Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:00:26.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meta-analysis of the health effects of using the glycaemic index in meal-planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Maretha Opperman ,
Christina S. Venter ,
Welma Oosthuizen ,
Rachel L. Thompson  and
Hester H. Vorster
A. Maretha Opperman*
Affiliation:
School for Physiology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Christina S. Venter
Affiliation:
School for Physiology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Welma Oosthuizen
Affiliation:
School for Physiology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Rachel L. Thompson
Affiliation:
Public Health Nutrition, Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, UK
Hester H. Vorster
Affiliation:
School for Physiology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
*
*Corresponding author: fax + 27 18 299 2464, Email vgeamo@puknet.puk.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Diabetes mellitus and CVD are some of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Accumulating data indicate that a diet characterised by low-glycaemic index (GI) foods may improve the management of diabetes or lipid profiles. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to critically analyse the scientific evidence that low-GI diets have beneficial effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism compared with high-GI diets. We searched for randomised controlled trials with a crossover or parallel design published in English between 1981 and 2003, investigating the effect of low-GI v. high-GI diets on markers for carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Unstandardised differences in mean values were examined using the random effects model. The main outcomes were fructosamine, glycated Hb (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol and triacylglycerol. Literature searches identified sixteen studies that met the strict inclusion criteria. Low-GI diets significantly reduced fructosamine by –0·1 (95 % CI –0·20, 0·00) mmol/l (P=0·05), HbA1c by 0·27 (95 % CI –0·5, –0·03) % (P=0·03), total cholesterol by –0·33 (95 % CI –0·47, –0·18) mmol/l (P>0·0001) and tended to reduce LDL-cholesterol in type 2 diabetic subjects by –0·15 (95 % CI –0·31, –0·00) mmol/l (P=0·06) compared with high-GI diets. No changes were observed in HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations. No substantial heterogeneity was detected, suggesting that the effects of low-GI diets in these studies were uniform. Results of the present meta-analysis support the use of the GI as a scientifically based tool to enable selection of carbohydrate-containing foods to reduce total cholesterol and to improve overall metabolic control of diabetes.

Keywords

Glycaemic indexFructosamineGlycated haemoglobinHigh-density lipoprotein-cholesterolLow-density lipoprotein-cholesterolTotal cholesterolTriacylglycerol
Type
Review article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 367 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Adult Treatment Panel III Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. J Am Med Assoc (2001) 285, 2486–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Diabetes Association Nutrition recommendations and principles for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care (2001) 24, S44–S47.Google Scholar
American Dietetic Association Medical nutrition therapy and pharmacotherapy – position of the ADA. J Am Diet Assoc (1999) 99, 227–230.Google Scholar
Augustin, LS, Franceschi, S, Jenkins, DJAKendall, CWC, La Vecchia, CGlycemic index and chronic disease: a review. Eur J Clin Nutr (2002) 56, 1049–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balkau, B, Shipley, M, Jarret, RJPyorala, K, Forhan, A, Eschwege, EHigh blood glucose concentration is a risk factor for mortality in middle-aged nondiabetic men. 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study. Diabetes Care (1998) 21, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barakat, HA, Vadlamudi, S, Maclean, PMacdonald, K, Pories, WJLipoprotein metabolism in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Nutr Biochem (1996) 7, 586–598.Google Scholar
Bouche, C, Rizkalla, SW, Luo, JVidal, H, Veronese, A, Pacher, N, Fouquet, C, Lang, V, Slama, GFive week, low-glycemic index diets decreases total fat mass and improves plasma lipid profile in moderately overweight nondiabetic men. Diabetes Care (2002) 25, 822–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, JC, Colagiuri, S, Crossman, SAllen, A, Roberts, DCK, Truswell, ASLow-glycemic index foods improve long-term glycemic control in NIDDM. Diabetes Care (1991) 14, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand-Miller, J, Hayne, S, Petocz, PColagiuri, SLow-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care (2003) 26, 2261–2267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand-Miller, J, Nantel, G, Slama, G, Lang, VGlycemic index and health:the quality of the evidence ParisJohn Libbey Eurotext (2001)Google Scholar
Brand-Miller, JC, Holt, SHA, Pawlak, DBMcMillan, JGlycaemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr (2002) 76, 281S–285SSuppl.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand-Miller, JCImportance of glycemic index in diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr (1994) 59, 747S–752SSuppl.Google Scholar
Brussaard, JH, Katan, MB, Groot, PHEHavekes, LM, Hautvast, JGAJSerum lipoproteins of healthy persons fed a low-fat diet or a polyunsaturated fat diet for three months. Atherosclerosis (1982) 42, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brynes, AE, Edwards, CM, Ghatei, MADornhorst, A, Morgan, LM, Bloom, SR & Frost, GRA randomised four-intervention crossover study investigating the effect of carbohydrates on daytime profiles of insulin, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids and triacylglycerols in middle-aged men. Br J Nutr (2003) 89, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buyken, AE, Toeller, M, Heitkamp, GKaramaros, B, Rottiers, R, Muggeo, M & Fuller, JGlycemic index in the diet of European outpatients with type 1 diabetes: relations to glycated hemoglobin and serum lipids. Am J Clin Nutr (2001) 73, 574–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calle-Pascual, A, Gomez, V, Leon, EBordiu, EFoods with a low glycemic index do not improve glycemic control of both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients after one month of therapy. Diabete Metab (1988) 14, 629–633Google Scholar
Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines for the nutritional management of diabetes mellitus in the new millennium. A position statement by the Canadian Diabetes Association. Can J Diabetes Care (2000) 23, 56–69.Google Scholar
Castro Cabezas, M, Halkes, CJM, Meijssen, SVan Oostrom, AJHHM, Erkelens, DWDiurnal triglyceride profiles: a novel approach to study triglyceride changes. Atherosclerosis (2001) 155, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, M & Oxman, AD (2001) Analysing and presenting the results. In. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.1.4 (updated October 2001), section 8, pp. 59–78. The Cochrane Library, Oxford: Update Software.Google Scholar
Collier, G, Giudici, S, Kalmusky, JWolever, T, Helman, G, Wesson, V, Ehrlich, R, Jenkins, DLow glycaemic index starchy foods improve glucose control and lower serum cholesterol in diabetic children. Diabetes Nutr Metab (1988) 1, 11–19.Google Scholar
Coulston, AM & Reaven, GMMuch ado about (almost) nothing. Diabetes Care (1997) 20, 241–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutinho, M, Gerstein, HC, Wang, YYusuf, SFoods with a low glycemic index do not improve glycemic control of both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients after one month of therapy. Diabete Metab (1999) 22, 233–240Google Scholar
Defronzo, RA, Bonadonna, RC, Ferrannini, ELow-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care (1992) 13, 610–630.Google Scholar
Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Recommendations for the nutritional management of patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Nutr (2000) 54, 353–355.Google Scholar
Diabetes, UK (2003) Diabetes in Practice. New Nutritional Guidelines http://www.diabetes.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Dietitians Association of Australia Glycaemic index in diabetes management. Aust J Nutr Diet (1997) 54, 57–63.Google Scholar
Follmann, D, Elliott, P, Suh, ICutler, JVariance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. J Clin Epidemiol (1992) 45, 769–773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontvielle, A, Acosta, M, Rizkalla, SBornet, F, David, P, Letanoux, M, Tchobroutsky, G, Slama, GA moderate switch from high to low glycaemic-index foods for 3 weeks improves the metabolic control of type I (IDDM) diabetic subjects. Diabetes Nutr Metab (1988) 1, 139–143.Google Scholar
Fontvielle, A, Rizkalla, S, Penfornis, AAcosta, M, Bornet, F, Slama, GThe use of low glycaemic index foods improves metabolic control of diabetic patients over five weeks. Diabetic Med (1992) 9, 444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization/World Health Organization (1997) Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition – A Summary of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w8079e/w8079e00.htmGoogle Scholar
Ford, ES & Liu, SGlycemic index and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration among US adults. Arch Intern Med (2001) 161, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, G, Keogh, B, Smith, BSmith, D, Akinsanya, K, Leeds, AGlycemic index in the diet of European outpatients with type 1 diabetes: relations to glycated hemoglobin and serum lipids. Am J Clin Nutr (1996) 46, 669–672.Google Scholar
Frost, G, Leeds, A, Trew, GMargara, R, Dornhorst, AInsulin sensitivity in women at risk of coronary heart disease and the effect of a low glycemic diet. Metabolism (1998) 47, 1245–1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, G, Leeds, AA, Dore, CJMadeiros, S, Brading, S, Dornhorst, AGlycaemic index as determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration. Lancet (1999) 353, 1029–1030.Google Scholar
Frost, G, Wilding, J, Beecham, JDietary advice based on the glycaemic index improves dietary profile and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med (1994) 11, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garg, AInsulin resistance in the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care (1996) 19, 387–389.Google Scholar
Gilbertson, H, Brand-Miller, J, Thorburn, AEvans, S, Chondros, P, Werhter, GThe effect of flexible low glycemic index dietary advice versus measured carbohydrate exchange diets on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2001) 24, 1137–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbertson, H, Thorburn, A, Brand-Miller, JChandros, P, Werhter, GEffect of low-glycemic-index dietary advice on dietary quality and food choice in children with type 1 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr (2003) 77, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granberry, MC & Fonseca, VAInsulin resistance syndrome: options for treatment. South Med J (1999) 92, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilbronn, L, Noakes, M, Clifton, PThe effect of high- and low-glycemic index energy restricted diets on plasma lipid and glucose profiles in type 2 diabetic subjects with varying glycemic control. J Am Coll Nutr (2002) 21, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, PT, Thompson, SG, Deeks, JJAltman, DGMeasuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J (2003) 327, 557–560CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, SH, Brand-Miller, JC, Petocz, PAn insulin index of common foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000 kJ portions of common foods. Am J Clin Nutr (1997) 66, 1264–1276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvi, A, Karlstrom, B, Granfelt, YBjork, I, Asp, N, Vessby, BImproved glycaemic control and lipid profile and normalized fibrinolytic activity on a low-glycaemic index diet in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care (1999) 22, 10–18.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D, Wolever, T, Buckley, GLow-glycemic-index starchy foods in the diabetic diet. Am J Clin Nutr (1988) 48, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, DWolever, T, Collier, G, Ocana, A, Venketeshwer, A, Buckley, G, Lam, Y, Mayer, A, Thompson, LMetabolic effects of a low-glycemic-index diet. Am J Clin Nutr (1987 a) 46, 968–975.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D, Wolever, T, Kalmusky, HLow glycemic index carbohydrate foods in the management of hyperlipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr (1985) 42, 604–617.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D, Wolever, T, Kalmusky, HLow-glycemic index diet in hyperlipidemia: use of traditional starchy foods. Am J Clin Nutr (1987 b) 46, 66–71.Google Scholar
Jenkins, DJWolever, TM, Taylor, RH, Barker, H, Fielden, H, Baldwin, JM, Bowling, AC, Newman, HC, Jenkins, AL, Goff, DVGlycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr (1981) 34, 362–366.Google Scholar
Jenkins, DJA, Wolever, TMS, Jenkins, ALJosse, RG, Wong, GSThe glycaemic response to carbohydrate foods. Lancet (1984) 2, 388–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, IROwens, DR, Williams, S, Ryder, RE, Birtwell, AJ, Jones, MK, Gicheru, K, Hayes, TMGlycosylated serum albumin: an intermediate index of diabetic control. Diabetes Care (1983) 6, 501–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabir, MOppert, J-M, Vidal, H, Bruzzo, F, Fiquet, C, Wursch, P, Slama, G, Rizkalla, SFour-week low-glycemic index breakfast with a modest amount of soluble fibres in type 2 diabetic men. Metabolism (2002) 51, 81–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, CRInsulin action, diabetogenes, and the cause of type II diabetes. Diabetes (1994) 43, 1066–1084.Google Scholar
King, H, Aubert, RE, Herman, WHGlobal burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care (1998) 21, 1414–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kratz, A & Lewandrowski, KBNormal reference laboratory values. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. N Engl J Med (1998) 339, 1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, RM, Eckel, RH, Howard, BAHA dietary guidelines: revision: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation (2000) 102, 2284–2299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, P, Clark, MClinical Medicine LondonW.B.Saunders (1998)Google Scholar
Lafrance, L, Rahasa-Lohret, R, Poisson, DDucros, F, Chiasson, J-LEffects of different glycaemic index foods and dietary fibre intake on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetic patients on intensive insulin therapy. Diabet Med (1998) 15, 972–978.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, CC, Carter, AW, Mangum, SGreene, D, Richardson, A, Brown, SA prospective, randomized, multi-centered controlled trial to compare the annual outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus monitored with weekly fructosamine testing versus usual care: a 3-month interim analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther (2002) 4, 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, SIntake of refined carbohydrates and whole grain foods in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Nutr (2002) 21, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, DSThe glycemic index. Physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Am Med Assoc (2002) 287, 2414–2423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, DS, Eckel, RH, Howard, BThe glycemic index at 20 y. Am J Clin Nutr (2002) 76, 264S–265S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscombe, N, Noakes, M, Clifton, PDiets high and low in glycemic index versus high monounsaturated fat diets: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in NIDDM. Eur J Clin Nutr (1999) 53, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazir, DJ, Roberts, RS, Hill, SAMcQueen, MJMonthly intra-individual variation in lipids over a 1-year period in 22 normal subjects. Clin Biochem (1999) 5, 381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizkalla, SW, Bellisle, F, Slama, GHealth benefits of low glycaemic index foods, such as pulses, in diabetic patients and healthy individuals. Br J Nutr (2002) 88, S255–S262.Google Scholar
Salmeron, JManson, J, Stampfer, M, Colditz, G, Wing, A, Willet, WDietary fibre, glycemic load and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. J Am Med Assoc (1997 a) 277, 472–477.Google Scholar
Salmeron, JManson, JE, Stampfer, MJ, Colditz, GA, Wing, AL, Willet, WCDietary fibre, glycemic load and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care (1997 b) 20, 545–550.Google Scholar
Seidell, JCObesity, insulin resistance and diabetes – a worldwide epidemic. Br J Nutr (2000) 83, 5–8.Google Scholar
Singer, DE, Nathan, DM, Anderson, KMWilson, PW, Evans, JCAssociation of HbA 1c with prevalent cardiovascular disease in the original cohort of the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes (1992) 41, 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, IMAdler, AI, Andrew, H, Neil, W, Matthews, DR, Manley, SE, Cull, CA, Hadden, D, Turner, RC, Holman, RRAssociation of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Br Med J (2000) 321, 405–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timar, O, Sestier, F, Levy, EMetabolic syndrome X: a review. Can J Cardiol (2000) 16, 779–789.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsihlias, EB, Gibbs, AL, McBurney, IWolever, TComparison of high- and low-glycemic-index breakfast cereals with monounsaturated fat in the long-term dietary management of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr (2000) 72, 439–449Google Scholar
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet (1998) 352, 837–853.Google Scholar
Van Dam, RM, Visscher, AWJ, Feskens, EJMVerhoef, P, Kromhout, DDietary glycemic index in relation to metabolic risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Eur J Clin Nutr (2000) 54, 729–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Horn, L, Ernst, N, Buckley, GA summary of the science supporting the new National Cholesterol Education Program dietary recommendations: what dietitians should know. J Am Diet Assoc (2001) 10, 1148–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorster, HH, Oosthuizen, W, Jerling, JC, Veldman, FJ, Burger, HMThe Nutritional Status of South Africans. A Review of the Literature from 1975–1996 DurbanHealth Systems Trust (1997)Google Scholar
Vorster, HH, Venter, CS, Thompson, RLMargetts, BMEvidence-based nutrition – using a meta-analysis to review the literature. S Afr J Clin Nutr (2003) 16, 43–48Google Scholar
Willet, W, Manson, J, Liu, SGlycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr (2002) 76, 274S–280SSuppl.Google Scholar
Wolever, TJenkins, D, Vuksan, V, Jenkins, A, Buckley, G, Wong, G, Josse, RBeneficial effect of a low glycemic index diet in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med (1992 a) 9, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolever, TJenkins, D, Vuksan, V, Jenkins, A, Wong, G, Josse, RBeneficial effect of low-glycemic index diet in overweight NIDDM subjects. Diabetes Care (1992 b) 15, 562–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolever, T & Mehling, CLong-term effect of varying the source or amount of dietary carbohydrate on postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, and free fatty acid concentrations in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Am J Clin Nutr (2003) 77, 612–621.Google Scholar
Wolever, TMSDietary carbohydrates and insulin action in humans. Br J Nutr (2000) 83, S97–S102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolever, TMSCarbohydrate and the regulation of blood glucose and metabolism. Nutr Rev (2003) 61, S40–S48.Google Scholar
Wolever, TMS, Jenkins, DJA, Jenkins, ALJosse, RGThe glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. Am J Clin Nutr (1991) 54, 846–854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed