In light of recent high profile racially motivated incidents, both globally and specifically in the UK, the impact of racism on health and well-being has become the subject of media attention as well as research, policy and practice. For example, in the UK, a surge of instances of racist abuse posted on social media ensued following the 2016 referendum about the UK's membership of the EU (‘Brexit’)Reference Burnett1 and the 2019 death by drowning of 12-year-old Shukri Yahye-Abdi – a young, Black Muslim schoolgirl – sparked protest as many suspected racial motivation behind the bullying in the lead up to her death. The 2020 murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, by a White police officer in the USA sparked global protest.
In this paper, we refer to various types of racism, such as internalised, interpersonal, institutional and structural racism. Definitions are provided in Table 1, taken from USA-based racial justice organisation Race Forward (https://www.raceforward.org/). We also refer to vicarious racism using a recommended definition.Reference Heard-Garris, Cale, Camaj, Hamati and Dominguez2
All quotes are definitions taken from Race Forward.
Notwithstanding the usefulness of these definitions, the literature suggests the use of the terms ‘racism’ and ‘racial discrimination’ is interchangeable.Reference Berger and Sarnyai3 Both are used in reference to unequal and harmful distribution of power in societies on the basis of cultural, ancestral or phenomenological difference among individuals.Reference Berger and Sarnyai3 Indeed, when considering racism definitions have related interchangeably to discrimination relating to individuals’ ‘race’, ‘ethnicity’ and ‘ancestry’.Reference Ali-Khan, Krakowski, Tahir and Daar4 Whereas race is a sociopolitical construct that groups people based on perceived physical traits, ethnicity captures elements of an individual's identity beyond physical characteristics, such as culture, language and religion.Reference Lu, Ahmed, Lamri and Anand5 Ancestry can be further broken down into geographical, genealogical and genetic characterisations.Reference Lu, Ahmed, Lamri and Anand5
Although racism is increasingly recognised as a key contributor to poor mental health,Reference Paradies, Ben, Denson, Elias, Priest and Pieterse6 the existing literature primarily focuses on the effects of racism on adults and/or is based in the USA (e.g. Heard-Garris et alReference Heard-Garris, Cale, Camaj, Hamati and Dominguez2 and Paradies et alReference Paradies, Ben, Denson, Elias, Priest and Pieterse6). A number of meta-analyses found a strong association between poor mental health outcomes and racial discrimination in both adults,Reference Williams, Neighbors and Jackson7,Reference Paradies9 and among children and adolescents.Reference Lazaridou, Heinz, Schulze and Bhugra10 For example, a significant association between racism and suicidality was found in a systematic review of studies of young people in the USA.Reference Rudes and Fantuzzi11 Studies on Indigenous AustraliansReference Larson, Gillies, Howard and Coffin12 and ethnic minority groups based in the UKReference Chakraborty, McKenzie, Hajat and Stansfeld13 are fewer but have also indicated associations between experiences of racism and poor mental health. For example, Chakraborty et alReference Chakraborty, McKenzie, Hajat and Stansfeld13 found that there was an association between experiences of racial insults and higher scores on a psychosis screening questionnaire among participants aged 16–74 years who were Caribbean, Bangladeshi and Pakistani in England. The experiences that young people have of racism varies. They may experience interpersonal racism, or they may notice the impact on their parents, families and communities through vicarious racism. They may not necessarily connect their experience of exclusion, marginalisation or bullying to race, culture or ethnicity; conversely, they may be too aware, potentially resulting in internalised racism.Reference Jacob, Faber, Faber, Bartlett, Ouimet and Williams14 What is clear is that direct and vicarious experiences of racism can result in race-based traumatic stress; that is, the psychological and physiological impact of exposure to racial discrimination, which can be debilitating if prolonged.Reference Anderson and Stevenson15 Racial trauma may explain the disproportionate prevalence of exposure to trauma among children and young people of colour compared with White children and young people.Reference Saleem, Anderson and Williams16 Moreover, it is suggested that in comparison to general bullying, race-based bullying, a source of racial trauma, has been associated with more negative mental healthReference Xu, Macrynikola, Waseem and Miranda17 and general health consequences.Reference Xu, Macrynikola, Waseem and Miranda17
National surveys are important for providing data on the mental health of minoritised ethnic groups, which may give some indication of the effects of experiences of racism. Data with adult populations in England suggest that common mental health disorders, post-traumatic stress and psychoses are more prevalent in adults from minoritised groups than in ‘White’ adults, with particularly high rates among ‘Black’ adults.Reference McManus, Bebbington, Jenkins and Brugha18 (We note that both ‘White’ and ‘Black’ have been put in quotations to express the imprecisions of racial categories.) It is well established that many of these disorders commonly first have their onset in childhood or adolescence (e.g. Solmi et alReference Solmi, Radua, Olivola, Croce, Soardo and Salazar de Pablo19). However, in contrast, recent NHS data suggest ‘White’ children and young people are more likely to have a mental health condition than ‘Black, Asian Minority Ethnic’ children and young people.Reference Newlove-Delgado, Marcheselli, Williams, Mandalia, McManus and Savic20 Although, notably, there is a marked lack of quality and completeness of data for many ethnic groups coupled often with small sample sizes within groups, often resulting in aggregation of ethnic groups sometimes into one all-encompassing group, and so the estimates should be considered with caution.Reference Newlove-Delgado, Marcheselli, Williams, Mandalia, McManus and Savic20 Together these findings raise the possibility that the mental health needs of minoritised groups of children and young people are overlooked and the particular contribution of experiences of racism remains unclear, particularly given wider potential issues with access to services, recognition of poor mental health among ethnic minorities as well as the recording of these conditions.
Research with adults highlights the contribution of experiences of racism to poor mental health. A review of literature from various countries found experiences of interpersonal racism, specifically discrimination, were associated with poor mental health among adults.Reference Williams, Lawrence, Davis and Vu21 Furthermore, an England-based study found both interpersonal racism and perceived experiences of racism were associated with an increased risk of common mental health disorders and symptoms of psychosis among adults aged 16–74 years.Reference Karlsen, Nazroo, Mckenzie, Bhui and Weich22
Given these findings, it seems highly likely that experiences of racism will also have significant impacts on the mental health of children and young people as they are in a particularly important life stage with respect to their development of self and identityReference Knowles, Gayer-Anderson, Beards, Blakey, Davis and Lowis23 and vulnerability to the development of mental health problems.Reference Heard-Garris, Cale, Camaj, Hamati and Dominguez2 Additionally, children's lives are heavily linked to experiences with and of those around them (including peers, family members and trusted others). This cross-generational link has been found between maternal experiences of interpersonal racism, specifically discrimination, and infant cortisol level; more frequent maternal reports of discrimination predicted higher cortisol levels among Black infants.Reference Dismukes, Shirtcliff, Jones, Zeanah, Theall and Drury24
Where systematic reviews have been conducted that have demonstrated significant associations between racism and poor mental health among children and young peopleReference Heard-Garris, Cale, Camaj, Hamati and Dominguez2,Reference Priest, Paradies, Trenerry, Truong, Karlsen and Kelly25 they have predominantly included studies conducted in the USA. One review, for example, identified a consistent and strong relationship between racial discrimination and negative mental health conditions such as anxiety. They also found a negative relationship between racial discrimination and positive mental health indicators, such as self-worth.Reference Priest, Paradies, Trenerry, Truong, Karlsen and Kelly25 However, the kinds of racism faced and its impact on mental health is likely to vary depending on the country. For example, differences in the association between racism and mental health have been found between Australia and the UK and between ethnic groups within these countries.Reference Terhaag, Fitzsimons, Daraganova and Patalay26 Specifically, this study found that ethnic minority children in Australia experienced more victimisation compared with those in the UK. Furthermore, among ethnic groups in Australia, indigenous children had poorer mental health, while in the UK, Pakistani and Bangladeshi children had poorer mental health.Reference Terhaag, Fitzsimons, Daraganova and Patalay26 With a lack of research focusing on the associations between racism and mental health in children and young people, and particularly the specific experiences in the UK, we set out to identify the broad existing literature on the association between experiences of racism and mental health in children and young people in the UK.
Method
This review adhered to Dobbins’Reference Dobbins27 rapid review criteria. The review process included the following: Identifying the research topic and question, creating search terms to identify the literature, selecting relevant studies, extracting data and finally, analysing and summarising the results. We included studies conducted in the UK between 2000 and 2020; searches were run in December 2020. Searches were re-run in June 2022 for studies conducted in the UK between December 2020 and June 2022, this was done to ensure that the review was up to date.
Inclusion criteria were: (a) peer-reviewed publication containing original data; (b) UK-based research; (c) included examination of associations between mental health and experiences of direct or indirect racism (quantitative or qualitative); (d) inclusion of an assessment of mental health outcomes; (e) participant ages up to and including 18 years of age or (if the range went beyond 18) with a mean age of 17 years or less.
The following databases were searched: Web of Science, PsychINFO, Embase, ERIC, Scopus and Medline. Search strategies for individual databases were developed by the primary reviewer (F.T.G.) with the overarching terms being ‘UK’, ‘mental health’, ‘children’ and ‘racism’. With the help of a research librarian, these terms were expanded to encompass all potential variations and combinations of keywords within these terms (see Supplementary Appendix available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.836). Keywords were also identified through previously published studies on the topic.
All identified studies were uploaded to Zotero for duplication removal. The remaining studies were then uploaded to Rayyan for screening; further duplications were independently checked for and removed before screening began by F.T.G. Using Rayyan, all studies were independently screened for inclusion and exclusion according to the criteria by the lead reviewer (F.T.G.). Screening followed two steps: (a) title and abstract screen for potentially eligible studies; and (b) full text screen to confirm studies for inclusion. A subset of 30 studies was screened independently at the abstract and title stage by a second reviewer (Z.Z.) in order dually to discuss/clarify any potential issues with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The remaining titles/abstracts were then independently screened by both reviewers to exclude any clearly irrelevant studies. Any studies considered by either reviewer potentially to contain relevant data were put forward to the full text screen. All full texts were then reviewed by the two independent reviewers (F.T.G., Z.Z.). Any disagreements on whether a study meets the study inclusion criteria were resolved through discussions with a third author (C.C.). The data were then extracted independently by both reviewers (F.T.G., Z.Z.), followed by a discussion to compare any potential differences.
Results
Description of included studies
As shown in Fig. 1, in total eight studies were included in this review, with five providing quantitative data and three providing qualitative data. Details related to the study characteristics are provided in Table 2.
ns, not significant; PM2.5 refers to minuscule particles in the air that can be harmful; SDQ, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; TDS, total difficulties score; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; NI, Northern Ireland.
Studies varied widely in terms of who provided the data (parents, youth workers, young people), sample size (from 14 youth workers to 6645 young people), demographic profiles, study region and the focus of the study. Only four of the studies had a specific focus on how racism affects youth mental health.Reference Cassidy, O'Connor, Howe and Warden28,Reference Astell-Burt, Maynard, Lenguerrand and Harding31,Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32,Reference Karamanos, Mudway, Kelly, Beevers, Dajnak and Elia35 The majority of studies (n = 7/8) focused on children and young people aged 10 years or over. Only one study focused on young children under the age of 10 years,Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32 and this specifically explored how racism affected the children's mothers. As shown in Table 2, seven out of eight studies focused on experiences within school settings, with five of these studies also asking about racism both within and outside of school. Four studies used youth self-report for mental health and racism, while one study used parental report and three studies used interviews (parents, youth workers and young people).
Studies providing quantitative data varied in measures of racism, with two Reference Astell-Burt, Maynard, Lenguerrand and Harding31,Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32 asking just one question each regarding racism (‘How common are insults or attacks to do with someone's race or colour?’; ‘Has anyone made you feel bad or hassled you because of your race, skin colour or where you were born?) and one studyReference Karamanos, Mudway, Kelly, Beevers, Dajnak and Elia35 asking both (‘Has anyone made you feel bad or hassled you because of your race, skin colour, or where you were born?’ and ‘Has anyone made you feel bad or hassled you because of your religion?’). One study used both the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and perceived discrimination scale.Reference Cassidy, O'Connor, Howe and Warden28 The latter scale was a combination of two measures, one used byReference Verkuyten36 and the other developed by.Reference Phinney, Madden and Santos37 Youth mental health outcome measures also varied; the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was used in three studiesReference Astell-Burt, Maynard, Lenguerrand and Harding31,Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32,Reference Karamanos, Mudway, Kelly, Beevers, Dajnak and Elia35 and one study used an anonymous self-report open-response questionnaire, in which a reference to bullying was made.Reference Fortune, Sinclair and Hawton30
For two of the qualitative studies, relevant data were secondary to the main aims of the studies.Reference Derrington29,Reference McMullen, Jones, Campbell, McLaughlin, McDade and O'Lynn33 They were included due to one quote in the studies that referred to the effect of racism and racism on young people's mental health. One study explored perceived causes of emotional distress among their participants and was also included due to one quote referring to the effects of racism.Reference O'Neill, Stapley, Stock, Merrick and Humphrey34
Study findings
Four studies directly focused on the effects of racism on the mental health of children and young peopleReference Cassidy, O'Connor, Howe and Warden28,Reference Astell-Burt, Maynard, Lenguerrand and Harding31,Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32,Reference Karamanos, Mudway, Kelly, Beevers, Dajnak and Elia35 and one study focused on the prevention of self-harm among adolescents.Reference Fortune, Sinclair and Hawton30 The four studies that examined youth self-reported mental health symptoms found evidence for a significant direct association between perceived discrimination, reported racism and youth mental health symptoms (anxiety among young women and depression and anxiety among young men,Reference Cassidy, O'Connor, Howe and Warden28 total difficulties in the SDQ,Reference Astell-Burt, Maynard, Lenguerrand and Harding31 and increased conduct problems.Reference Karamanos, Mudway, Kelly, Beevers, Dajnak and Elia35
Bécares et alReference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32 specifically focused on maternal experiences of racism and families’ experiences of unfair treatment, and reported a significant indirect association between maternal experiences and parent reported SDQ scores, which was mediated by self-reported ‘harsh parenting’. Fortune et alReference Fortune, Sinclair and Hawton30 focused on self-harm prevention and found that 6% of the respondents referred to discrimination and racism, and although Asian pupils, compared with the overall sample, were less likely to mention bullying, they tended to highlight racism as a specific form of bullying. The remaining three studies provided qualitative data, although there was just one relevant quote from each that related to how racism affected the mental health of children and young people. Two of these quotes were given by a parent and youth worker, and only one was from a young person.
Discussion
While we identified both quantitative and qualitative data that highlight the potential negative impacts of experiences of racism on young people, the most striking finding from this review is the lack of available literature on the potential mental health impacts of racism on young people in the UK. The lack of research in this area is telling and could reflect a lack of prioritisation in both research and funding on this issue. Only eight studies met our inclusion criteria, and the effects of racism on children and young people's mental health was an incidental finding in four of these studies. Furthermore, three of these studies provided little information on the specific nature of experiences and contexts that might create particular risks for youth mental health and how they should best be addressed. This includes a lack of consideration of how experiences may vary across ethnic and cultural groups among other identity traits. These are important limitations given that studies have shown that experiences of racism vary widely for people within the broad ‘Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic’ category,Reference Goodman, Patel and Leon38 and within ethnic groups, factors such as sex and gender may be associated with different experiences, often referred to as intersectionality. These findings highlight significant gaps that ought to be addressed in future research.
The vast majority of studies that were identified during the searches were conducted outside of the UK, mainly in the USA. Other studies that focused on experiences of racism in the UK did not specifically explore potential effects on participants’ mental health nor provide specific data on those under 18 years.Reference Hackett, Ronaldson, Bhui, Steptoe and Jackson39,Reference Wallace, Nazroo and Bécares40 In addition to the overall lack of studies, there was also a lack of consistency in approaches taken to assess both experiences of racism and youth mental health symptoms, and whether the mental health measures used are appropriate across ethnicities and cultures remains unclear.Reference Richter, Sagatun, Heyerdahl, Oppedal and Røysamb41 The majority of studies also specifically focused on experiences within secondary school settings, particularly experiences of interpersonal racism.
Notably, no studies examined the impact of internalised racism despite a systematic review indicating that internalised racism has been linked to low levels of self-esteem, lower career aspirations, increased feelings of hopelessness and stress, as well as psychological conditions such as depression, anxiety and body dissatisfaction.Reference David, Schroeder and Fernandez42
Furthermore, no studies examined the impact of experiences relating to structural and institutional racism despite young people stressing the impact these experiences can have on their identity and sense of belonging.Reference Adebiyi, Ghezae and Mustafa43,Reference Ghezae, Adebiyi and Mustafa44 As an example, a recurrent negative experience recounted by young people in the UK is police stop and search,Reference Keeling45 which has both interpersonal and institutional elements of racism. While the interaction occurs between individuals (a suspect and an officer), when these individual instances are aggregated, disparities emerge along racial lines, suggesting structural or institutional factors. For instance, ‘Black’ children in England and Wales are 6.5 times more likely to be subjected by police to strip searching, a particularly intrusive form of stop and search, than ‘White’ children.46 ‘Black’ children are also more likely than ‘Asian’ and ‘Mixed’ children to be strip searched.46 Furthermore, young people describe code switching, when an individual will adjust their self-presentation in order to receive outcomes they deem desirable,Reference McCluney, Durkee, Smith, Robotham and Lee47 in response to a breakdown in trust between communities and institutions.Reference Ghezae, Adebiyi and Mustafa44 For example, young people may feel pressured to adjust their self-presentation, or ‘perform,’ in order to protect themselves from, and appear more palatable to, those who might otherwise negatively perceive them. Young people have highlighted that these kinds of behaviours form part of the training and preparation they have been given by their parents, potentially indicating indirect effects of racism and the intergenerational transmission of racial trauma.Reference Ghezae, Adebiyi and Mustafa44,Reference Condon, Barcelona, Ibrahim, Crusto and Taylor48
One study identified in our review highlighted parental experiences of racism as having a potential indirect effect on the mental health of children under the age of 10 years.Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32 In this case, the focus was on maternal experiences of racism and how this affects children's socioemotional development.Reference Bécares, Nazroo and Kelly32 Indeed, looking at the wider literature, a systematic review of the impacts of vicarious racism found a significant association with children's health in almost half of the studies.Reference Heard-Garris, Cale, Camaj, Hamati and Dominguez2 Commonly, the categories of health studies were birth outcomes, socioemotional and mental health. Notably, just over half of the studies failed to find a significant association between vicarious racism and child health. However, this may be due to several factors, such as measurement and methodological variability. Heard-Garris et alReference Heard-Garris, Cale, Camaj, Hamati and Dominguez2 commented on the need for more studies exploring the relationship between child health and vicarious racism given that children's exposure to racism can occur in various ways, such as through experiences of peers, caregivers and through the media.
Strengths of this study include our adherence to guidelines for rapid reviews; however, restricting our searches to peer-reviewed studies means we may have excluded research published in other formats and our findings have a risk of publication bias. Given the diverse approaches used, we did not conduct quality ratings for individual studies. Our focus on the UK was deliberate; it inevitably reduces generalisation to other settings but also highlights the need for specific consideration of similar questions in other countries where knowledge may be equally limited.
The findings from this review underline the urgent need for research to understand further the mental health impacts of racism on children and young people, and the moderators and mediators of their effects in order ultimately to guide the (co-)development of effective, culturally and developmentally appropriate interventions to promote good mental health and to treat and prevent mental health problems. Going forward, there is a clear need for validated measures of experiences of racism that are appropriate across cultures and are available in multiple languages to promote consistency in measurement across studies. In one meta-analysis, nine different exposure instruments were used to measure self-reported racism across 138 studies.Reference Paradies9 Critically, future research should also be underpinned by anti-racism research principles to ensure it increases awareness and addresses the issuesReference Thomas, Amini, Floyd, Willard, Wossenseged and Keller49 without unintentionally bringing harm.
A number of research priorities arise from this review. First, there is a clear need for more extensive robust evaluation of the association between racism and the mental health of children and young people in the UK. In particular, there should be exploration of the impacts of vicarious, systemic and institutional racism, and there should be particular emphasis on children under the age of 10 years. It will also be imperative to take into account intersectional factors such as sex and gender, as well as a consideration of differences within minority ethnic groups, avoiding the pitfalls associated with the use of terms such as ‘BAME’ which group together people and communities that may have had disparate experiences. Despite the small number of studies identified, the breadth of measurement approaches, operationalisation of racism and methods of categorising individuals (e.g. on the basis of race, ethnicity and ancestry) is striking. Ongoing research would benefit from the development of a universal framework for measuring experiences of racism in order to improve consistency of measurement and reporting across studies.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.836
Data availability
Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author contributions
F.T.G. and C.C. contributed to all aspects of the research and manuscript. Z.Z. supported with data collection. F.T.G., Z.Z., A.J., K.A., K.B., A.A. and C.C. contributed to interpretation of results and drafting/reviewing the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Emerging Minds Mental Health Research network internship awarded to F.T.G. C.C., A.J. and K.A. were also supported by the UKRI Emerging Minds Research Network Plus. C.C. is supported by the Oxford and Thames Valley National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration and the Oxford Health NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Declaration of interest
K.B. is a member of the BJPsych Open editorial board as a Deputy Editor; however, they did not take part in the review or decision-making process of this paper. There are no other declarations of interest.
Transparency declaration
The lead author, F.T.G., declares that the manuscript is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study being reported.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.