Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T17:47:05.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Risk Premium on Ordinary Shares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

A.D. Wilkie
Affiliation:
Dennington, Ridgeway, Horsell, Woking, Surrey, GU21 4QR, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1483 725984; Fax: +44 (0)1483 725984; E-mail: davidwilkie@inqa.com

Abstract

The risk premium on ordinary shares is investigated, by studying the total returns on ordinary shares, and on both long-term and short-term fixed-interest investments over the period 1919 to 1994, and by analysing the various components of that return. The total returns on ordinary shares exceeded those on fixed-interest investments by over 5% p.a. on a geometric mean basis and by over 7% p.a. on an arithmetic mean basis, but it is argued that these figures are misleading, because most of the difference can be accounted for by the fact that price inflation turned out to be about 4.5% p.a. over the period, whereas investors had been expecting zero inflation.

Quotations from contemporary authors are brought forward to demonstrate what contemporary attitudes were. Simulations are used along with the Wilkie stochastic asset model to show what the results would be if investors make various assumptions about the future, but the true model turns out to be different from what they expected. The differences between geometric means of the data and arithmetic means are shown to correspond to differences between using medians or means of the distribution of future returns, and it is suggested that, for discounting purposes, medians are the better measure.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Binns, J.D. (1965). Institutional investment. Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Dimson, E. (1993). Appraisal techniques. Proceedings of the Capital Projects Conference, 25 May 1993. Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Douglas, C.M. (1930). The statistical groundwork of investment policy. T.F.A. 12, 173228.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1907). The rate of interest. The Macmillan Company, New York.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. The Macmillan Company, New York. Reprinted (Kelley), 1955.Google Scholar
Grubb, M. (1993). A second generation of low inflation. Professional Investor. Dec 1993/Jan 1994, 5357.Google Scholar
Jones, P.D. (1993). The expected return on United Kingdom equities and an implication for pension fund valuations. J.I.A. 120, 253309.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.R. & Deane, P. (1962). Abstract of British historical statistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
PDFM Limited (1994). Pension fund indicators. PDFM Limited, London.Google Scholar
Thornton, P.N. & Wilson, A.F. (1992). A realistic approach to pension funding. J.I.A. 119, 229312.Google Scholar
Whyte, L.G. (1949). Principles of finance and investment. 2 volumes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A.D. (1986a). A stochastic investment model for actuarial use. T.F.A. 39, 341403.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A.D. (1986b). Some applications of stochastic investment models. J.I.A.S.S. 29, 2551.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A.D. (1987). Stochastic investment models — theory and applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 6, 6583.Google Scholar
Wilkje, A.D. (1992). Stochastic investment models for XXIst Century actuaries. Transactions of the 24th International Congress of Actuaries, Montreal, 5, 119137.Google Scholar
Huang, C. & Litzenberger, R.H. (1988). Foundations for Financial Economics. North-Holland, New York.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony Sir (1994). The British Library and the St. Paneras Building. The British Library.Google Scholar