Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T21:34:36.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proposed expansion for the iron die found in, or before, 1889 in the City of London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

R. P. Wright
R. P. Wright
Affiliation:
5 Victoria Terrace, Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Britannia , Volume 15 , November 1984 , pp. 257 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © R. P. Wright 1984. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

183 EE vii 177C RCHM London iii, 175 no. 42. Guildhall, Cat. (ed. 2, 1908), 54 no. 114, pl. xvii, 9. Originally in Guildhall Museum; now in the Museum of London. J. E. Price sent an impression to F. Haverfield on 26 Sept. 1889, presumably as a new discovery.Google Scholar

184 As no agreement has been reached on the expansion of the four or more types of tile-stamp from London, reading P-PR-BR, this legend has not been discussed in this note. See CIL vii, 1235; RCHM London iii, 176 no. 55Google Scholar; JRS xxvi (1936), 265 no. 5Google Scholar; B.M. Guide Rom. Brit. (1951), 58 no. 6.Google Scholar

185 JRS xxvi (1936) 265 no. 5Google Scholar; B.M. Guide Rom. Brit. (1951), 48 fig. 22, 5 (giving both faces)Google Scholar; Frere, , Britannia (ed. 1, 1967) 198; ed. 2 (1974), 229Google Scholar; Merrifield, , Roman London, 42, pl. 7.Google Scholar

186 Birley, A. R., Fasti of Roman Britain (Oxford, 1981), 168–72.Google Scholar

187 EE iv 707. Smith, Roach, Coll. Ant. vii, 68 with figure.Google Scholar

188 JRS xlv (1955), 146 no. 11Google Scholar, Wright, , Cumb. & Westm. AAST liv (1954), 102 with fig. RCHM York I, 133, no. 144.Google Scholar

188 Smith, Roach, Coll. Ant. (1854), iii, 197 pl. xxxii, 2Google Scholar. JRS xlv (1955), 147, no. 11 near end of paragraph. Now in the British Museum; with the emblem of the bull it reads PBI, although broken along the line where the cord had run.Google Scholar

190 There are various incuse countermarks on lead, notably for the Socifetas) Novaec. on those from the Mendips (PSA2 xxxi (1918), 37Google Scholar; JRS liii (1963), 162, no. 12.)Google Scholar

191 Hirschfeld, , Die kaiserliche Verwaltungsbeamten (Berlin, 3rd ed. 1963), 176.Google Scholar

192 CIL vii, 1208, 1214; EEix, 1266.

193 Richmond, , Cumb. & Westm. AAST xxxvi (1936), 109, III–16, 118, 121 fig. 2 A 1.Google Scholar

194 Dale, , PSA xxxi (1918), 37.Google Scholar

196 CIL vii, 1203; EE vii 1120.

196 CIL vii, 1206.

197 JRS xxxi (1941), 145, pl. xx.Google Scholar

198 CIL vii, 1200, EE ix, p. 640. CIL vii, 1199 etc.

199 Tin, EE ix, 1262. Pewter, CIL vii, 1221, a, b, EEix, 1263. RCHM London iii 43, 175 no. 35, fig. 85.