Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:32:24.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of adjustment of a weight-height index (W/H2) for frame size on the prediction of body fatness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Maartje A. Rookus ,
Jan Burema ,
Paul Deurenberg  and
Wilhelmina A. M. Van Der Wiel-Wetzels
Maartje A. Rookus
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Jan Burema
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Paul Deurenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Wilhelmina A. M. Van Der Wiel-Wetzels
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The impact of frame-size categories in weight-height tables was studied by comparing the efficiency of the body-mass index (weight/height2 (W/H2)) and weight adjusted for body-height and a body-diameter, W/(H2Dp), in predicting body fatness.

2. Body-weight, body-height, six body-diameters and four skinfold thicknesses were measured in ninety-five men and seventy women, aged between 23 and 35 years. Percentage of body fat was calculated from skinfold thicknesses using regression equations according to Durnin & Womersley (1974).

3. The inclusion of a body-diameter increased the explained variation of body fatness from 57% to 62% (knee) and 63% (shoulder) in men and from 63% to 69% (knee) in women.

4. It can be concluded that in the present population the efficiency of the prediction of percentage of body fat was not improved markedly by the inclusion of a body-diameter in the body-mass index, thus giving no support for the inclusion of frame-size categories in weight-height tables.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 335 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Andres, R., Elahi, D. & Tobin, J. D. A. (1983). International Congress of ObesityNew York, Abstr. 228.Google Scholar
Baecke, J. A. H., Burema, J. & Deurenberg, P. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baecke, J. A. H., Burema, J., Frijters, J. E. R., Hautvast, J. G. A. J. & Van der Wiel-Wetzels, W. A. M. (1983). International Journal of Obesity 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
Behnke, A. R. (1959). Human Biology 31, 295–315.Google Scholar
Beunen, G., Malina, R. M., Ostyn, M., Renson, R., Simons, J. & Van Gerven, D. (1982). American Journal Of Physiological Anthropometry 59, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beunen, G., Malina, R. M., Ostyn, M., Renson, R., Simons, J. & Van Gerven, D. (1983). Human Biology 55, 599–615.Google Scholar
Bray, G. A. (1973). Obesity in Perspective. PHEW Publication no. NIH 75–708. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health.Google Scholar
Brožek, J. (1956). Science 124, 685.Google Scholar
De Wijn, J. F. & Zaat, J. C. A. (1968). Voeding 29, 208–224.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Rahaman, M. M. (1967). British Journal of Nutrition 21, 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 77–97.Google Scholar
Forbes, G. B. (1977). Journal of Pediatrics 91, 40–42.Google Scholar
Forsyth, H. L. & Sinning, W. E. (1973). Medicine and Science in Sports 5, 174–180.Google Scholar
Frisancho, A. R. & Flegel, P. N. (1982). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36, 697–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisancho, A. R. & Flegel, P. N. (1983). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 37, 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garn, S. M., Clark, D. C. & Guire, K. E. (1974). American Journal of Physiological Anthropometry 40, 447–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garn, S. M. & Hawthorne, V. M. (1984). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 39, 490–499.Google Scholar
Hechter, H. H. (1959). Human Biology 31, 235–243.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1940). Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katch, V. L. & Freedson, P. S. (1982). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36, 669–675.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H. W., van Buchem, F. S. P., Buzina, R., Djordjevic, B. S., Dontas, A. S., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M. J., Kimura, N., Lekos, D., Monti, M., Puddu, V. & Taylor, H. L. (1967). Acta Medica Scandinavica 460, Suppl., 289–303.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M. J., Kimura, N. & Taylor, H. L. (1972). Journal of Chronic Diseases 25, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, T. R. (1983). Journal of the American Medical Association 250, 506–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, F., Webster, C. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1983). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 42, 163A.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (1959). Statistical Bulletin 40, 1.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (1983). Statistical Bulletin 64, 3.Google Scholar
Olkin, I. & Siotani, M. (1976). In Essays in Probability and Statistics, pp. 235–251 [Ikeda, S, Hayakawa, T, Hudimoto, H, Okamoto, M, Siotani, M. and Yamamoto, S. editors].Tokyo: Shinko Tsusho Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Pollock, M. L., Hickmann, T., Kendrick, Z., Jackson, A., Linnerud, A. C. & Dawson, G. (1976). Journal of Applied Physiology 40, 300–304.Google Scholar
Pollock, M. L., Laughridge, E. E., Coleman, B., Linnerud, A. C. & Jackson, A. (1975). Journal of Applied Physiology 38, 745–749.Google Scholar
Royal College of Physicians (1983). Journal of the Royal College of Physicians, London 17.Google Scholar
Seltzer, C. C. & Mayer, J. (1965). Postgraduate Medicine 8, A101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, C. C., Stoudt, H. W., Bell, B. & Mayer, J. (1970). American Journal of Epidemiology 92, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Döbeln, W. (1959). Acta Medica Scandinavica 165, 37–41.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. S. & Lourie, J. A. (1969). Human Biology. A Guide to Field Methods. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Wilmore, J. H. & Behnke, A. R. (1968). Journal of Applied Physiology 25, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmore, J. H. & Behnke, A. R. (1969). Journal of Applied Physiology 27, 25–31.Google Scholar
Womersley, J. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 271–284.Google Scholar