Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T23:14:10.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metabolic effects of altering the 24 h energy intake in man, using direct and indirect calorimetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2008

M. J. Dauncey
M. J. Dauncey
Affiliation:
MRC Dunn Calorimetry Group, ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The metabolic effects of increasing or decreasing the usual energy intake for only 1 d were assessed in eight adult volunteers. Each subject lived for 28 h in a whole-body calorimeter at 26° on three separate occasions of high, medium or low energy intake. Intakes (mean±SEM) of 13830 ± 475 (high), 8400 ± 510 (medium) and 3700 ± 359 (low) kJ/24 h were eaten in three meals of identical nutrient composition.

2. Energy expenditure was measured continuously by two methods: direct calorimetry, as total heat loss partitioned into its evaporative and sensible components; and indirect calorimetry, as heat production calculated from oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. For the twenty-four sessions there was a mean difference of only 1.2 ± 0.14 (SEM)% between the two estimates of 24 h energy expenditure, with heat loss being less than heat production. Since experimental error was involved in both estimates it would be wrong to ascribe greater accuracy to either one of the measures of energy expenditure.

3. Despite the wide variation in the metabolic responses of the subjects to over-eating and under-eating, in comparison with the medium intake the 24 h heat production increased significantly by 10% on the high intake and decreased by 6% on the low intake. Mean (± SEM) values for 24 h heat production were 8770 ± 288, 7896 ± 297 and 7495 ± 253 kJ on the high, medium and low intakes respectively. The effects of over-eating were greatest at night and the resting metabolic rate remained elevated by 12% 14 h after the last meal. By contrast, during under-eating the metabolic rate at night decreased by only 1%.

4. Evaporative heat loss accounted for an average of 25% of the total heat loss at each level of intake. Changes in evaporative heat loss were +14% on the high intake and −10% on the low intake. Sensible heat loss altered by +9% and −5% on the high and low intakes respectively.

5. It is concluded that (a) the effects on 24 h energy expenditure of over-feeding for only 1 d do not differ markedly from those estimated by some other workers after several weeks of increasing the energy intake; (b) the resting metabolic rate, measured at least 14 h after the last meal, can be affected by the previous day's energy intake; (c) the zone of ambient temperature within which metabolism is minimal is probably altered by the level of energy intake.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 257 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

Apfelbaum, M., Bostsarron, J. & Lacatis, D. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschoff, J. & Heise, A. (1972). In Advances in Climatic Physiology, p. 334 [Itoh, S., Ogaka, K. and Yoshimura, H., editors]. Tokyo: Igaku Shoin Ltd (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar
Benedict, F. G., Miles, W. R., Roth, P. & Smith, H. M. (1919). Publs Carnegie Instn no. 280.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 40, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H., Mount, L. E. & Start, I. B. (1971). Anim. Prod. 13, 285.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. (1979a). Int. J. Obesity 3, 19.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. (1979b). In 8th Symposium on Energy Metabolism. London: Butterworths (In the Press).Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. (1979c). Nutr. Food Sci. 60, 20.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. (1979d). J. hum. Nutr. (Lond.) 33, 259.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. & Ingram, D. L. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. & Murgatroyd, P. R. (1978). J. Physiol., Lond. 284, 7p.Google Scholar
Dauncey, M. J., Murgatroyd, P. R. & Cole, T. J. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, A. D. & Newton, W. H. (1948). Br. J. Nutr. 2, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Norgan, N. (1969). J. Physiol., Lond. 202, 106p.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlick, P. J., Clugston, G. A., Swick, R. W., Meinertzhagen, I. H. & Waterlow, J. C. (1978). Proc. Nutr. soc. 37, 33A.Google Scholar
Garrow, J. S. (1978). Energy Balance and Obesity in Man, 2nd ed.Amsterdam, New York and Oxford: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Garrow, J. S. (1978). In Recent Advances in Obesity Research II. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Obesity, p. 200 [Bray, G. A., editor]. London: Newman Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Glick, Z., Shvartz, E., Magazanik, A. & Modan, M. (1977). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 30, 1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G. (1959). J. agric. Sci., Camp. 52, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, F., Anderson, J. T. & Keys, A. (1958). J. appl. Physiol. 12, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulick, A. (1922). Am. J. Physiol. 60, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. L. & Kaciuba-Uscilko, H. (1977). J. Physiol., Lond. 270, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, R. T., Shetty, P. S. & James, W. P. T. (1979). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38,57A.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Brozek, J., Henschel, A., Mickelsen, O. & Taylor, H. L. (1950). The Biobgy of Human Starvation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, A. & Lindhard, J. (1920). Biochem. J. 14, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1967). The Composition of Foods. 3rd revised ed.London: H.M. Stationery office.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. (1975). In Obesity in Perspective, p. 137 [Bray, G. A., editor]. Washington DC: US Government Printing office.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Mumford, P. H. (1973). In Energy Balance in Man, p. 195. [Apfelbaum, , editor]. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S., Mumford, P. H. & Stock, M. J. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1950). Br. J. Nutr. 4 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, R., Meiklejohn, A. P.. Dewar, A. D. & Thow, R. K. (1955a). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, R., Meiklejohn, A. P., Dewar, A. D. & Thow, R. K. (1955b). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, R., Strong, J. A., Swindells, Y. E. & el Din, N. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, E. A. H. (1976). Clin. Endocr. Metab. 5,377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, J. A., Shirling, D. & Pascmore, R. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar