Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Bailey, Andrew
and
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl
2008.
Does Deliberation Matter in FOMC Monetary Policymaking? The Volcker Revolution of 1979.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
404.
Monroe, Burt L.
Colaresi, Michael P.
and
Quinn, Kevin M.
2008.
Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
372.
Bailey, Andrew John
and
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl
2009.
Policy Shaping Politics: Monetary Policy Deliberations in Congressional Hearings, 1976-2008.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Mucciaroni, Gary
2011.
Are Debates about “Morality Policy” Really about Morality? Framing Opposition to Gay and Lesbian Rights.
Policy Studies Journal,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
187.
Bicquelet, Aude
and
Weale, Albert
2011.
Coping with the Cornucopia: Can Text Mining Help Handle the Data Deluge in Public Policy Analysis?.
Policy & Internet,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 4,
p.
1.
Proksch, Sven‐Oliver
and
Slapin, Jonathan B.
2012.
Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
520.
Diermeier, Daniel
Godbout, Jean-François
Yu, Bei
and
Kaufmann, Stefan
2012.
Language and Ideology in Congress.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Weale, Albert
Bicquelet, Aude
and
Bara, Judith
2012.
Debating Abortion, Deliberative Reciprocity and Parliamentary Advocacy.
Political Studies,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 3,
p.
643.
Bicquelet, Aude
Weale, Albert
and
Bara, Judith
2012.
In a Different Parliamentary Voice?.
Politics & Gender,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
83.
Kalaf-Hughes, Nicole
2013.
Position-taking in House debate and the issue of immigration.
Politics, Groups and Identities,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 4,
p.
488.
Debus, Marc
and
Bäck, Hanna
2014.
Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden: Eine Untersuchung anhand der parlamentarischen Debatten im Deutschen Bundestag von 1998 bis 2002.
Swiss Political Science Review,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
330.
Boräng, Frida
Eising, Rainer
Klüver, Heike
Mahoney, Christine
Naurin, Daniel
Rasch, Daniel
and
Rozbicka, Patrycja
2014.
Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods.
Interest Groups & Advocacy,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
p.
188.
Klüver, Heike
Mahoney, Christine
and
Opper, Marc
2015.
Framing in context: how interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission.
Journal of European Public Policy,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
481.
Vallbé, Joan-Josep
2015.
Frameworks for Modeling Cognition and Decisions in Institutional Environments.
Vol. 21,
Issue. ,
p.
155.
Bholat, David M.
Hansen, Stephen
Santos, Pedro M.
and
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl
2015.
Text Mining for Central Banks.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Klüver, Heike
and
Mahoney, Christine
2015.
Measuring interest group framing strategies in public policy debates.
Journal of Public Policy,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
223.
Beste, Simon
2016.
Studying dynamics of content and form in discourses: Evidence from an exploratory study of US legislative discourse on American–Iraqi relations 1995–2012.
Acta Politica,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 3,
p.
346.
Bicquelet, Aude
2017.
Using online mining techniques to inform formative evaluations: An analysis of YouTube video comments about chronic pain.
Evaluation,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
323.
Mustonen, Anne-Mari
Paakkonen, Tommi
Ryökäs, Esko
and
Nieminen, Petteri
2017.
Abortion debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: textual analysis of experiential thinking and argumentation in parliamentary and layperson discussions.
Reproductive Health,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
Anstead, Nick
2018.
The Idea of Austerity in British Politics, 2003–2013.
Political Studies,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 2,
p.
287.