Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:33:22.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance as Experience: the problem of assessment criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Peter Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Examination criteria, as distinct from guidelines regulating content and presentation, are problematic as applied to musical performance. Given the epistemological gap between musical and conceptual thought, forms of words are not readily available to distinguish objectively between the good and the mediocre performance. Criteria need therefore to be designed to complement the examiner's subjective response rather than substitute for it, and analytical concepts prove to be less reliable than ‘aesthetic terms’ (Sibley). In the context of Western art-music, the ‘good’ musical performance will be one that proposes its own ‘possible world’ (Bruner), situated within the larger ‘world’ of culturally contingent aesthetic values. Aesthetic terms provide the best means we have of access to the experiential world of performed music.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 1997 , pp. 271 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blum, D. (1977). Casals and the Art of Interpretation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, N. (1990). Music Imagination and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. (1983). On Deconstruction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. (1995). Shaping Time: music, the brain and performance. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1988). Music on Deaf Ears. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, D. & Russ, M. (1996). ‘Peer Assessment in Performance Studies’ in British Journal of Music Education, 13, 1, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. (1995). ‘Play school: on how to reconcile performance and analysis’ in The Musical Times, 06 1995, p. 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivy, P. (1995). Authenticities: philosophical reflections on musical performance. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyas, C. (1992). ‘The Evaluation of Art’ in Hanfling, O. (ed.), Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell and the Open University.Google Scholar
Matravers, D. (1996). ‘Aesthetic Concepts and Aesthetic Experiences’ in British Journal of Aesthetics, 36, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitias, M.H. (1992). ‘Dewey's Theory of Expression’ in Journal of Aesthetic Education, 26, 3, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozart, L. (1756) trans. Knocker, Editha (1948). A Treatise on the Fundamental Principles of Violin Playing. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pople, A. (1994). ‘Systems and Strategies: functions and limits of analysis’ in Pople, A. (ed.), Theory, analysis and meaning in music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1993). ‘Musical Standards as Function of Musical Accompaniment’ in Krausz, M. (ed.), The Interpretation of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sibley, F. (1959). ‘Aesthetic concepts’ in Neill, A. & Ridley, A. (eds), The Philosophy of Art, Readings Ancient and Modern. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
Sibley, F. (1993). ‘Making Music our Own’ in Krausz, M. (ed.), The Interpretation of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1989). Real Presences. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Sweeney-Turner, S. (1995). ‘Speaking without tongues’ in The Musical Times, 04 1995, p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. (1992). ‘Some technical issues in assessment: a user's guide’ in British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 2, 3, 11.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1956). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar