Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T23:26:07.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iron availability from peas (Pisum sativurn) and bread containing added pea testa in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait  and
A. J. A. Wright
Susan J. Fairweather-Tait
Affiliation:
AFRC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA
A. J. A. Wright
Affiliation:
AFRC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Iron retention in adult male rats given 3 g dried ground peas, immature and mature (Pisum sarivum cv Dark-skin perfection) and leafless (Pisum sativum cv Filby), extrinsically labelled with 0.25 μCi 58Fe, was measured by whole-body counting. The Fe was less well absorbed (P < 0.01) from the mature peas (0.251 (SE 0.021)) than from the immature (0.384 (SE 0, 032)) or leafless peas (0.344 (SE 0.026)).

2. The availability of Fe from the leafless peas was compared with that of defatted soya-bean flour by the same technique. Significantly more Fe (P < 0.005) was retained from the pea flour (0.471 (SE 0.013)) than from the soya-bean flour (0.377 (SE 0.022)).

3. The effect of adding pea testa to bread (97.6 g/kg dry weight), as in the production of high-fibre white bread, on Fe availability was measured and compared with the availability of ferrous sulphate in young and adult male rats. There were no significant differences between the high-fibre and low-fibre breads in either age-group, although the older rats absorbed less Fe from all three sources. Retention from high-fibre bread, low-fibre bread and FeSO4 was as follows (mean with SE): young rats 0.452 (0.037), 0.475 (0.040) 0.541 (0.032); mature rats 0.363 (0.034), 0.366 (0.030), 0.471 (0.028).

4. It was concluded that the addition of pea testa to white bread does not have a detrimental effect on Fe availability. Immature and leafless peas appear to be a better source of available Fe than soya-bean flour, despite similar fibre levels, but with maturity the Fe in peas is rendered less available.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 193 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Ashworth, A., Milner, P. F. & Waterlow, J. C. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 29, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1980). Methods of Analysis 13, 39.Google Scholar
Björn- Rasmussen, E., Hallberg, L. & Walker, R. B. (1973). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 26, 1311–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. D., Morck, T. A. & Lynch, S. R. (1981). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 2622–2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1979). Eating for Health. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Deshpande, S. S., Sathe, S. K., Salunkhe, D. K. & Cornforth, D. P. (1982). Journal of Food Science 47, 1846–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disler, P. B., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Torrance, J. D., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, P. B. & Mayet, F. (1975). Gut 16, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englyst, H., Wiggins, H. S. & Cummings, J. H. (1982). Analyst, London 107, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairweather-Tait, S. J. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairweather-Tait, S. J. & Wright, A. J. A. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, R. M., Parker, H., Kondo, H. & Erdman, J. W. (1983). Nutrition Research 3, 699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Lopez, S. & Wyatt, C. J. (1982). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 30, 724–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillooly, M., Bothwell, T. H., Charlton, R. W., Torrance, J. D., Bezwoda, W. R., MacPhail, A. P., Derman, D. P., Novelli, L., Morrall, P. & Mayet, F. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. (1982). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 847–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A., Edgecombe, C. N. & Widdowson, E. M. (1943). Lancet ii, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, B. S. N. & Prabhavathi, T. (1982). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruliffson, W. S. & Hopping, J. M. (1963). American Journal of Physiology 204, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schricker, B. R., Miller, D. D. & Van Campen, D. (1982). Journal of Nutrition 112, 1696–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1973). Statistical Methods; 6th ed., p. 599. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Steinke, F. H. & Hopkins, D. T. (1978). Journal of Nutrition 108, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangkongchitr, V., Seib, P. A. & Hoseney, R. C. (1981). Cereal Chemistry 58, 226–228.Google Scholar
Young, V. R. & Janghorbani, M. (1982). Journal of Plant Foods 4, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar