Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:59:56.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of human disturbance on Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus behaviour and breeding success

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Pablo Yorio  and
P. Dee Boersma
Pablo Yorio
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation International, The Bronx Zoo, New York 10460, U.S.A.
P. Dee Boersma
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Studies and Department of Zoology, FM-12, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus along the Patagonian coast, Argentina, are increasingly exposed to human activities, especially to a growing tourist industry. We quantified the effects of human visitation and disturbance on the behaviour and breeding of Magellanic Penguins. Nesting penguins differed in their response to human approach, allowing a significantly closer approach before responding with threat and defensive displays in the tourist area than in areas rarely visited by people. When approached during incubation, no penguins abandoned their nest. Breeding success and fledgling weights were similar in the tourist area and non-tourist areas. Magellanic Penguins appear to be tolerant of human visitation, and penguins breeding in the tourist area become accustomed to people walking among their nests. We suggest visitation may be compatible with penguin reproduction if visits are controlled.

El Pingüino de Magallanes Spheniscus magellanicus de las costas patagónicas de la Argentina, esta expuesto a las crecientes actividades humanas, especialmente el aumento de la demanda turistica. Se han cuantificado los efectos de las visitas y molestias del hombre en el comportamiento y reproducción de la especie. Los pingüinos mostraron diferencias en su respuesta frent a la proximidad humana, permitiendo un acercamiento signifi-cativamente mayor antes de responder con actitudes defensivas en áreas frecuentadas por los turistas en comparicion con aquellas rara vez visitadas. La proximidad humana durante la época de incubación no supuso en ninguna ocasión el abandono de nidos. El éxito reproductive y los pesos de los jóvenes al abandonar el nido resultaron similares en a l zona turística y en la menos frecuentada. El Pingüino de Magallanes parece tolerar la presencia del hombre, y aquellos que nidifican en el área turistica se habitúan a los visitantes que caminan entre sus nidos. Sugerimos que las visitas pueden ser compatibles con la reproducción de la especie siempre y cuando las mismas estén controladas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 161 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1992

References

Ainley, D. G., LeResche, R. E. and Sladen, W. J. L. (1983) Breeding biology of the Adelie Penguin. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. W. and Keith, J. O. (1980) The human influence on seabird nesting success: conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 18: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, N. J. and Amlaner, C. R. Jr (1980) Changing heart rates of Herring Gulls when approached by humans. Pp.589–594 in Amlaner, C. J. and Macdonald, D. W., eds. A handbook on biotelemetry and radio tracking. Oxford: Pergamon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bary Pereda, S. (1990) Influence of nest-site characteristics on the reproductive success of Magellanic Penguins. M.S. thesis. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. D. (1976) An ecological and behavioral study of the Galapagos Penguin. Living Bird 15: 43–93.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. D. (1988) Census of Magellanic Penguins at Punta Tombo, Argentina. Pacific Seabird Group Bull. 15: 22 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Boersma, P. D., Stokes, D. L. and Yorio, P. M. (1990a) Reproductive variability and historical change of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) at Punta Tombo, Argentina. Pp. 15–43 in Davis, L. S. and Darby, J. T., eds. Penguin biology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. D., Stokes, D. L. and Conway, W. (1990b) Punta Tombo management plan. Wildlife Conservation International/New York Zoological Society (unpublished).Google Scholar
Boswall, J. and Maclver, D. (1975) The Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus. Pp 271–305 in Stonehouse, B., ed. The biology of penguins. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, F. G. and Buckley, P. A. (1972) The breeding ecology of Royal Terns Sterna (Thalasseus) maxima maxima. Ibis 114: 344–359.Google Scholar
Burger, J. (1981) Effects of human disturbance on colonial birds, particularly gulls. Colonial Waterbirds 4: 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. (1981) Discrimination of the threat of direct versus tangential approach to the nest by incubating Herring and Great Black-backed Gulls.. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 95: 678–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. (1983) Behavioral responses to human intruders of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gulls (Larus marinus) with varying exposure to human disturbance. Behav. Processes 8: 327–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croxall, J. P., Mclness, S. J. and Prince, P. A. (1984) The status and conservation of seabirds at the Falkland Islands. Pp. 271–291 in Croxall, J. P., Evans, P. G. H. and Schreiber, R. W. eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for Bird Preservation (Techn. Publ. 2).Google Scholar
Croxall, J. P., Pickering, S. P. C. and Rothery, P. (1990) Influence of the increasing fur seal population on wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans breeding on Bird Island, South Georgia. Pp. 237–240 in Kerry, K. R. and Hempel, G., eds. Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culik, B., Adelung, D. and Woakes, A. J. (1990) The effects of disturbance on the heart rate and behaviour of Adelie Penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) during the breeding season. Pp. 177–182 in Kerry, K. R. and Hempel, G., eds. Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change conservation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, J. M. (1960) Some adaptations in the nesting behaviour of terns. Pp. 153–157 in Proc. 12th Internatn. Orn. Congr. Helsinki: Tilgmannin Kirjapaino.Google Scholar
Eggleton, P. and Siegfried, W. R. (1977) Displays of the Jackass Penguin. Ostrich 50: 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, P. G. H., Siegfried, W. R. and Cooper, J. (1976) Conservation of the Jackass Penguin (Spheniscus demersus (L)). Biol. Conserv. 9: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gochfeld, M. (1980) Timing of breeding and chick mortality in central and peripheral nests of Magellanic Penguins. Auk 97: 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, J. L. (1980) Human disturbance in Western Gull Larus occidentalis colonies and possible amplification by intraspecific predation. Biol. Conserv. 18: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, C. (1986) Effects of the 1982-83 El Nino on Humboldt Penguin colonies in Peru. Biol. Conserv. 36: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, M. (1989) Human-induced tachycardia in wild and tame Mallard (Anas platyrhyn-chos). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 92A: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Heezik, Y. and Seddon, P. J. (1990) Effect of human disturbance on beach groups of Jackass Penguins. S. Afr. ]. Wildl. Res. 20: 89–93.Google Scholar
Hockey, P. A. R. and Hallinan, J. (1981) Effect of human disturbance on the breeding behaviour of Jackass Penguins Spheniscus demersus. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 11: 59–62.Google Scholar
Humphrey, P. S., Livezey, B. C. and Siegel-Causey, D. (1987) Tameness of birds of the Falkland Islands: an index and preliminary results. Bird Behavior 7: 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, G. L. (1972) Influence on food distribution and human disturbance on the reproductive success of Herring Gulls. Ecology 53: 1051–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanwisher, J. W., Williams, T. C., Teal, J. M. and Lawson, K. O. (1978) Radiotelemetry of heart rates from free ranging gulls. Auk 95: 288–293.Google Scholar
Kury, C. R. and Gochfeld, M. (1975) Human interference and gull predation in cormorant colonies. Biol. Conserv. 8: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuwal, D. A. (1978) Effects of man on marine birds: a review. Pp. 140–160 in John S. Wright For. Conf. Proc. Wildl. and People. Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Muller-Schwarze, D. (1985) Possible human impact on penguin populations in the Antarctic Peninsula area. Antarct. J. U.S. 19: 158–159.Google Scholar
Ollason, J. C. and Dunnet, G. M. (1980) Nest failures in the fulmar: the effect of observers.. Field Orn. 51: 39–54.Google Scholar
Robert, H. C. and Ralph, C. J. (1975) Effects of human disturbance on the breeding success of gulls. Condor 77: 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. L. and Roberts, S. L. (1973) Survival rate of Yellow-eyed Penguin eggs and chicks on the Otago peninsula. Notornis 20: 1–5.Google Scholar
Schreiber, R. W. (1979) Reproductive performance of the Eastern Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis. Contrib. Sci. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scolaro, J. A. (1984) Timing of nest relief during incubation and guard stage period of chicks in Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) (Aves: Spheniscidae). Historia Natural 4: 281–284.Google Scholar
Spurr, E. B. (1975) Communication in the Adelie Penguin. Pp.449–501 in Stonehouse, B., ed. The biology of penguins. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, J. F. and Schwab, E. R. (1980) Telemetry of heart rate as a measure of the effectiveness of dispersal inducing stimuli in seagulls. Pp. 603–610 in Amlaner, C. J. and MacDonald, D. W., eds. A handbook on biotelemetry and radio tracking. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. B. (1977) Effects of human disturbance on an Adelie Penguin rookery and measures of control. Pp. 1117–1180 in Llano, G. A., ed. Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Veen, J. (1977) Functional and causal aspects of nest distribution in colonies of the Sandwich Tern. Behaviour (Suppl) XX: 1–193.Google Scholar
Wilson, K.-J., Taylor, R. H. and Barton, K. J. (1990) The impact of man on Adelie Penguins at Cape Hallet, Antarctica. Pp. 183–190 in Kerry, K. R. and Hempel, G., eds. Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, E. C. (1990) Long-term stability and human impact in Antarctic Skuas and Adelie Penguins. Pp. 231–236 in Kerry, K. R. and Hempel, G., eds. Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar