Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:55:35.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of β-carotene-rich tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) on cell growth inhibition in HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2008

Paola Palozza
Affiliation:
Institute of General Pathology, Catholic University School of Medicine, largo F. Vito, Roma, Italy
Diana Bellovino*
Affiliation:
National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition, via Ardeatina 546, Roma, Italy
Rossella Simone
Affiliation:
Institute of General Pathology, Catholic University School of Medicine, largo F. Vito, Roma, Italy
Alma Boninsegna
Affiliation:
Institute of General Pathology, Catholic University School of Medicine, largo F. Vito, Roma, Italy
Francesco Cellini
Affiliation:
Metapontum Agrobios, Metaponto (MT), Italy
Giovanni Monastra
Affiliation:
National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition, via Ardeatina 546, Roma, Italy
Sancia Gaetani
Affiliation:
National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition, via Ardeatina 546, Roma, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Diana Bellovino, fax +39 06 51494550, email bellovino@inran.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) tomatoes, obtained by modulating carotenogenesis via genetic engineering, contain a large amount of β-carotene, as clearly visible by their intense orange colour. In the present study we have subjected tlcy-b tomatoes to an in vitro simulated digestion and analysed the effects of digestate on cell proliferation. To this aim we used HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells, grown in monolayers, as a model. Digested tomatoes were diluted (20 ml, 50 ml and 100 ml/l) in culture medium and added to the cells for different incubation times (24 h, 48 h and 72 h). Inhibition of cell growth by tomato digestate was dose-dependent and resulted from an arrest of cell cycle progression at the G0/G1 and G2/M phase and by apoptosis induction. A down-regulation of cyclin D1, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl expression was observed. We also found that heat treatment of samples before digestion enhanced β-carotene release and therefore cell growth inhibition. To induce with purified β-carotene solubilised in tetrahydrofuran the same cell growth inhibition obtained with the tomato digestate, a higher amount of the carotenoid was necessary, suggesting that β-carotene micellarised during digestion is utilised more efficiently by the cells, but also that other tomato molecules, reasonably made available during digestion, may be present and cooperate with β-carotene in promoting cell growth arrest.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Retinol (vitamin A1) and its metabolites are essential in a wide range of physiological regulatory processes(Reference Nau and Blaner1). At the molecular and cellular level, this regulation involves the control of cell proliferation and differentiation through retinoid-dependent effects on gene expression(Reference Blomhoff and Blomhoff2). Vitamin A deficiency is still a public health problem worldwide(Reference Sporn, Roberts and Goodman3, Reference West4). Since animals are not able to synthesise retinoids de novo, they must derive them from dietary vitamin A and provitamin A carotenoids. β-Carotene is the most potent precursor of vitamin A, and therefore efforts to manipulate the genetic background of plants widely used as food to produce β-carotene have received considerable attention(Reference Ye, Al-Babili and Kloti5Reference Paine, Shipton and Chaggar7). Tomato fruit is characterised by the high content of lycopene that, although not a vitamin A precursor, can be readily cyclised to β-carotene by the plant enzyme lycopene β-cyclase. Some authors(Reference D'Ambrosio, Giorio and Marino8) have succeeded in modulating the carotenogenesis in tomato fruit to induce accumulation of β-carotene. Tomato plants were transformed with tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) cDNA under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, and acquired the ability of converting almost all lycopene contained in the fruits into β-carotene. β-Carotene is not only a vitamin A precursor, but performs in animals other functions related to its chemical structure, mainly acting as an antioxidant(Reference Krinsky and Johnson9, Reference Stahl and Sies10). The consumption of a diet rich in fruit and vegetables, and therefore in carotenoids, has been associated with a decreased risk of certain types of cancer and cardiovascular disease(Reference Bendich and Olson11, Reference Giovannucci12). Moreover, tomatoes contain not only lycopene, but also other carotenoids, vitamins and other molecules that, possibly in combination, can contribute to their positive effects on health.

Human intestinal cells cultured in vitro represent very useful models to study the effects of carotenoids on the barrier between the external world and the inside of the human organism(Reference Ranaldi, Bellovino and Palozza13). In a previous study(Reference Palozza, Serini and Boninsegna14) we utilised an in vitro model consisting of the adenocarcinoma colon cells HT-29 and HCT-116, that still exhibit several morphological and biochemical characteristics of intestinal cells and that accumulate carotenoids, to investigate the potential mechanisms underlying the anti-tumoural effects of tomatoes reported in the literature(Reference Campbell, Canene-Adams and Lindshield15, Reference Canene-Adams, Campbell and Zaripheh16). In order to deliver tomatoes to cells in culture, an in vitro digestion procedure mimicking the physiological in vivo function has been adapted and utilised(Reference Garrett, Failla and Sarama17). The resulting digestate was then added to the cell cultures at different concentrations and for various lengths of times.

The aim of the study reported in the present paper was to utilise HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells cultured in monolayers to investigate the effects of the β-carotene-rich tomato tlcy-b digestates on cell growth and on the expression of genes that regulate the cell cycle and apoptosis, in order to understand the molecular mechanisms that govern cell growth inhibition by β-carotene liberated during digestion together with other molecules from the food matrix represented by the β-carotene-rich tlcy-b tomato.

The results reported demonstrate that the molecules liberated from digested tlcy-b tomatoes by in vitro simulated digestion inhibit the growth of HT-29 colon cancer cells by interfering with cell cycle progression and apoptosis, in particular by modulating the expression of some key regulator proteins. To induce the same rate of cell growth inhibition with purified β-carotene solubilised in tetrahydrofuran, HT-29 cells must be treated with a higher amount of β-carotene; it is therefore evident that β-carotene provided as tlcy-b digestate is more active in the anti-proliferative action on HT-29 cells than purified β-carotene, either for the efficient micellarisation that takes place during digestion, and for the presence and cooperation of other molecules(Reference Jacobs and Tapsell18).

Materials and methods

Preparation of tomato samples and in vitro simulated digestion

The GM tlcy-b tomato was obtained by transformation of the Red Setter tomato with Agrobacterium tumefaciens, harbouring the tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) cDNA, under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. The transgenic tomato fruits acquired the ability to convert almost all lycopene into β-carotene, and to increase the total carotenoid content(Reference D'Ambrosio, Giorio and Marino8). To prepare samples, tlcy-b frozen tomatoes were chopped and homogenised with a B-400 Buchi mixer (Buchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland).

All manipulations with tomato samples were performed under subdued lighting and in amber glass bottles to minimise the destruction of carotenoids. Samples of 1 g homogenised tomato were mixed with 1·8 ml saline (140 mm-NaCl, 5 mm-KCl, 150 μm-butylated hydroxytoluene in tetrahydrofuran), and then hand-homogenised in a Teflon/glass Potter homogeniser. In vitro simulated digestion was performed according to Garrett et al. (Reference Garrett, Failla and Sarama17) with modifications. Briefly, after homogenisation, samples were acidified to pH 2·0 with 1 m-HCl before the addition of 50 μl of pepsin, from porcine stomach mucosa (0·2 g pepsin in 5 ml of 0·1 m-HCl), and samples were incubated in a shaking water-bath for 60 min at 37°C. After gastric digestion, the pH was raised to 6·9 with 1 m-NaHCO3. Intestinal digestion was simulated by the addition of 200 μl of pancreatin–bile solution from porcine pancreas (0·45 g porcine bile extract and 0·075 g pancreatin in 37·5 ml of 0·1 m-NaHCO3) and incubated in a shaking water-bath at 37°C for 120 min. The pH of the samples was then adjusted to 7·5. A sample of homogenate was subjected to heat treatment before gastric digestion by boiling for 15 min in a water-bath.

At the end of the digestion procedure, samples were centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C in a Sorvall SS-34 angle rotor, and the supernatant fractions were collected and stored at − 80°C.

Cell culture

HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD, USA) were grown in minimum essential medium. Cells were maintained in log phase by seeding them twice per week at the density of 3 × 105 cells/ml at 37°C under a 5 % CO2–air atmosphere. The medium was supplemented with 10 % (v/v) fetal calf serum (Flow, Irvine, North Ayrshire, UK) and 2 mm-glutamine and was not further replaced throughout the experiment. Experiments were routinely carried out on triplicate cultures. After the incubation, cells were harvested and quadruplicate haemocytometer counts were performed. The trypan blue dye exclusion method was used to evaluate the percentage of viable cells.

The Caco-2 cell line was obtained from the ATCC. The cells were grown and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) without pyruvate, containing 25 mm-glucose and NaHCO3 (3·7 g/l) (DMEM; Biochrom, KG, Berlin, Germany), supplemented with 4 mml-glutamine (Euroclone, Wetherby, West Yorks, UK) and 1 % non-essential amino acids (Euroclone). Cells were left to differentiate for 15 d after confluence. Differentiated Caco-2 cells were incubated for 24 h in the presence or in the absence of tcly-b tomato digestate (100 ml/l). Cells were then removed from the dishes, stained by trypan blue and counted under a microscope for viable and dead cells.

Cell growth-inhibition assay

Tomato digestates were serially diluted in cell culture medium as reported in the figure legends. Cells were seeded in twenty-four-well plates with 3 × 104 cells/well and maintained for 24 h before any treatment to facilitate their adhesion on the well. The control group consisted of cells treated with the same amount of digestion mixture, for example, proteolytic and lypolytic enzymes without tomato, diluted with culture medium and of cells without any treatment. Since no differences in terms of viability, cell cycle, caspase activity and cell cycle-related proteins were found between the two control groups, control cells are referred to cells without any treatment. At the time indicated, cells were removed from the wells, stained with trypan blue and counted under a microscope for viable and dead cells.

Cell cycle analysis

Cell cycle distribution was analysed by flow cytometry, as previously described(Reference Hedren, Diaz and Svanberg19). Samples of 106 cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed in PBS and fixed with ice-cold 70 % ethanol. The cells were incubated at 4°C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 2500 g for 10 min. The pellet was re-suspended in 0·5 ml PBS and 0·5 ml DNA-Prep stain (Coulter Reagents, Miami, FL, USA), containing RNAse (1 g/l) and propidium iodide (50 g/l). All samples were incubated for 30 min in the dark at 4°C. The DNA content of cells stained with propidium iodide was measured with a FACS instrument (EPICS XL-MCL Flow Cytometer; Coulter Electronics, Miami, FL, USA), by using Multicycle AV software (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA, USA).

Apoptosis detection by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling method

The percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL). Briefly, cells were centrifuged, fixed with acetone, and incubated for 5 min with the hybridisation buffer (Boehringer-Mannheim, Germany). Then 2·5 units of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (Tdt) and 100 pmol biotin–dUTP in hybridisation buffer were added and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Thereafter, cells were incubated with streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase complex for 30 min at room temperature. The sites of peroxidase binding were detected with diaminobenzidine. The percentage of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells (labelling index, LI %) was counted at × 400 magnification. In the absence of Tdt, no unspecific staining was observed. For each slide, three randomly selected microscopic fields were observed and at least 100 cells per field were evaluated.

Caspase-3 activity assay

The extent of apoptosis was also measured by the caspase-3 activity assay as previously described(Reference Palozza, Serini and Torsello20). Briefly, after a 24 h treatment, cells (2 × 106) were lysed in 50 mm-2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-1,3-diol–HCl buffer (pH 7·5) containing 0·5 mm-EDTA, 0·5 % IGEPAL® Ca-630 and 150 mm-NaCl. Then the cell lysate was incubated with 50 μm-fluorogenic substrate, N-acetyl-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-(7-amino-4-methylcoumarine) (Ac-DEVD-AMC; Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA, USA), in a reaction buffer (10 mm-HEPES (pH 7·5) containing 50 mm-NaCl and 2·5 mm-dithiothreitol) for 120 min at 37°C. The release of AMC was measured with excitation at 380 nm and emission at 460 nm using a fluorescence spectrophotometer.

Western blot analysis

Cells (10 × 106) were harvested, washed once with ice-cold PBS and gently lysed for 30 min in ice-cold lysis buffer (1 mm-MgCl2, 350 mm-NaCl, 20 mm-HEPES, 0·5 mm-EDTA, 0·1 mm-ethylene glycol tetra-acetic acid, 1 mm-dithiothreitol, 1 mm-Na4P2O7, 1 mm-phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 mm-aprotinin, 1·5 mm-leupeptin, 1 mm-Na3VO4, 20 % glycerol, 1 % NP40). Cell lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C (10 000 g) and the supernatant fractions were used for Western Blot analysis. The anti-cyclin D1 (clone 72-13G; catalogue no. SC-450), anti-p21WAF-1/CIP-1 (clone F-5; catalogue no. 6246), anti-p27 (clone N-20; catalogue no. SC-527), anti-Bax (clone P-19; catalogue no. SC-526), anti-Bcl-xl S/l (clone L-19; catalogue no. SC-1041) and anti-p53 (clone DO-1; catalogue no. SC-126) monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The anti-Bcl-2 (clone: Bcl-2/100/D5) monoclonal antibody was purchased from YLEM (Rome, Italy). Blots were washed with PBS and exposed to horseradish peroxidase-labelled secondary antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) for 45 min at room temperature. Immunocomplexes were visualised by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL™ Western Blotting Analysis System; ECL, Amersham, Bucks, UK) and quantified by densitometric scanning.

β-Carotene extraction and assay

β-Carotene was extracted with 1 volume of methanol and 3 volumes of hexane–diethyl ether (1:1) from 10 × 106 cells after the different times of treatment and analysed by HPLC, as described previously(Reference Palozza, Calviello and Serini21).

Samples were dissolved in methanol and a 20 μl sample was analysed by reverse-phase HPLC with spectrophotometric detection on a Perkin-Elmer LC-295 detector at 450 nm. The column was packed with Alltech C18 Adsorbosphere HS material, 3 μm particle size, in a 15 × 0·46 cm cartridge format (Alltech Associates, Deerfield, IL, USA). A 1 cm cartridge precolumn, containing 5 μm C18 Adsorbosphere packing was used. Analyses were done by gradient elution; the initial mobile phase was 85 % acetonitrile–15 % methanol, with the addition of 30 % 2-propanol at 8 min. Ammonium acetate (HPLC grade, 0·01 %) was added to the initial mobile phase.

Statistical analysis

Three separate cultures per treatment were utilised for analysis in each experiment. Values are presented as mean values with their standard errors. One-way ANOVA was adopted to assess differences among the concentrations. When significant values were found (P < 0·05), post hoc comparisons of means were made using Fisher's test. Differences were analysed using Minitab Software (Minitab, Inc., State College, PA, USA). Multifactorial two-way ANOVA was adopted to assess any differences among the treatments and the times (Fig. 1(B), Fig. 6). When significant values were found (P < 0·05), post hoc comparisons of means were made using the honestly significant differences test.

Fig. 1 Effects of tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate on the growth of HT-29 cells. (A) Effects of different digestate concentrations for 24 h: (□), control; (■), digestate at 20 ml/l; (▧), digestate at 50 ml/l; (), digestate at 100 ml/l. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test). (B) Effects of different times (24, 48, 72 h) of treatment: (□), control; (), digestate at 100 ml/l. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·002; Tukey's test). The treatment–time interaction was significant (P < 0·05).

Results

The amount of β-carotene transferred to the aqueous fraction during the digestion procedure (8·7 (sem 0·8) μg/g fresh weight) was less than one tenth of the amount of β-carotene originally contained in the homogenate (140·0 (sem 14·5) μg/g fresh weight). Moreover, heat treatment of tomato homogenate before in vitro digestion induced, as demonstrated also in other studies(Reference Palozza, Calviello and Serini21), a three-fold increase in the carotenoid content, reaching the value of 22·0 (sem 0·3) μg/g fresh weight. This is in agreement with other findings according to which processing of vegetable foods before consumption enhances to a lesser or greater extent – depending on treatment and on carotenoid type – carotenoid release(Reference Willcox, Catignani and Lazarus22).

Fig. 1 shows the effects of tcly-b tomato digestate on the growth of HT-29 cells, as measured by direct cell counting. Fig. 1(A) shows the effects of varying digestate concentrations in cells treated for 24 h and Fig. 1(B) shows the effects of 100 ml/l digestate in cells treated for different periods of time. tcly-b Tomato digestate inhibited the growth of HT-29 cells in a dose-dependent manner. After 24 h of incubation, a cell growth inhibition of about 10, 25 and 55 % was observed following the addition of tcly-b tomato digestate to the culture medium at the concentrations of 20, 50 and 100 ml/l, respectively (Fig. 1(A)). A clear inhibition of cell growth was evidenced after 24 h of incubation following the addition of digestate at the concentration of 100 ml/l, which was not significantly modified prolonging the incubation time until 72 h (Fig. 1(B)). The effect seems to be specific for tumour cells, since differentiated Caco-2 cells(Reference Sambuy, De Angelis and Ranaldi23) were not affected in cell viability by tcly-b tomato digestate at the concentration of 100 ml/l for 24 h. Cell viability was 96 (sem 6) and 97 (sem 6) % in the absence and in the presence of digestate, respectively.

Since it has been previously reported that carotenoids act as strong apoptotic inducers in tumour cells, we examined whether the reduction in cell number was associated with apoptosis induction.

Apoptosis induction by tcly-b tomato digestate was studied by analysing the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells (Fig. 2(A)) and the activation of caspase-3, one of the most important cell death executioners for apoptosis (Fig. 2(B)). We found that a 24 h treatment with the digestate resulted in both an increase in the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells and in a strong dose-dependent increase in 7-amido-4-methylcoumarin fluorescence, indicative of the activation of caspase-3 in HT-29 cells.

Fig. 2 Effects of varying tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate concentration on apoptosis induction in HT-29 cells: (□), control; (■), digestate at 20 ml/l; (▧), digestate at 50 ml/l; (), digestate at 100 ml/l. (A) Percentage of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL)-positive cells. (B) Caspase-3 activation. Cells were treated for 24 h. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test).

Consistent with these results, analysis of the cell cycle revealed the appearance of a pre-G1 peak (subdiploid DNA content), which is characteristic of apoptotic cell death, in HT-29 cells treated with tcly-b tomato digestate for 24 h (Table 1). This value increased in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, treatment with tcly-b tomato digestate for 24 h resulted in a significant dose-dependent inhibition of cell cycle progression, showed by the accumulation of cells in both the G0/G1 and G2/M phase and by a concomitant decrease in the percentage of cells in the S phase.

Table 1 Effect of tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) tomato digestate on cell cycle distribution in HT-29 cells (%)

(Mean values of three different experiments with their standard errors)

Control, vehicle control-treated cells; T, tlcy-b tomato digestate-treated cells.

a,b,c Mean values within a column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fisher's test).

To explore the effects of tcly-b tomato digestate on apoptosis-regulating proteins, we examined the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, which are known to suppress programmed cell death, and that of Bax, which promotes it, in HT-29 cells treated for 24 h (Fig. 3). Treatment with tomato digestate significantly reduced the expression of both Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, no significant changes in the expression of Bax were found under the same conditions.

Fig. 3 Bax, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl expression in HT-29 cells treated with varying tomato lycopene β-cyclase(tcly-b) tomato digestate concentrations for 24 h: (□), control (C); (■), digestate at 20 ml/l (T20); (▧), digestate at 50 ml/l (T50); (), digestate at 100 ml/l (T100). (A) Representative Western blot analyses. (B) Bcl-2 densitometric analysis. (C) Bcl-xl densitometric analysis. Values are the means of three different determinations, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test).

Fig. 4 shows the effect of increasing β-carotene concentrations on cell growth (Fig. 4(A)), caspase-3 activation (Fig. 4(B)), and Bcl-2 (Fig. 4(C)) and Bcl-xl (Fig. 4(D)) content following a 24 h treatment. Carotenoid treatment inhibited cell growth and induced caspase-3 activation in a dose-dependent manner. Such effects were also accompanied by a decreased Bcl-2:actin and Bcl-xl:actin ratio.

Fig. 4 Effect of β-carotene on cell growth (A), caspase-3 activation (B), Bcl-2 (C) and Bcl-xl (D) content in HT-29 cells following a 24 h treatment. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test).

When the activity of tcly-b tomato digestate, containing in our experimental conditions β-carotene at the concentrations of 0·08, 0·16 and 0·8 μm corresponding to 20, 50 and 100 ml/l, respectively, was compared with that of purified β-carotene at concentrations ranging from 0·5 to 10 μm (Fig. 5), the growth-inhibitory effect of the digestate was remarkably higher than that of the purified β-carotene, as highlighted by the different percentage of cell growth inhibition.

Fig. 5 Comparison of β-carotene (●) and tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate (■) ability in inhibiting HT-29 cells growth after 24 h treatment. Concentrations of tcly-b tomato digestate of 20, 50 and 100 ml/l correspond to β-carotene concentrations of 0·08, 0·16 and 0·8 μm, respectively.

As shown in Fig. 6, HT-29 cells incorporated and/or associated β-carotene linearly. A time-dependent linear increase in β-carotene content was observed in cells treated for 24 h with both 100 ml/l digestate and purified β-carotene at the concentration of 0·8 μm, which corresponds to the digestate carotenoid amount. Purified β-carotene was incorporated and/or associated to a greater extent than β-carotene in the digestate. The cellular carotenoid amount increased in a dose-dependent manner after the addition of 20, 50 and 100 ml/l digestate, respectively, for 24 h (data not shown).

Fig. 6 β-Carotene incorporation and/or association in HT-29 cells treated with tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate (■) and purified β-carotene (●) for 24 h. The concentration of digestate in cultured medium was 100 ml/l and that of the purified carotenoid was 0·8 μm. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the digestate-treated cells (P < 0·005; Tukey's test).

Discussion

In the present study we investigated the growth-inhibitory effect of the β-carotene-rich tlcy-b tomato, obtained by the modulation of carotenogenesis in tomato fruits via genetic engineering(Reference D'Ambrosio, Giorio and Marino8), on human intestinal cancer cells cultured in vitro. Colon cancer is one of the most common causes of death in Western populations(Reference Parker, Tong and Bolden24); epidemiological and experimental data have shown that a high dietary intake of fruit and vegetables rich in carotenoids is associated with a lower risk of colon neoplasia(Reference Giovannucci, Stampfer and Colditz25Reference Slattery, Benson and Curtin27). Although some human intervention trials failed to demonstrate the prevention of colon cancer by β-carotene supplements(28Reference MacLennan, Macrae and Bain30), other interventions showed a significant protective effect of β-carotene(Reference Taylor, Li and Dawsey31), a reduced rate of colon cell proliferation in patients with adenomatous polyps(Reference Cahill, O'Sullivan and Mathias32) and protective effects against colon carcinogenesis in animal models(Reference Alabaster, Tang and Frost33, Reference Tanaka, Kawamori and Ohnishi34). More recently, growth-inhibitory effects by carotenoids in human colon cancer cell lines were also reported by our group(Reference Palozza, Maggiano and Calviello35, Reference Palozza, Calviello and Maggiano36).

The model system utilised in the present study consisted of HT-29 human adenocarcinoma colon cells treated with different amount of tlcy-b tomato subjected to an in vitro simulated digestion(Reference Garrett, Failla and Sarama17). During the in vitro digestion, thanks to the action of pancreatic enzymes and bile salts, at specific pH conditions, bioactive molecules are transferred from the food matrix to the aqueous micellar fraction, becoming available for cell uptake. In vitro simulated digestion has been proven to represent a very useful and efficient approach to deliver molecules to cells in culture, quite similar to the physiological process that takes place in vivo in the gastrointestinal tract. This method has been utilised for assessing bioaccessibility and bioavailability of Fe(Reference Etcheverry, Wallingford and Miller37), amino acids(Reference Cave38), carotenoids from baby food meals(Reference Garrett, Failla and Sarama17) and of other molecules. It has also been recently applied by us(Reference Palozza, Serini and Boninsegna14) to the study of the effects of tomato lycopene on the growth of colon cancer cells. We have shown that ripe tomato, containing essentially lycopene, is a anti-proliferative agent not only in prostate cancer cells(Reference Rao, Ray and Rao39), but also in colon cancer cells such as HT-29. In fact, tomato digestate inhibited cell cycle progression through the decrease of cyclin D1 expression and induced apoptosis through the modulation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl proteins. This effect seems to be specific for colon cancer cells since, as it has been reported in the Results section, differentiated Caco-2 cells, representing a suitable model of absorbing intestinal cells(Reference Sambuy, De Angelis and Ranaldi23), are not affected in their viability by digestate in the range of concentrations used in the present study. This observation is in agreement with previous findings, comparing the effects of β-carotene in normal and tumour cells(Reference Palozza40). In particular, in a previous study, we reported that β-carotene was much more potent in inhibiting the growth and altering the viability in undifferentiated than in dimethyl sulfoxide-differentiated HL-60 cells(Reference Palozza, Serini and Torsello41).

Lycopene and β-carotene exert a significant antioxidant activity, but their anti-proliferative action, tested in different cell types, has been attributed also to other specific molecular processes to which these molecules take part(Reference Bertram42). For instance, it has been demonstrated in prostate cancer cells that lycopene regulates the expression of specific proteins, such as connexin 43, involved in proper cell–cell communication and therefore in the control of cell proliferation(Reference Wertz, Siler and Goralczyk43). β-Carotene is the main precursor of vitamin A, a well-characterised morphogen that, once metabolised to retinoic acid, modulates the expression of hundreds of genes involved in embryogenesis, cell growth and differentiation(Reference Balmer and Blomhoff44).

We have investigated in the present study the mechanisms involved in the growth-inhibitory effects of molecules, mainly β-carotene, released from the tlcy-b tomato during the in vitro digestion treatment and probably presented to the cells in micelles(Reference Borel, Grolier and Armand45). Only a small amount of β-carotene, less than 10 %, is released during digestion; in agreement with the observation of other authors(Reference van Het Hof, West and Weststrate46), this amount increases more than three times when the tomato homogenate is subjected to heat treatment before digestion.

The mechanisms by which β-carotene inhibits the growth of colon cancer cells is still not completely understood. It was shown that apoptosis is involved, since this carotenoid interferes with cell cycle progression(Reference Palozza, Serini and Torsello20). In the present paper we have investigated and elucidated in HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells the effects of tlcy-b tomato digestate on individual steps of the cell cycle and some key proteins involved in this activity.

Since it has been previously reported(Reference Palozza, Serini and Torsello41) that carotenoids are strong apoptotic inducers in cancer cells, we investigated whether the inhibition of proliferation caused by digested tlcy-b tomato was associated with induction of apoptosis. By both methods utilised, TUNEL-positive cells and activation of caspase-3, it was demonstrated that tlcy-b tomato digestate indeed induced apoptosis. In parallel, the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, inhibitors of programmed cell death, was decreased. On the other hand, the pro-apoptotic protein Bax was not affected by carotenoid treatment. It is well known that the ratio of the anti-apoptotic:pro-aopotic Bcl-2 family proteins, more than the level of the individual proteins, is extremely important in modulating the apoptotic process(Reference Korsmeyer, Veis and Merry47). It has been demonstrated that β-carotene is able to decrease the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl in colon cancer cells(Reference Palozza, Serini and Torsello20, Reference Palozza, Serini and Di Nicuolo48) and to diminish that of Bcl-2 in HL-60 cells(Reference Palozza, Serini and Torsello41). Such effects were strictly related to apoptosis induction and to reactive oxygen species production by the carotenoid. This finding is particularly interesting in the light of the data supporting a role for Bcl-2 in an antioxidant pathway, whereby this protein prevents programmed cell death by decreasing the formation of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation products(Reference Kane, Sarafian and Anton49).

In addition, data from other studies suggest that carotenoids modulate pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, including Bad(Reference Liu, Lian and Smith50), Bid(Reference Hedren, Diaz and Svanberg19) and Bax(Reference Palozza, Serini and Di Nicuolo51) in different experimental models. In particular, it has been recently shown that the increase in Bax expression and in apoptosis induction caused by cigarette tar was prevented by the addition of β-carotene in Rat-1 fibroblasts as well as in different tumour cell lines(Reference Palozza, Serini and Di Nicuolo51). On the other hand, an increased expression of Bax protein by β-carotene has been recently reported in U-937 cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells by micro-array analysis(Reference Sacha, Zawada and Hartwich52, Reference Bodzioch, Dembinska-Kiec and Hartwich53).

Since apoptosis is the end point of some epithelial colonic cell differentiation pathways, a process that induces apoptosis should also reduce proliferative signals. In fact, the inhibition of growth and the increased expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl was associated with the slowdown of cell cycle progression at the G0/G1 and G2/M phase.

HT-29 cells accumulate β-carotene in a linear dose-dependent way (Fig. 6). It is crucial to remark that the growth-inhibitory action of tcly-b tomato digestate is active at a concentration much lower than that of purified β-carotene, although purified β-carotene was incorporated to a greater extent into the cells. Tomatoes contain several bioactive compounds, mainly lycopene but also other carotenoids such as β-carotene, phytoene, phytofluene, their metabolites and oxidative products, as well as vitamin E, vitamin C and polyphenols(Reference Canene-Adams, Campbell and Zaripheh16). tlcy-b Tomatoes are enginereed to be very rich in β-carotene; however, as underlined above, other molecules, including a very small amount of lycopene, are present that are probably released by digestion and that can contribute in cooperation with β-carotene to the effects described.

It is also important to stress that micellarisation is a more physiological method to solubilise and deliver molecules, in particular lipophylic molecules, compared with the use of a solvent. In conclusion, the results obtained with this method point out that the whole digested food, containing different bioactive molecules at different relative concentrations, their metabolites, some minor components and the matrix itself, provides a unique mixture with a specific function in maintaining or protecting health.

In conclusion, simulated digestion is confirmed as a valid method to perform in vitro nutritional studies. The next crucial effort will be the analysis of the complete pattern of molecules involved in the effect observed and their interaction.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture (MIPAF), ‘GMO in Agriculture’ and LYCOCARD, European Integrated Project no. 016213.

D. B. and P. P. performed most of the experiments and contributed equally to the discussion and to writing the manuscript; R. S. performed HPLC determinations; A. B. performed the cytofluorimetric assays; F. C. produced the tlcy-b tomato and provided the homogenates; G. M., as coordinator of the project ‘GMO in Agriculture’, participated in the research planning and discussion of results; S. G. coordinated the research and contributed to the planning, realisation and discussion of the work.

P. P. and D. B. contributed equally to the present study.

There is no conflict of interest that should be disclosed.

References

1Nau, H & Blaner, WS (1999) Retinoids: The Biochemical and Molecular Basis of Vitamin A and Retinoid. Action with Contributions by Numerous Experts. Handbook of Experiments Pharmacology, vol. 139 [H Nau and WS Blaner, editors]New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Blomhoff, R & Blomhoff, HK (2006) Overview of retinoid metabolism and function. J Neurobiol 66, 606630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Sporn, MB, Roberts, AB & Goodman, DS (1994) The Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry and Medicine, 2nd ed.New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
4West, KP Jr (2002) Extent of vitamin A deficiency among preschool children and women of reproductive age. J Nutr 132, 2857S2866S.Google Scholar
5Ye, X, Al-Babili, S, Kloti, A, et al. (2000) Engineering the provitamin A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science 287, 303305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Diretto, G, Al-Babili, S, Tavazza, R, et al. (2007) Metabolic engineering of potato carotenoid content through tuber-specific overexpression of a bacterial mini-pathway. PLoS ONE 2, e350.Google Scholar
7Paine, JA, Shipton, CA, Chaggar, S, et al. (2005) Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotechnol 23, 482487.Google Scholar
8D'Ambrosio, C, Giorio, G, Marino, I, et al. (2004) Virtually complete conversion of lycopene into β-carotene in fruits of tomato plants transformed with the tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) cDNA. Plant Sci 166, 207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Krinsky, NI & Johnson, EJ (2005) Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease. Mol Aspects Med 26, 459516.Google Scholar
10Stahl, W & Sies, H (2005) Bioactivity and protective effects of natural carotenoids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1740, 101107.Google Scholar
11Bendich, A & Olson, JA (1989) Biological actions of carotenoids. FASEB J 3, 19271932.Google Scholar
12Giovannucci, E (1999) Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 317331.Google Scholar
13Ranaldi, G, Bellovino, D, Palozza, P, et al. (2007) Beneficial or detrimental effects of carotenoids contained in food: cell culture models. Mini Rev Med Chem 7, 11201128.Google Scholar
14Palozza, P, Serini, S, Boninsegna, A, et al. (2007) The growth-inhibitory effects of tomatoes digested in vitro in colon adenocarcinoma cells occur through down regulation of cyclin D1, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Br J Nutr 98, 789795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Campbell, JK, Canene-Adams, K, Lindshield, BL, et al. (2004) Tomato phytochemicals and prostate cancer risk. J Nutr 134, 3486S3492S.Google Scholar
16Canene-Adams, K, Campbell, JK, Zaripheh, S, et al. (2005) The tomato as a functional food. J Nutr 135, 12261230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Garrett, DA, Failla, ML & Sarama, RJ (1999) Development of an in vitro digestion method to assess carotenoid bioavailability from meals. J Agric Food Chem 47, 43014309.Google Scholar
18Jacobs, DR Jr & Tapsell, LC (2007) Food, not nutrients, is the fundamental unit in nutrition. Nutr Rev 65, 439450.Google Scholar
19Hedren, E, Diaz, V & Svanberg, U (2002) Estimation of carotenoid accessibility from carrots determined by an in vitro digestion method. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 425430.Google Scholar
20Palozza, P, Serini, S, Torsello, A, et al. (2003) Mechanism of activation of caspase cascade during β-carotene-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells. Nutr Cancer 47, 7687.Google Scholar
21Palozza, P, Calviello, G, Serini, S, et al. (2001) β-Carotene at high concentrations induces apoptosis by enhancing oxy-radical production in human adenocarcinoma cells. Free Radic Biol Med 30, 10001007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Willcox, JK, Catignani, GL & Lazarus, S (2003) Tomatoes and cardiovascular health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43, 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Sambuy, Y, De Angelis, I, Ranaldi, G, et al. (2005) The Caco-2 cell line as a model of the intestinal barrier: influence of cell and culture-related factors on Caco-2 cell functional characteristics. Cell Biol Toxicol 21, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Parker, SL, Tong, T, Bolden, S, et al. (1996) Cancer statistics, 1996. CA Cancer J Clin 46, 527.Google Scholar
25Giovannucci, E, Stampfer, MJ, Colditz, G, et al. (1992) Relationship of diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 84, 9198.Google Scholar
26Mayne, ST (1996) β-Carotene, carotenoids, and disease prevention in humans. FASEB J 10, 690701.Google Scholar
27Slattery, ML, Benson, J, Curtin, K, et al. (2000) Carotenoids and colon cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 575582.Google Scholar
28Anonymous (1994) The effect of vitamin E and β carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 330, 10291035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Greenberg, ER, Baron, JA, Tosteson, TD, et al. (1994) A clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent colorectal adenoma. Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 331, 141147.Google Scholar
30MacLennan, R, Macrae, F, Bain, C, et al. (1995) Randomized trial of intake of fat, fibre, and β carotene to prevent colorectal adenomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 87, 17601766.Google Scholar
31Taylor, PR, Li, B, Dawsey, SM, et al. (1994) Prevention of esophageal cancer: the nutrition intervention trials in Linxian, China. Linxian Nutrition Intervention Trials Study Group. Cancer Res 54, 2029s2031s.Google Scholar
32Cahill, RJ, O'Sullivan, KR, Mathias, PM, et al. (1993) Effects of vitamin antioxidant supplementation on cell kinetics of patients with adenomatous polyps. Gut 34, 963967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Alabaster, O, Tang, Z, Frost, A, et al. (1995) Effect of β-carotene and wheat bran fibre on colonic aberrant crypt and tumor formation in rats exposed to azoxymethane and high dietary fat. Carcinogenesis 16, 127132.Google Scholar
34Tanaka, T, Kawamori, T, Ohnishi, M, et al. (1995) Suppression of azoxymethane-induced rat colon carcinogenesis by dietary administration of naturally occurring xanthophylls astaxanthin and canthaxanthin during the postinitiation phase. Carcinogenesis 16, 29572963.Google Scholar
35Palozza, P, Maggiano, N, Calviello, G, et al. (1998) Canthaxanthin induces apoptosis in human cancer cell lines. Carcinogenesis 19, 373376.Google Scholar
36Palozza, P, Calviello, G, Maggiano, N, et al. (2000) β-Carotene antagonizes the effects of EPA on cell growth and lipid peroxidation in WiDr adenocarcinoma cells. Free Radic Biol Med 28, 228234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Etcheverry, P, Wallingford, JC, Miller, DD, et al. (2005) The effect of Ca salts, ascorbic acid and peptic pH on Ca, Zn and Fe bioavailabilities from fortified human milk using an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cell model. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 75, 171178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Cave, NA (1988) Bioavailability of amino acids in plant feedstuffs determined by in vitro digestion, chick growth assay, and true amino acid availability methods. Poult Sci 67, 7887.Google Scholar
39Rao, AV, Ray, MR & Rao, LF (2006) Lycopene. Adv Food Nutr Res 51, 99164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Palozza, P (2005) Can β-carotene regulate cell growth by a redox mechanism? An answer from cultured cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1740, 215221.Google Scholar
41Palozza, P, Serini, S, Torsello, A, et al. (2002) Regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis by β-carotene in undifferentiated and differentiated HL-60 leukemia cells: possible involvement of a redox mechanism. Int J Cancer 97, 593600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Bertram, JS (2004) Induction of connexin 43 by carotenoids: functional consequences. Arch Biochem Biophys 430, 120126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Wertz, K, Siler, U & Goralczyk, R (2004) Lycopene: modes of action to promote prostate health. Arch Biochem Biophys 430, 127134.Google Scholar
44Balmer, JE & Blomhoff, R (2002) Gene expression regulation by retinoic acid. J Lipid Res 43, 17731808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Borel, P, Grolier, P, Armand, M, et al. (1996) Carotenoids in biological emulsions: solubility, surface-to-core distribution, and release from lipid droplets. J Lipid Res 37, 250261.Google Scholar
46van Het Hof, KH, West, CE, Weststrate, JA, et al. (2000) Dietary factors that affect the bioavailability of carotenoids. J Nutr 130, 503506.Google Scholar
47Korsmeyer, SJ, Veis, DJ, Merry, DE, et al. (1993) Bcl-2/Bax: a rheostat that regulates an antioxidant pathway and cell death. Semin Cancer Biol 4, 327332.Google ScholarPubMed
48Palozza, P, Serini, S, Di Nicuolo, F, et al. (2004) Modulation of apoptotic signalling by carotenoids in cancer cells. Arch Biochem Biophys 430, 104109.Google Scholar
49Kane, DJ, Sarafian, TA, Anton, R, et al. (1993) Bcl-2 inhibition of neural death: decreased generation of reactive oxygen species. Science 262, 12741277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Liu, C, Lian, F, Smith, DE, et al. (2003) Lycopene supplementation inhibits lung squamous metaplasia and induces apoptosis via up-regulating insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 in cigarette smoke-exposed ferrets. Cancer Res 63, 31383144.Google Scholar
51Palozza, P, Serini, S, Di Nicuolo, F, et al. (2004) β-Carotene exacerbates DNA oxidative damage and modifies p53-related pathways of cell proliferation and apoptosis in cultured cells exposed to tobacco smoke condensate. Carcinogenesis 25, 13151325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Sacha, T, Zawada, M, Hartwich, J, et al. (2005) The effect of β-carotene and its derivatives on cytotoxicity, differentiation, proliferative potential and apoptosis on the three human acute leukemia cell lines: U-937, HL-60 and TF-1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1740, 206214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Bodzioch, M, Dembinska-Kiec, A, Hartwich, J, et al. (2005) The microarray expression analysis identifies BAX as a mediator of β-carotene effects on apoptosis. Nutr Cancer 51, 226235.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Effects of tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate on the growth of HT-29 cells. (A) Effects of different digestate concentrations for 24 h: (□), control; (■), digestate at 20 ml/l; (▧), digestate at 50 ml/l; (), digestate at 100 ml/l. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test). (B) Effects of different times (24, 48, 72 h) of treatment: (□), control; (), digestate at 100 ml/l. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·002; Tukey's test). The treatment–time interaction was significant (P < 0·05).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Effects of varying tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate concentration on apoptosis induction in HT-29 cells: (□), control; (■), digestate at 20 ml/l; (▧), digestate at 50 ml/l; (), digestate at 100 ml/l. (A) Percentage of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL)-positive cells. (B) Caspase-3 activation. Cells were treated for 24 h. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test).

Figure 2

Table 1 Effect of tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) tomato digestate on cell cycle distribution in HT-29 cells (%)(Mean values of three different experiments with their standard errors)

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Bax, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl expression in HT-29 cells treated with varying tomato lycopene β-cyclase(tcly-b) tomato digestate concentrations for 24 h: (□), control (C); (■), digestate at 20 ml/l (T20); (▧), digestate at 50 ml/l (T50); (), digestate at 100 ml/l (T100). (A) Representative Western blot analyses. (B) Bcl-2 densitometric analysis. (C) Bcl-xl densitometric analysis. Values are the means of three different determinations, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test).

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Effect of β-carotene on cell growth (A), caspase-3 activation (B), Bcl-2 (C) and Bcl-xl (D) content in HT-29 cells following a 24 h treatment. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; Fischer's test).

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Comparison of β-carotene (●) and tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate (■) ability in inhibiting HT-29 cells growth after 24 h treatment. Concentrations of tcly-b tomato digestate of 20, 50 and 100 ml/l correspond to β-carotene concentrations of 0·08, 0·16 and 0·8 μm, respectively.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 β-Carotene incorporation and/or association in HT-29 cells treated with tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tcly-b) tomato digestate (■) and purified β-carotene (●) for 24 h. The concentration of digestate in cultured medium was 100 ml/l and that of the purified carotenoid was 0·8 μm. Values are the means of three different experiments, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the digestate-treated cells (P < 0·005; Tukey's test).