Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:52:22.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Migration and other movements among the lower Paraná River valley wetlands, Argentina, and the south Brazil/Pantanal wetlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Paulo de Tarso Zuquim Antas
Affiliation:
CEMAVE/IBAMA, Caixa Postal 04/034, 70312-970 Brasília D.F., Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The southern portion of South America plays an important role for the conservation of many waterfowl and waders. Migratory movements were, till recently, known only for Arctic or Patagonian species. The only exception was the Southern Pochard Netta peposaca, with a west—east winter migration from the lower Parana River valley to south Brazil coastal wetlands. The banding studies that have been conducted by the Centro de Pesquisas para a Conservação das Aves Silvestres (CEMAVE/IBAMA) since 1980, directly or through agreements with local organizations, showed more details of this migration, plus indications that other aquatic species such as Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis, other duck species, Neotropic Cormorant Phalacrocorax olivaceus and White-faced Plegadis chihi may follow the same pattern. A migration into the same area the Pantanal population of the Wood Stork Mycteria americana was only recently discovered, and other species may also do likewise when the Pantanal is seasonally flooded. The studies of such bird migration or movements between the main South American wetlands are of great importance to understanding their conservation needs, especially when international cooperation among the countries plays a most important role. The region has been suffering human pressures of various types, from land reclamation for pasture and/or agriculture to the operation, in the last 30 years, of big hydroelectric dams which affect the natural flow of rivers or keep flood-plains under water. The impending construction of the Hidrovia Paranà/Paraguay, a large project for heavy river use as a main transportation route, may represent an enormous impact on such rich aquatic habitats, demanding immediate cooperation among the countries involved to mitigate negative effects on the environment. The impact may be similar to what happened in the Mississippi valley early this century. The west-east movements between the Paranà River valley and south Brazil are of special conservation interest, as a nationally threatened species (in Brazil) is involved (the Chilean Flamingo) as well as duck species targeted for the hunting season in the area.

Type
Growing Points in Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1994

References

Antas, P. T. Z., Nascimento, J. L. X., Silva, F. and Scherer, S. B. (1990) Migração de Netta peposaca entre o sul do Brasil e a Argentina. P. 24 in Resumos VI Encontro National de Anilhadores de Aves. Rio Grande do Sul: Universidade Católica de Pelotas.Google Scholar
Antas, P. T. Z. and Nascimento, J. L. X. (1991) Movimentação e situação atual de Anas georgica no sul do Brasil. Resumenes del IV Congreso de Ornitologia Neotropical, 39 de Noviembre, 1991, Quito, Ecuador (summary 149).Google Scholar
Belton, W. (1984) Birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 1: Rheidae through Furnariidae. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 178: 369636.Google Scholar
Cintra, R. and Yamashita, C. (1990) Habitats, abundância e ocorrência das espécies de aves do Pantanal de Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Pap. Avuls. Dep. Zool. Sao Paulo 37: 121.Google Scholar
Narosky, T. and Yzurieta, D. (1987) Guia para la identificatión de las aves de Argentina y Uruguay. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Asociación Ornitologica del Plata.Google Scholar
Nascimento, J. L. X., Antas, P. T. Z., Silva, F. and Scherer, S. B. (1990) Movimentação de Dendrocygna bicolor entre o Rio Grande do Sul e Argentina. Pp. 2526 in Resumos, VI Encontro National de Anilhadores de Aves. Rio Grande do Sul: Universidade Católica de Pelotas.Google Scholar
Nores, M. and Yzurieta, D. (1980) Aves de ambientes acudticos de Córdoba y centro da Argentina. C6rdoba, Argentina: Secretaria de Agricultura y Ganaderia.Google Scholar
Olrog, C. C. (1962) El anillado de aves en Argentina, 1961–1962. Segundo Informe. Neotropica (Supl.) 8: I–VIII.Google Scholar
Olrog, C. C. (1968) El anillado de aves en Argentina, 1964–1966. Quinto Informe. Neo-tropica 14: 1722.Google Scholar
Olrog, C. C. (1971) El anillado de aves en Argentina, 1961–1971. Séptimo Informe. Neo-tropica 17: 97100.Google Scholar
Olrog, C. C. (1973) El anillado de aves en Argentina, 1961–1974. Octavo Informe. Neo-tropica 19: 6972.Google Scholar
Olrog, C. C. (1975) El anillado de aves en Argentina, 1961–1974. Noveno Informe. Neo-tropica 21: 1719.Google Scholar
Scott, D. and Carbonell, M. (1986) A directory of Neotropical wetlands. Cambridge, U.K., and Slimbridge, U.K.: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, and International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau.Google Scholar
Silva, F. (1987) Movimenros de dispersão da Marreca-Parda (Anas georgica): recuperaçōes e recapturas. Pp. 211212 in Anais do II Encontro Nacional de Anilhadores de Aves. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Yamashita, C. and Valle, M. P. (1987) Sobre o anilhamento e migração de Mycteria americana no Pantanal. Pp. 196197 in Anais do II Encontro Nacional de Anilhadores de Aves. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar