Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:04:36.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Daily food intake and digestibility in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

T. Larsen ,
Karin ØstergÅrd ,
Inge Hansen ,
K. E. Bach Knudsen  and
B. O. Eggum
T. Larsen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Foulum, P.O. Box 39, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Karin ØstergÅrd
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Foulum, P.O. Box 39, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Inge Hansen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Foulum, P.O. Box 39, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
K. E. Bach Knudsen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Foulum, P.O. Box 39, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
B. O. Eggum
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Foulum, P.O. Box 39, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present work with growing rats was undertaken to study the effect of daily food intake (DFI) on true protein digestibility (TD), and apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM), energy (DE), starch, soluble dietary fibre (SDF) and insoluble dietary fibre (IDF). The design involved two different dietary combinations, barley + rapeseed meal (diet 1) and oats + wheat bran (diet 2). A slight but significantly negative relationship was seen between DFI and TD on diet 1 while no such relationship was found on diet 2. Although significant, DFI influenced DM digestibility of both diets only slightly. A similar situation could also be seen for the effect of DFI on DE. The digestibility of starch was significantly affected by DFI on both diets even though the lowest values were as high as 0.994. SDF digestibility (fermentability) was not influenced by DFI when the rats were given diet 1, while there was a significant negative effect of DFI on digestibility of SDF when diet 2 was given. The digestibility (fermentability) of IDF was not affected by DFI on either of the two diets. The results confirm the existence of a weak negative relationship between DFI and digestibility of a range of nutrients although the effect seems to be only marginal and of no importance under practical feeding conditions

Keywords

Feeding levelDigestibilityRat
Type
Diet and Gastrointestinal Function
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 29 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Asp, N.-G., Johansson, C. G., Hallmer, H. & Siljestrøm, M. (1983). A rapid enzymatic method for assay of insoluble and soluble dietary fibre. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 31, 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis. 11th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E., Å man, P. & Eggum, B. O. (1987 a). Nutritive value of Danish-grown barley varieties. I. Carbohydrates and other major constituents. Journal of Cereal Science 6, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E., Eggum, B. O. & Jacobsen, I. (1987 b). Nutritive value of Danish-grown barley varieties. II. Effects of carbohydrate composition on digestibility of energy and protein. Journal of Cereal Science 6, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beames, R. M. & Eggum, B. O. (1981). The effect of type and level of protein, fibre and starch on nitrogen excretion patterns in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants, 2nd ed. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Cunningham, H. M., Friend, D. W. & Nicholson, J. W. G, (1962). The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility, and nutritive value of cellulose. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 42, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donangelo, C. M. & Eggum, B. O. (1985). Comparative effects of wheat bran and barley husk on nutrient utilization in rats. 1. Protein and energy. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 741–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggum, B. O. (1973). A study of certain factors influencing protein utilization in rats and pigs. National Institute of Animal Science, Report no. 406, p. 173. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Eggum, B. O. & Beames, R. M. (1986). Use of laboratory animals as models for studies on nutrition of domestic animals. In Laboratory Animals, pp. 265–290. [Ruitenberg, E. J. and Peters, P. W. J., editors]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
Haydon, K. D., Knabe, D. A. & Thanksley, T. D. Jr (1984). Effect of level of feed intake on nitrogen, amino acid and energy digestibilities measured at the end of the small intestine and over the total digestive tract. Journal of Animal Science 59, 717–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, A., Jørgensen, H. & Fernandez, J. A. (1983). Maintenance requirement and the energy value of different diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 10, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, M. & Asp, N.-G. (1985). Dietary fibre fermentation in the rat intestinal tract: effect of adaptation period, protein and fibre levels, and particle size. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 635–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, M., Asp, N.-G., Cummings, J. & Wiggins, H. (1986). Fermentation of dietary fibre in the intestinal tract: comparison between man and rat. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, M., Asp, N.-G., Pedersen, B. & Eggum, B. O. (1985). Fermentation of dietary fibre in the intestinal tract of rats – a comparison of flours with different extraction rates from six cereals. Journal of Cereal Science 3, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raczynski, G., Eggum, B. O. & Chwalibog, A. (1982). The effect of dietary composition on transit time in rats. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung and Futtermittelkunde 47, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, F. X. & Kirchgessner, M. (1984). Verdaulichkeit der Energie and Rohnährstoffe beim Schwein in Abhängigkeit von Fütterungsnivcau and Lebengewicht. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 51, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (1985). User's Guide. Statistics. Gary, N.C.: Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Just, A. & Jørgensen, H. (1982). The effect of feed intake on ileal and fecal availabilities in pigs. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 48, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Jeraci, J., Foose, T., Wrick, K. L. & Ehler, F. (1982). Comparative fermentation of fibre in man and other animals. In Fibre in Human and Animal Nutrition, pp. 75–80 [Wallace, G. and Bell, L., editors]. Queenstown: The Royal Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Wrick, K. L., Robertson, J. B., Van Soest, P. J., Lewis, B. A., Rivers, J. M., Roe, D. A. & Hackler, L. R. (1983). The influence of dietary fibre source on human intestinal transit and stool output. Journal of Nutrition 113, 14641479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed