Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:30:59.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The CPSU and Its Members: Between Communism and Postcommunism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Stephen White  and
Ian Mcallister
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Once dominant and unchallenged throughout the USSR, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union rapidly lost authority in the last two years of Soviet rule. Banned by Russian presidential decree after the failure of the attempted coup of August 1991, it was re-established in February 1993 and soon became the largest of the postcommunist parties. A 1992 survey of current and former party members as well as other Russians found that members were characterized by a relatively high degree of activism. They were disproportionately male, more affluent than non-members, and better provided with consumer goods. Younger respondents and religious believers were more likely to have left the party than their older colleagues. Those who still regarded themselves as party members were the most likely to oppose economic reform and support the collectivist principles of the communist era, particularly if they were activists; but the differences between members and non-members were not substantial, and both were found to hold generally pessimistic views on the postcommunist system. These findings suggest that, although former members will continue to be influential, CPSU membership is by itself likely to play a limited part in shaping the political direction of postcommunist Russia.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 105 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hill, Ronald J. in White, Stephen, Pravda, Alex and Gitelman, Zvi, eds, Developments in Soviet Politics (London: Macmillan and Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1990), p. 86.Google Scholar

2 See Hough, Jerry F., ‘Party Saturation in the Soviet Union’, in Hough, The Soviet Union and Social Science Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977), pp. 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Quoted in Unger, Aryeh L., ‘Images of the CPSU’, Survey, 23, no. 4 (1977–1978), 23–34, p. 24.Google Scholar

4 On the party's final stages see for instance Hill, Ronald J., ‘The CPSU: Decline and Collapse’, Irish Slavonic Studies, no. 12 (1991), 97–120Google Scholar; Hill, , ‘The CPSU: From Monolith to Pluralist?’, Soviet Studies, 43 (1991), 217–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; White, Stephen, ‘Rethinking the CPSU’, Soviet Studies, 43 (1991), 405–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harasymiw, Bohdan, ‘Changes in the Party's Composition: The “Destroyka” of the CPSU’, Journal of Communist Studies, 7, no. 2 (06 1991), 133–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Robinson, Neil, ‘Gorbachev and the Place of the Party in Soviet Reform, 1985–91’, Soviet Studies, 44 (1992), 423–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; di Leo, Rita, ‘The Soviet Communist Party 1988–91: From Power to Ostracism’, Coexistence, 29 (1992), 321–34Google Scholar; Millar, James R., ed., Cracks in the Monolith: Party Power in the Brezhnev Era (Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1992)Google Scholar; Rees, E. A., ed., The Soviet Communist Party in Disarray (London: Macmillan, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and White, Stephen, ‘Communists and Their Party in the Late Soviet Period’, Slavonic and East European Review, 72 (1994), 644–63.Google Scholar

5 Rossiiskaya gazeta, 4 03 1992, p. 2.Google Scholar

6 Kuranty, 1 12 1992, p. 1.Google Scholar

7 Pravda, 16 02 1993, pp. 1–2Google Scholar, and (for the wider association) Pravda, 30 03 1993, p. 2Google Scholar. On these developments see Ermakov, Ya. G. et al. , ‘Kommunisticheskoe dvizhenie v period zapreta: ot KPSS k KP RF’, Kentavr, no. 3 (1993), 65–80Google Scholar; and Lentini, Peter, ‘Post-CPSU Communist Political Formations’, Journal of Communist Studies, 8 (1993), 280–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Pravda, 2 04 1993, p. 2.Google Scholar

9 According to an unpublished survey conducted in December 1992 the Democratic party had the most widespread popular support (17.8 per cent viewed it ‘positively’), but the two main successor parties to the CPSU enjoyed 23.1 per cent support between them. See Institut prikladnoi politiki, ‘Politicheskie partii Rossii’ (Moscow, 1993, typescript)Google Scholar. The survey was based upon interviews with 1,500 respondents in four Russian regions; a short report appeared in Moskovskie novosti, no. 12 (1993), p. 9AGoogle Scholar. In the December 1993 elections the Communist Party of the Russian Federation took third place, with 13.6 per cent, but the communist-aligned Agrarians took a further 9 per cent and opposition parties together commanded about a third of the seats. For the results, see Segodnya, 28 12 1993, p. 1.Google Scholar

10 See, for instance, O'Donnell, Guillermo and Schmitter, Philippe C., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), chap. 4.Google Scholar

11 Materialy XIX Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii 28 iyunya–1 iyulya 1988 goda (Moscow: Politizdat, 1988), pp. 70–2.Google Scholar

12 Materialy XIX Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii, pp. 124–6.Google Scholar

13 Pravda, 10 02 1987, p. 2Google Scholar; Partiinaya zhizn', no. 11 (1988), p. 15.Google Scholar

14 Pravda, 1 10 1988, p. 1Google Scholar (the membership is listed in Pravda, 29 11 1988, pp. 1–2Google Scholar); Materialy Tsentral'nogo komiteta KPSS 8–9 oktyabrya 1990 goda (Moscow: Politizdat, 1990), p. 201.Google Scholar

15 Izvestiya TsK KPSS, no. 1 (1989), pp. 81–9.Google Scholar

16 It was in these terms that Gorbachev presented the decision: Materialy Tsentral'nogo komiteta KPSS 5–7 fevralya 1990 goda (Moscow: Politizdat, 1990), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

17 Gorbachev drew attention to this change in his address to the July 1991 Central Committee plenary meeting: Pravda, 26 07 1991, p. 2Google Scholar. In a survey conducted in December 1992, 33 per cent of former CPSU members said that they believed in God, 40 per cent said they did not, and the remaining 27 per cent either offered no response or found the question difficult to answer (Institut prikladnoi politiki, ‘Politicheskie partii Rossii’).Google Scholar

18 The amended party rules are in Materialy XXVIII s” ezda Kommunisticheskoi partii Sovetskogo Soyuza (Moscow: Politizdat, 1990), pp. 108–24.Google Scholar

19 Onikov, Leon in Pravda, 2 01 1989, p. 2.Google Scholar

20 Pravda, 10 07 1989, p. 2.Google Scholar

21 Onikov in Nezavisimaya gazeta, 26 03 1993, p. 2Google Scholar; similarly in Argumenty i fakty, 1992, no. 28, pp. 1, 4.Google Scholar

22 Pravda, 2 01 1989, p. 2.Google Scholar

23 Ivashko, Vladimir in Pravda, 2 02 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar

24 See Hanson, Philip and Teague, Elizabeth, ‘Soviet Communist Party loses members’, Radio Liberty/Radio Free Europe Report on the USSR, 18 05 1990, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

25 Pravda, 26 07 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar

26 Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1991, no. 3, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

27 Harasymiw, , ‘Changes in the Party's Composition’, p. 133.Google Scholar

28 Voprosy istorii KPSS, no. 8 (1989), p. 8.Google Scholar

29 Pravda, 12 10 1990, p. 3Google Scholar, and (for ‘severe economy’) Pravda, 12 03 1990, p. 3.Google Scholar

30 Argumenty i fakty, no. 48 (1990), p. 1.Google Scholar

31 Pravda, 29 07 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar

32 See respectively Izvestiya, 28 01 1990, p. 4, and 19 01 1990, p. 3Google Scholar; Pravda, 15 02 1990, p. 2, 26 02 1990, p. 3Google Scholar, 1 March 1990, p. 2, 11 February 1990, p. 2, and 13 February 1990, p. 3.

33 See Burtin, Yu., ed., Pul's Reform (Moscow: Progress, 1989), p. 71.Google Scholar

34 Pravda, 1 02 1990, p. 2.Google Scholar

35 Politicheskeskoe obrazovanie, no. 18 (1990), p. 6.Google Scholar

36 Pravda, 29 07 1991, p. 3.Google Scholar

37 On the developments see Hill, , ‘The CPSU’, pp. 217–35Google Scholar, and Rees, , ed., Soviet Communist Party, pp. 20–4.Google Scholar

38 Izvestiya TsK KPSS, no. 8 (1990), p. 133.Google Scholar

39 Novoe vremya, no. 12 (1991), p. 13.Google Scholar

40 Pravda, 26 02 1991, p. 3.Google Scholar

41 Izvestiya, 24 05 1991, p. 4.Google Scholar

42 The data are from the 1992 New Russia Barometer survey, collected by the All-Russian Centre for the Study of Public Opinion between 26 January and 25 February 1992. The sample was based upon the urban population aged 16 years and over, resident in the Russian Federation. The survey was conducted by means of personal interviews; the effective response rate was 82.9 per cent. The total sample size was 2,106, weighted by education to reflect the national population. A fuller account of the survey and the other results that were obtained is provided in Boeva, Irina and Shironin, Viacheslav, Russians between State and Market: The Generations Compared (Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, SPP 205, 1992).Google Scholar

43 The actual figure for CPSU membership in the unweighted data is considerably higher. However, we have weighted the data by education, to make it more representative of the general population, and since education is highly correlated with party membership (see Table 2) this necessarily reduces the estimates.

44 Rossiiskaya gazeta, 27 08 1991, p. 3Google Scholar, and Ivestiya, 30 08 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar

45 Izvestiya, 5 11 1991, p. 1Google Scholar (funds frozen), and Rossiiskaya gazeta, 9 11 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar

46 See, for instance, Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul, Labour's Grassroots: The Politics of Party Membership (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar

47 See Mordkovich, V. G., ‘Obshchestvenno-politicheskaya aktivnost' trudyashchikhsya’ (avtoreferat doktorskoi dissertatsii, Moscow: Gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii institut, 1974), p. 25 (Komsomol)Google Scholar; and Trud i lichnost' pri sotsializme, vyp. 2 (Perm': Permskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1973), p. 46Google Scholar, and Ermuratsky, V. N., ed., Sotsial'naya aktivnost' rabotnikov promyshlennogo predpriyatiya (Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 1973), p. 110.Google Scholar

48 In the early 1980s, for instance, 76 in every 1,000 members of the population aged 10 or over had a higher education, or 110 for every 1,000 members of the labour force (Narodnoe khozyaistvo SSSR 1922–1982: Yubileinyi statisticheskii ezhegodnik (Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 1982), p. 42.Google Scholar

49 Akademiya obshchestvennykh nauk TsK KPSS, Tsentr sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii, Politicheskaya sotsiologiya: Informatsionnyi byulleten', no. 3 (1991), pp. 14–16Google Scholar (we are grateful to Simon Clarke for making this source available to us).

50 Argumenty i fakty, 1994, no. 35, p. 3.Google Scholar

51 Kryshtanovskaya, Ol'ga, ‘Transformatsiya staroi nomenklatury v novuyu rossiiskuyu elitu’ (unpublished manuscript, Moscow, 1994), Table 9.Google Scholar

52 In January 1990, 6.8 million party members (35.4 percent of the total) had a completed higher education (Izvestiya TsK KPSS, no. 4 (1990), p. 114Google Scholar); this compared with 20.2 million within the working population as a whole (Narodnoe khozyaistvo SSSR v 1989 godu (Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 1990), p. 187).Google Scholar

53 Kommunist, no. 12 (1991), pp. 8, 4.Google Scholar

54 In December 1989, 23 per cent of Russians ‘completely trusted’ the CPSU; by late 1991, just after the coup, the level of trust was down to 2.3 per cent (Ivestiya, 1 10 1991, p. 9Google Scholar). And who was responsible for the crisis in which the Soviet Union found itself at the end of the 1980s? For 11.4 per cent it was ‘the people’ and for 17.4 per cent ‘the party, including its rank and file’; but 29.2 per cent blamed ‘the current party leadership’, and 37.1 per cent ‘former leaders’ (Obshchestvennoe mnenie v tsifrakh, 10, No. 17 (04 1990), p. 17).Google Scholar

55 See, for instance, Mir mnenii i mneniya o mire, 10, No. 76 (09 1993)Google Scholar, a Russia-wide survey of the desired attributes of a future president.

56 Literaturnaya gazeta, 20 02 1991, pp. 1, 3.Google Scholar