Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:53:06.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passage and digestibility of lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay in Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and sheep under restricted feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. Katoh ,
Y. Kajita ,
M. Odashima ,
M. Ohta  and
Y. Sasaki
K. Katoh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Kawatabi University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981, Japan
Y. Kajita
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Kawatabi University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981, Japan
M. Odashima
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Kawatabi University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981, Japan
M. Ohta
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Kawatabi University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981, Japan
Y. Sasaki
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Kawatabi University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mean retention time (MRT) of stained hay through the whole digestive tract and its digestibility were measured in Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and were compared with those in sheep when lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay was fed at 10, 20 and 30 g/kg body-weight. The recoveries in faeces of plastic particles with five specific gravities were also measured in deer. MRT for deer was significantly shorter than that for sheep at 10 and 20 g/kg feeding levels. The digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter, and neutral-detergent fibre were significantly lower for deer than for sheep at 30, 30 and 10 g/kg feeding levels respectively. The recovery rates of plastic particles were increased, but the ruminated rates were decreased, with increasing specific gravity in deer. These results suggest that the lower digestibility of lucerne hay in Japanese deer may be due to a shorter MRT compared with sheep.

Keywords

Food passageDigestibilityRestricted feedingSika deer
Type
Kinetics of Digestion and Absorption
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , November 1991 , pp. 399 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Abe, A. (1988). Feed analyses based on the carbohydrates and its application to the nutrition value of feed. In Memoirs of the National Institute of Animal Industry No. 2. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Animal Industry.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. I. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361–388.Google Scholar
desBordes, C. K. & Welch, J. G. (1984). Influence of specific gravity on rumination and passage of indigestible particles. Journal of Animal Science 59, 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehle, F. R. (1984). Influence of feed particle density on particulate passage from rumen of Holstein cow. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The effect of formaldehyde treatment of a concentrate diet on the passage of solute and particle markers through the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 319–327.Google Scholar
Fennessy, P. F., Greer, G. J. & Forss, D. A. (1980). Voluntary intake and digestion in red deer and sheep. Proceedings of New Zealand Society of Animal Production 40, 158–162.Google Scholar
Henke, S. E., Demaris, S. & Pfister, J. A. (1988). Digestive capacity and diets of white-tailed deer and exotic ruminants. Journal of Wildlife Management 52, 595–598.Google Scholar
Hofmann, R. R. (1985). Digestive physiology of the deer -their morphophysiological specialization and adaptation. In Biology of Deer Production, pp. 393–407 [Fennessy, P. F. and Drew, K. R., editors]. Wellington: The Royal Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Katoh, K., Sato, F., Yamazaki, A., Sasaki, Y. & Tsuda, T. (1988). Passage of indigestible particles of various specific gravities in sheep and goats. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 683–687.Google Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1985). Seasonal variation of appetite in ruminants. In Recent Development in Animal Nutrition, pp. 199–210 [Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1987). Comparative studies of food propulsion in ruminants. Physiological and Pharmacological Aspects of the Reticulo-rumen, pp. 155–170 [Ooms, L. A. A., Degryse, A. D. and van Miert, A. S. J. P. A. M., editors]. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. & Goodall, E. D. (1976). The intake, digestibility and retention time of roughage diets by red deer (Cervus elaphus) and sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 98A–99A.Google Scholar
Lechner-Doll, M. & Kaske, M. (1991). Factors affecting the retention time of particles in the forestomach of ruminants and camelids. In Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants [Tsuda, T., Sasaki, Y. & Kawashima, R., editors]. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Macrae, J. C., Spence, A. M. & Wilson, S. (1978). A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer. British Journal of Nutrition 40, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poppi, D. P., Norton, B. W., Minson, D. J. & Hendricksen, R. E. (1980). The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takatsuki, S. (1989). Dwarf bamboo as forage for sika deer. In Proceedings, International Symposium on Deer Physiology and Production (Satellite Symposium of 7th International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, Sendai, 1989), pp. 76–77. Ishinomaki, Japan: Japan Deer Farm Association.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. & Waghorn, G. C. (1986). Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the ruminoreticulum. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 498–515 [Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. [Zar, J. H., editor]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar