Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:26:20.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and cognition in bilingual production: the real work still lies ahead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

ANTONELLA SORACE
ANTONELLA SORACE*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
Address for correspondence: University of Edinburgh, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, 3 Charles Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Scotland, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Goldrick, Putnam and Schwarz (Goldrick, Putnam & Schwarz) argue that code-mixing in bilingual production involves not only combining forms from both languages but also – crucially – integrating grammatical principles with gradient mental representations. They further propose an analysis of a particular case of intrasentential code mixing – doubling constructions – framed within the formalism of Gradient Symbolic Computation. This formalism, in their view, is better suited to accounting for code mixing than other generative language models because it allows the weighting of constraints both in the choice of particular structures within a single language and in blends of structures in code-mixed productions.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , November 2016 , pp. 895 - 896
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chamorro, G., Sorace, A., & Sturt, P. (2015). What is the source of L1 attrition? The effects of recent re- exposure on Spanish speakers under L1 attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (DOI: 10.1017/S1366728915000152).Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 515–530.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Kroll, J., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: evidence for the role of inhibition in second language learning. Psychological Science 20, 1507–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2006). Gradience and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In Fanselow, G., Féry, C., Schlesewsky, M. and Vogel, R. (eds). Gradience in Language: Generative Perspective, 106–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar