Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:44:07.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunohistochemical detection of changes in growth hormone cells in rat pituitaries in protein deficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

Therese Drummond
Affiliation:
Instituto de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Pernarnbuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. An immunohistochemical method was used to study the effect of a low-protein diet on growth hormone (GH) cells in the pituitaries of developing rats. The deficient diet (80 g protein/kg) was administered during gestation and lactation, or during the time after weaning until 90 d of age, or during both periods.

2. GH-cell changes were much more striking in males than in females.

3. In males, GH-producing cells were usually reduced in size and number in all treatments. The effect was most intense when protein deprivation occurred throughout gestation and sucking, and continued until 90 d of age, but it was also evident in animals given the low protein diet only after weaning. Recuperation appeared to be almost complete when offspring of deprived dams were fed on a normal diet after weaning.

4. It is concluded that a low-protein diet reduces the amount of GH in the rat pituitary in a way similar to that with a protein-free diet.

Type
General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Adibi, S. A. & Drash, A. L. (1970). J. Lab. clin. Med. 76, 722.Google Scholar
Alvarez, L. C., Dimas, C. O., Castro, A., Rossman, L. G., Vanderlaan, E. F. & Vanderlaan, W. P. (1972). J. clin. Endocr. Metab. 34, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, B. L. (1969). J. Histochem. Cytochern. 18, 1.Google Scholar
Beas, F., Contreras, I., Maccioni, A. & Arenas, S. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 169.Google Scholar
Becker, J., Pimstone, B. L., Hansen, J. D. & Hendricks, S. (1971). J. Lab. clin. Med. 78, 865.Google Scholar
Chow, B. F. & Lee, C. J. (1964). J. Nutr. 82, 10.Google Scholar
de Moura-Campos, F. A. (1949). Problemas Brasileiros de Alirnentão p. 232. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Alimentação da Previdência Social.Google Scholar
Dubois, P. & Girod, C. (1968). C. r. Séaanc. Soc. Biol. 162, 2116.Google Scholar
Friedman, R. C. & Reichlin, S. (1965). Endocrinology 76, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, C. & Zahnd, G. R. (1971). Helv. paediat. Acta 26, 266.Google Scholar
Hadden, D. R. (1967). Lancet ii, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, D. A. & Colle, E. (1969). Am. J. Dis. Child. 117, 636.Google Scholar
Lunn, P. G., Whitehead, R. G., Hay, R. W. & Baker, B. A. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 29, 399.Google Scholar
Midgley, A. R., Niswender, G. D., Gay, V. L. & Reichert, L. E. (1971). Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 27, 235.Google Scholar
Milner, R. D. (1970). Archs Dis. Childh. 45, 276.Google Scholar
Nakane, P. K. & Pierce, G. B. jr (1967). J. Cell Biol. 33, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimstone, B. L., Barbezat, G., Hansen, J. D. L. & Murray, P. (1968). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 21, 482.Google Scholar
Pimstone, B. L., Wittmann, W., Hansen, J. D. L. & Murray, P. (1966). Lancet ii, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, B. S. & Stewart, R. J. C. (1967). J. Endocr. 38, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E. B. (1956). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 92, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srebnik, H. H. (1965). Anat. Rec. 151, 476.Google Scholar
Srebnik, H. H. & Nelson, M. M. (1962). Endocrinology 70, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srebnik, H. H., Nelson, M. M. & Simpson, M. E. (1959). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 101, 97.Google Scholar
Stephan, J. K., Chow, B., Frohman, L. A. & Chow, B. F. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejada, C. & Russfield, A. B. (1957). Archs Dis. Ckildh. 32, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkle, A. (1970). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 135, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnick, M. (1970). Am. J. Dis. Child. 120, 416.Google Scholar