Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:21:42.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of body tissues as sources of nutrients for milk synthesis in the cow, using 13C as a marker

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. F. Wilson ,
D. D. S. Mackenzie ,
I. M. Brookes  and
G. L. Lyon
G. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
I. M. Brookes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
G. L. Lyon
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, DSIR, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The proportions of carbon in individual milk constituents derived from feed and body tissues in dairy cows, were estimated by taking advantage of the natural variations which occur in the ratio, 13C:12C present in C3- and C4-plant species.

2. Four cows, which had previously grazed C3 plants (ryegrass (Lolium spp.) and white clover (Trifolium repens)), were accustomed to indoor feeding on a ration of C3-plant material (cut pastures and barley meal). The ration was then changed abruptly to one of C4-plant material (paspalum (Paspalum dilatatum) hay, maize silage and meal) for a period of 8 or 9 d in early and again in late lactation.

3. During early lactation it was estimated that 54% of the C in milk fat was derived from the body fat reserves of high genetic merit cows. Corresponding values for casein and lactose were 34 and 24% respectively, if it is assumed they were derived from body protein reserves. In contrast steam-volatile fatty acids in milk fat were almost entirely derived from dietary sources.

4. The proportional contribution of body-tissue C to individual milk constituents varied considerably between animals, possibly associated with genetic merit or the size of the body reserves available for mobilization.

5. In late lactation, when cows were close to energy and protein balance, contributions of body-tissue C to milk fat, casein and lactose ranged up to 19, 19 and 8% respectively.

6. Estimates of endogenous losses of C in faeces averaged 12 and 9% in early and late lactation respectively, and corresponding values for endogenous urinary C were 23 and 15%.

Information

Type
General Nutrition papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , November 1988 , pp. 605 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Costa, N. D., McIntosh, G. H. & Snoswell, A. M. (1976) Australian Journal of Biological Science 29, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNiro, M. J. & Epstein, S. (1978) Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flux, D. S., Mackenzie, D. D. S. & Wilson, G. F. (1984) Animal Production 38, 377–384.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications) Agriculture Handbook, No. 379. Washington, D.C.; Agricultural Research Service.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Davey, A. W. F. & Holmes, C. W. (1985) Animal Production 40, 379–388.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Brookes, I. M., Ngarmsak, S., Mitchell, K. D. & Davey, A. W. F. (1985) Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 13–16.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J., Ludlow, M. M., Troughton, J. H. & Blunt, C. G. (1979) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J., Ludlow, M. M., Troughton, J. H. & Blunt, C. G. (1981) Search 12, 85–87.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Ludlow, M. M. & Troughton, J. H. (1975) Nature 256, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. H. & Christie, W. W. (1981). In Lipid Metabolism in Ruminant Animals, pp. 227–277 [Christie, W. W., editor]. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, J. D. (1984) Journal of Dairy Science 67, 1090–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & MacLeod, N. A. (1982) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 76A.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. & McDonald, I. (1981) British Journal of Nutrition 45, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, P. G. & Holland, R. (1977) Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rounick, J. S., Winterbourn, M. J. & Lyon, G. L. (1982) Oikos 39, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, E. W. (1982). In Protein Requirements for Cattle: Proceedings of an International Symposium at Oklahoma State University, November 1980, pp. 183–197 [Owens, I. M., editor]. Stillwater, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Swick, R. W. & Benevenga, N. J. (1977) Journal of Dairy Science 60, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieszen, L. L., Boutton, T. W., Tesdahl, K. G. & Slade, N. A. (1983) Oecologia (Berlin) 57, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Merwe, N. J. (1982) American Scientist 70, 596–606.Google Scholar
Waghorn, G. C. & Baldwin, R. L. (1984) Journal of Dairy Science 67, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar