Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:15:43.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving quality and assessment of referrals to the Enfield Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team (ECRHTT)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Margarita Kousteni*
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
John Cousins
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Ajay Mansingh
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Maja Elia
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Yumnah Ras
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Mercedes Chavarri
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Marilia Gougoulaki
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Imo Akande
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Triaging referrals to crisis resolution and home treatment teams is a significant undertaking requiring experienced and dedicated staff. We observed that the volume of inappropriate referrals to ECRHTT was high, and that staff processing these often felt inexperienced or lacking in confidence to discharge them back to the referrers and signpost them to appropriate services.

The aims of this quality improvement project (QIP) were:

  1. a) to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals received by the team

  2. b) to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals accepted by the team

This would significantly improve access and flow to the service and facilitate better patient care.

Method

A pilot study was first completed of the quality (appropriateness/ inappropriateness) and source of all referrals to ECRHTT in January 2019 (n = 177).

Subsequently, the consultant psychiatrist for ECRHTT based himself within the assessment team. He was able to closely monitor the referrals, at the same time as providing medical input to patients at their first point of contact. To evaluate the impact of this intervention, the percentage of inappropriate referrals accepted pre- and post-change was compared by re-auditing all referrals received in February 2019 (n = 175).

Further interventions were instigated to improve referral quality. These included continuation of psychiatric medical input to the assessment team, teaching sessions for GPs and the crisis telephone service, and weekly meetings with psychiatric liaison and community mental health teams (CMHTs). Change was measured by reassessing the quality of all referrals made to ECRHTT in February 2020 (n = 215).

Result

46.9% of inappropriate referrals to ECRHTT were accepted in January 2019 compared to 16.9% in February 2019 following the addition of medical input to the assessment team. The absolute difference was 30% (95% CI: 14%–44%, p < 0.001).

71% of referrals from GPs were inappropriate in January 2019 compared to 36% in February 2020 post-intervention (difference 35%, 95% CI: 8.84%–55.4%, p < 0.05). Inappropriate referrals from CMHTs decreased from 55.5% to 12% (difference 43.5%, 95% CI: 9.5%–70.3%, p < 0.05). Overall, the percentage of inappropriate referrals fell from 38% to 27.4%, a difference of 10.6% (95% CI: 1.3%–19.8%, p < 0.05). The percentage of inappropriate referrals from liaison teams did not change significantly.

Conclusion

This piece of work shows that better engagement with referral sources significantly improved the quality of referrals made to ECRHTT. Interventions included medical input at the point of referral, teaching sessions for general practitioners as well as ongoing liaison with referring teams.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.