Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:29:19.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-Audit of Blood Monitoring of Lithium in Outpatients of Working Age Under Dudley Mental Health Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Peter Bridgewater*
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Praveen Kumar
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Lithium remains the first line mood stabilising therapy recommended by NICE for Bipolar Disorder and an important treatment option for augmentation of the treatment of Depression. Lithium has a strict monitoring requirement due to long term impact on Renal, Thyroid function and risk of toxicity due to a narrow therapeutic range. This Re-Audit aimed to assess improvement in Lithium Blood monitoring in working age adults in Dudley following an initial 2021 audit.

Methods

We used the standards set by NICE CG185- Bipolar Disorder Assessment and Management. We agreed a standard of 3 monthly monitoring of lithium levels due to the number of indications for 3 monthly monitoring to ensure safest practice. We also agreed to standards for 6 monthly monitoring of Urea and Electrolytes (U&Es) and Thyroid Function Tests (TFTs). An additional standard was agreed that at every outpatient review Lithium blood results should be reviewed and documented. A sample of 40 patients was gathered from the 8 outpatient sector teams. We used Rio notes system for demographic, diagnosis and clinical information and blood results systems EMIS and ICE for blood results over a period of November 2021- November 2022.

Results

There was a noted minor improvement to compliance with 3 monthly monitoring, overall increasing from 10% to 17.5%, but this result is still poor. The number of patients who had 4 or more Lithium blood tests over the 12 month period was more of a positive increase, to 32.5% from 17.5% in the previous audit cycle. There was also an improvement in the mean number of lithium blood tests per patient from 2.67 to 3.3. For U&Es 90% of patients were monitored 6 monthly while for TFTs 85% of patients were monitored 6 monthly. There was a slight reduction in documentation of blood results at clinic review, reducing to 62.5% from 67.5% in the initial audit.

Conclusion

While the progress is positive, the results are still far below where the trust would like to be. We considered whether frequency of outpatient review, poor awareness of 3 monthly monitoring standards and a lack of formal system to remind or ensure patients are monitored appropriately. It was agreed that measures to ensure compliance such as a lithium blood monitoring clinic may be useful to improve compliance with monitoring.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.