Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:57:53.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Trainees’ Current Likelihood of Raising Concerns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Vicki Ibbett*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Manjinder Padda
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Katie Thomas
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Rajendra Harsh
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Sian Davies
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Tabassum Mirza
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Katherine Hubbard
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Ainy Gul
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Khadija Kulman
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Marium Fatima
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Amy Shaw
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Ella Kulman
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Razan Saeed
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Shay-Anne Pantall
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
Ruth Scally
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT), Birmingham, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Raising concerns is a duty for all doctors. However, a scoping exercise within a large mental health Trust demonstrated that trainees experience difficulties in raising both patient safety and training concerns. As part of a trainee-led quality improvement (QI) project within this Trust, our aim was to develop a pulse survey to capture the current likelihood of trainees raising concerns and factors influencing this.

Methods

An online survey was developed using ‘plan do study act’ (PDSA) methodology. The initial draft was informed by data from the Autumn 2021 scoping exercise. The survey was refined using a collaborative trainee-led approach. It was tested by trainees involved in the QI project followed by two other trainees and was revised accordingly.

Trainees across all training grades were invited to complete the survey through various communication channels. The pulse survey will be repeated monthly with a two-week response window.

Results

Ten trainees out of 103 responded to the first pulse survey open from 18th to 31st January 2023 (response rate 9.7%). Seven respondents were core trainees and three were higher trainees.

Respondents were more likely to raise patient safety concerns than training concerns (average score of 3.8 out of 5, where 5 equals ‘very likely’, versus 3.4 out of 5 respectively). Of the three respondents who had experienced a patient safety concern in the past 2 weeks, only two had used any existing process to raise it. These data were replicated for training concerns.

No respondents were confident that effective action would be taken if they raised a training concern, while less than half of respondents were confident that effective action would be taken if it were a patient safety concern.

The reasons for the low response rate are likely varied. However, there may be some similar underlying reasons for low engagement in surveys and low engagement in raising concerns. Given this, a more negative picture of trainees’ likelihood of raising concerns may have been portrayed if more trainees engaged in the survey.

Conclusion

Engaging trainees to provide insight into their likelihood of raising concerns is challenging. Despite the low response rate, this initial pulse survey demonstrated that trainees continue to experience barriers to raising concerns. PDSA methodology will continue to be used to optimise the monthly pulse survey response rate. The key QI outcome measures will also be integrated into pre and post intervention surveys as a pragmatic approach to evaluate specific change ideas.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.