Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:38:28.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nitrogen balance in relation to energy intake in entire male pigs weighing 75 kg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. C. Dunkin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
J. L. Black
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
K. J. James
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Nitrogen balance (NB) was determined in entire male pigs weighing 75.6 (SE 0.56) kg and given 1.43 MJ metabolizable energy (ME)/kg live weight (LW)0.75 per d of semi-synthetic liquid diets which varied in crude protein (N x 6.38):ME from 2.5 to 14.5 g/MJ. Maximum NB of 20.8 g/d was reached with diets containing at least 6.2 g protein/MJ ME.

2. The relation between energy intake and NB was then examined in pigs of comparable live weight (mean 73.8 (SE 0.39) kg) and receiving a liquid diet not limiting in protein. The diet, containing 10.0 g protein/MJ ME, was given at eight rates from 0.24 MJ ME/kg LW0.75 per d to ad lib. by approximately equal increments. Two animals were allocated to each level and two animals were fasted during the balance period.

3. The animals fed ad lib. achieved a mean intake of 1.84 MJ ME/kg LW0.75 per d. NB increased linearly as ME intake increased up to 27.6 MJ/d (1.096 MJ/kg LW0.75per d) but thereafter remained constant at 22.8 g N/d.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. (1974). Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal Production 10, 211218.Google Scholar
Burlacu, G., Bain, G., Ionila, D., Moisa, D., Tascenco, V., Visan, I. & Stoioa, J. (1973). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 95302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G. & Dunkin, A. C. (1983 a). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 221230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G. & Dunkin, A. C. (1983 b). Animal Production 36, 185192.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Curic, D. M. (1983). Animal Production 36, 193199.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Curic, D. M. (1985). Animal Production 40, 497503Google Scholar
Close, W. H., Stanier, M. W. & Sanz Sampelayo, M. R. (1979). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 47A.Google Scholar
Colebrook, W. F. & Black, J. L. (1980). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Webster, A. J. F., MacPherson, R. M. & Smith, J. S, (1976). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 19, pp. 177180 [Vermorel, M., editor]. Clermont Ferrand, France: European Association of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Hodge, R. W. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, D. J. (1966). Journal of American Statistical Association 61, 10971129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. J., Cole, D. J. A. & Lewis, D. (1975). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., MacLeod, N. A., Fahmy, S. T. M., Istasse, L. & Hovell, F. D. De B. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Gaus, G., Michel, A., Susenbeth, A. & Menke, K. H. (1982). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 29, pp. 225228. [Ekern, A. and Sundstøl, F., editors]. Aas, Norway: European Association of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. & Fawcett, R. H. (1976). Animal Production 22, 8796.Google Scholar