Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T08:28:15.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of fat thickness in man: a comparison of ultrasound, Harpenden calipers and electrical conductivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. A. D Booth ,
B. A. Goddard  and
A. Paton
R. A. D Booth
Affiliation:
Physics Laboratory, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham 18
B. A. Goddard
Affiliation:
Physics Laboratory, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham 18
A. Paton
Affiliation:
Physics Laboratory, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham 18
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Subcutaneous fat thickness has been measured by three different techniques in forty-one subjects. 2. Ultrasound provided the most accurate measurement in experienced hands. 3. A method based on electrical conductivity was also accurate but was unpleasant for the subject. 4. Harpenden calipers were the least satisfactory of the three techniques tested.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 719 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

Bauereisen, E. & Paerisch, M. (1953). Z. ges. exp. Med. 120, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. A. W., Hammond, W. H., Healey, M. J. R., Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, R. F. (1962). Clin. Sci. 22, 333.Google Scholar
Goldman, D. E. & Hueter, T. F. (1956). J. acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, D. A., Hope, A., Turnbull, A. L. & Verel, D. (1956). Clin. Sci. 15, 557.Google Scholar
Stouffer, J. R., Wallentine, M. V., Wellington, G. H. & Diekmann, A. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar