Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:05:59.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A longitudinal study of maternal anthropometric changes in normal weight, overweight and obese women during pregnancy and postpartum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Hora Soltani  and
Robert B. Fraser
Hora Soltani*
Affiliation:
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinical Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
Robert B. Fraser
Affiliation:
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinical Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Hora Soltani, fax +44 (0)114 222 9856, email h.soltani@sheffield.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many women associate one or more of their pregnancies with the development of adult obesity. Such an association has not been fully explored. This longitudinal study examines the changes in maternal anthropometric indices during pregnancy and postpartum. Seventy-seven pregnant subjects were investigated longitudinally at about 13, 25 and 36 weeks gestation, of whom forty-seven continued taking part into the postpartum period. Maternal weight, height and skinfold thickness (triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac and mid thigh) were measured at each visit. Maternal fat mass was estimated from the conversion of the first four skinfold thicknesses. Maternal waist and hip circumferences were also measured at the first visit and 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Weight and fat gain during pregnancy (13–36 weeks gestation) was 10·9 (SD 4·7) KG AND 4·6 (sd 3·3) kg (P < 0·001) respectively. A significant increase in fat mass from 13 weeks gestation to 6-months postpartum was observed (2·6 (sd 4·5), P < 0·001). The increased weight at 6-months postpartum, however, was not statistically significant (1·1 (sd 6·0) kg, P = 0·20). Based on BMI in early pregnancy, the subjects were divided into groups of underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese. The last three groups were compared using ANOVA. The obese group showed a significant difference in the pattern of changes in the skinfold thickness, waist: hip ratio and fat mass at the postpartum period, in comparison with the other two groups. In conclusion, there is a tendency in the obese group to develop central obesity at the postpartum period.

Keywords

Maternal anthropometryObesityPregnancy
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , July 2000 , pp. 95 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2000

References

Department of Health (1997) Health of the Nation. A Progress Report. Public Accounts Committee 17th Report. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Durnin, JVGA (1987) Energy requirements of pregnancy: an integration of longitudinal data from the five-country study. Lancet ii, 1131–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, JVGA and Womersley, J (1974) Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsum, E, Sadurskis, A and Wager, J (1988) Resting metabolic rate and body composition of healthy Swedish women during pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 942–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, HE and Ellison, GT (1997) Do the changes in energy balance that occur during pregnancy predispose parous women to obesity?. Nutrition Research Reviews 10, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, HE, Ellison, GTH, Holliday, M and Lucassan, E (1997) The impact of pregnancy on the long term weight gain of primiparous women in England. International Journal of Obesity 21, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine (1990) Nutrition During Pregnancy: Weight Gain and Nutrient Supplement. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Jung, RT (1997) Obesity as a disease. British Medical Bulletin 53, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kissebah, AH and Krakower, GR (1994) Regional adiposity and morbidity. Physiological Reviews 74, 761–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederman, SA, Pierson, RN, Wang, J, Paxton, A, Thornton, J, Wendel, J and Heymsfield, SB (1993) Body composition measurements during pregnancy. Basic Life Science 60, 193–195.Google ScholarPubMed
McKeigue, PM, Pierpoint, T, Ferrie, JE and Marmot, MG (1992) Relationship of glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinaemia to body fat patterns in south Asians and Europeans. Diabetologia 35, 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J, Altman, DG, Campbell, MJ and Royston, P (1990) Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. British Medical Journal 300, 230–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muscati, SK, Graydonald, K and Koski, KG (1996) Timing of weight gain during pregnancy, promoting fetal growth and minimizing maternal weight retention. International Journal of Obesity Related Metabolic Disorders 20, 526–532.Google ScholarPubMed
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1991), Census of Great Britain 2, 40–41.Google Scholar
Ohlin, A and Rossner, S (1990) Maternal body weight development after pregnancy. International Journal of Obesity 14, 159–173.Google Scholar
Sadurskis, A, Kabob, N, Wager, J and Forsum, E (1988) Energy metabolism, body composition, and milk production in healthy Swedish women during lactation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siri, WE (1956) The gross composition of the body. In Advances in Biological and Medical Physics, pp. 239–280 [Tobias, CA and Lawrence, JH, editors]. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sohlström, A and Forsum, E (1995) Changes in adipose tissue volume and distribution during reproduction in Swedish women as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohlström, AW, haled, L & Forsum, E (1993) Total body fat and its distribution during human reproduction as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. In Human Body Composition, pp. 181–184 [Ellis, KJ and Eastman, JD, editors]. New York, NY: Polonium Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, CG, Willett, WC, Carey, VJ, Rich-Edwards, J, Hunter, DJ, Colditz, GA, Stampfer, MJ, Speizer, FE, Spiegelman, D and Manson, JE (1997) A prospective study of pregravid determinants of gestational diabetes mellitus. Journal of the American Medical Association 278, 1078–1083.Google Scholar
Taggart, NR, Holliday, RM, Billewicz, WZ, Hytten, FE and Thompson, AM (1967) Changes in skinfolds during pregnancy. British Journal of Nutrition 21, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Raaij, JMA, Peek, MEM, Vermaat-Miedema, SH, Schnock, CM and Hautvast, JGAJ (1988) New equations for estimating body fat mass in pregnancy for body density or total body water. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Raaij, JMA, Schnock, CM, Vermaat-Miedema, SH, Peek, MEM and Hautvast, JGAJ (1989) Body fat mass and basal metabolic rate in Dutch women before, during and after pregnancy: a reappraisal of energy cost of pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 49, 765–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1987) Report on a WHO Consultation on the Epidemiology of Obesity: Measuring Obesity-classification and Description of Anthropometric Data. Copenhagen and Warsaw: WHO.Google Scholar