Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:39:58.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Of Course, Breaking Bad News Is Not Just for Patients: A Quality Improvement Project Survey to Explore How Staff Are Informed of Patient Deaths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Sian Davies
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Kishan Pankhania*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Imran Waheed
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Mental health professionals are very likely to experience a patient death at least once in their careers. The Royal College of Psychiatrists published a framework for supporting mental health staff following the death of a patient by suicide. It states that ‘how the news about a patient's suicide is imparted influences the emotional impact of the death and is therefore very important'. We sought to explore how healthcare professionals are informed about patient deaths within Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust.

Methods

A 25-question survey was devised to explore how staff have been informed about patient deaths and the impact it had on them. This was emailed to all grades of doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals within the trust and results were collected over 11 days.

Results

83 healthcare professionals completed the survey.72 respondents had experienced a patient death within the trust. Of 72, 48.6% of respondents felt they had not been informed about their most recent patient death in a sensitive manner. There was wide variability in the method by which staff were first informed. 27.8% of respondents first learned of the patient's death via an email from the trust lawyers, patient safety team or another party. Of these 20, 17 felt they had not been informed in a sensitive manner. 63.9% (n = 46) reported that they had not been signposted to any support. Qualitative data suggested that the way in which people were informed had a wide-ranging impact. Many respondents felt shocked and upset. With hindsight, people would have appreciated being informed face to face and being given time to reflect. Of the total 83 responses, 82% (n = 68) felt that there should be a specific policy about how staff are informed about patient deaths.

Conclusion

Results from this survey demonstrate a large scope for improvement in the way that staff are informed of patient deaths. Using these results, we will generate change ideas for a quality improvement project which aims to inform staff more sensitively about patient deaths. Feedback suggested implementation of a new protocol to guide team managers and consultants on how to inform staff; it may help to standardise the process and the support provided. Patient deaths have a significant impact on the mental health of staff; communicating this matter compassionately may help to alleviate immediate feelings of distress and mediate the long-term impact on staff wellbeing and satisfaction.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.