan Kootstra, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Division of Human Movement and Education, Campus 2–6, P.O. Box 10090, 8000 GB Zwolle, the Netherlandsgj.kootstra@windesheim.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated trial-by-trial and cumulative cross-language effects of structural priming and verb bias on L1 and L2 dative syntactic choices (e.g., ‘boy-give-ball-to-girl’ [PO structure] vs. ‘boy-give-girl-ball’ [DO structure]). Dutch-dominant Dutch–English bilinguals listened to a prime sentence with a DO or PO structure in one language and then described a picture in the other language, using verbs that varied in their bias towards the PO or DO structure in Dutch and English. We found effects of cross-language structural priming and verb bias on syntactic choice, some of which were influenced by the participants’ language dominance. In addition, we found cumulative forms of structural priming, leading to cross-language priming effects between experimental blocks. We discuss these results in terms of models on the representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals, and point out how the observed effects can be related to experience-based mechanisms of language use and contact-induced language change.

Keywords

structural primingverb biaslanguage dominanceadaptationcumulativitylanguage experiencelanguage changebilingualism
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Special Issue 4: Cross-language Effects in Bilingual Production and Comprehension , August 2016 , pp. 710 - 732
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. The research reported in this paper was supported by an ERC-Advanced grant (ERC-2008-AdG, SH5; ‘Traces of Contact: Language contact studies and historical linguistics’), awarded to Pieter Muysken (Radboud University Nijmegen). Parts of the writing of this paper were supported by NSF grant OISE-0968369 to Judith Kroll, Janet van Hell, and Paola Dussias (Pennsylvania State University). Gerrit Jan Kootstra is now at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

References

Alferink, I., & Gullberg, M. (2014). French-Dutch bilinguals do not maintain obligatory semantic distinctions: Evidence from placement verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 22–37.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455–461.Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931–949.Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2012). Effects of phonological feedback on the selection of syntax: Evidence from between-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 503–516.Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: the influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127, 287–306.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–25.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In Bouma, G., Krämer, I., & Zwarts, J. (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, pp. 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. (2011). Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of Path among Japanese learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 79–94.Google Scholar
Bullock, B. E., & Toribio, A. J. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, Z., Pickering, M. J., Yan, H., & Branigan, H. P. (2011). Lexical and syntactic representations between closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 431–445.Google Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192–208.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colleman, T. (2006). De Nederlandse datiefalternantie: Een constructioneel en corpusgebaseerd onderzoek. PhD dissertation, Ghent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283–1296.Google Scholar
Coyle, J. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2008). Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 967–970.Google Scholar
de Bot, K. (2010). Cognitive processing in bilinguals: From static to dynamic models. In Kaplan, R. B. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, 2nd edition, pp. 335–348. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 369, 20120394.Google Scholar
Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 610–632.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A., van Jaarsveld, H., & ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51–66.Google Scholar
Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Two words, one meaning: Evidence of automatic co-activation of translation equivalents. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, article 188.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. (1996). Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 724–755.Google Scholar
Flett, S., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 751–760.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Jiang, N. (2001). The nature of the bilingual lexicon: Experiments with the masked priming paradigm. In Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing, pp. 72–83. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: The behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, article 103.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘‘alternations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97–129.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3,182–200.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 365–399.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing, pp. 1–22. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S. (2015). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, available on CJO2015. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000164.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128, 479–489.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish–English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414.Google Scholar
Hatzidaki, A., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2011). Co-activation of syntax in bilingual language production. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 123–150.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. E., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 220–225.Google Scholar
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 249–261.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. (2007). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. In Wolter, L. & Thorson, J. (eds.), University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, 3, 26–44.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, J. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.Google Scholar
Jäger, G., & Rosenbach, A. (2008). Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics, 3, 85–113.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (1999). Testing processing explanations for the asymmetry in masked cross-language priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 59–75.Google Scholar
Kantola, L., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual representations. Memory & Cognition, 39, 276–290.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35, 925–937.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Coyle, J. (2014). Long and short term cumulative structural priming effects. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 728–743.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39, 381–388.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., & Şahin, H. (under review). Cross-linguistic structural priming as a mechanism of contact-induced language change: Evidence from Papiamento-Dutch bilinguals in Aruba and the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2009). Two speakers, one dialogue. An interactive alignment perspective on code-switching in bilingual speakers. In Isurin, L., Winford, D., & de Bot, K. (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching, pp. 129–159. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2012). Priming of code-switches in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and language proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 797–819.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J. (2015). A psycholinguistic perspective on code-switching: Lexical, structural, and socio-interactive processes. In Stell, G. & Yakpo, K. (Eds.), Code-switching between structural and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 39–64). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119–135.Google Scholar
Loebell, H., & Bock, J. K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41, 791–824.Google Scholar
Luka, B. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 436–459.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, article 226.Google Scholar
Melinger, A., & Dobel, C. (2005). Lexically-driven syntactic priming. Cognition, 98, B11–B20.Google Scholar
Morett, L. M., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 132–151.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 709–730.Google Scholar
Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 94–114.Google Scholar
Nitschke, S., Serratrice, L., & Kidd, E. (2014). The effect of linguistic nativeness on structural priming in comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 525–542.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190; discussion 190–226.Google Scholar
Runnqvist, E., Gollan, T. H., Costa, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2013). A disadvantage in bilingual sentence production modulated by syntactic frequency and similarity across languages. Cognition, 129, 256–263.Google Scholar
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N. (2006). Lexical activation of cross-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 299–307.Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–171.Google Scholar
ten Thije, J. D., & Zeevaert, L. (2007). Receptive Multilingualism: Linguistic Analyses, Language Policies and Didactic Concepts. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2011). Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 241–267.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., & Kim, A. E. (1998). How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 101–132.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 780–789.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & Tanner, D. (2012). Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation. Language Learning, 62, 148–171.Google Scholar