Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:47:55.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Models in Political Science: the Case of ‘Exit Voice, and Loyalty’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

A. H Birch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a valuable recent article, Brian Barry has given us an extended commentary on the logic of Albert Hirschman's Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, which Barry rightly regards as a good example of that phenomenon of American political science,

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 69 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Barry, Brian, ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty’, British Journal of Political Science, IV (1974), 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Barry, , ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty’, p. 80.Google Scholar

3 Somit, Albert and Tannenhaus, Joseph, The Development of American Political Science: from Burgess to Behavioralism (Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1967), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar

4 Halsey, A. H. and Trow, M. A., The British Academics (London:Faber and Faber, 1971), p. 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 The exceptions include two or three people who started to teach before the war and four or five who came to Britain after 1959 from overseas. But the latter were substantially outnumbered by British lecturers who went overseas to further their careers.

6 Naturally, the above comments only hold good to the extent that scholars are motivated by consideration of individual costs and benefits. This is the nature of economic analysis.

7 Both these quotations are taken from an article in the Observer, London, 10 03 1974.Google Scholar

8 Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

9 Barry, , 'Exit, Voice, and Loyalty', pp. 95 and 97.Google Scholar

10 Barry, , ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty’, p. 91.Google Scholar

11 Hirschman, , ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty’, p. 77.Google Scholar

12 Barry, , ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty’, p. 91.Google Scholar

13 Hirschman, , Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, p. 78.Google Scholar

14 See Wright, Maurice, ‘The Professional Conduct of Civil Servants’, Public Administration, LI (1973), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 When a 15-year-old schoolgirl in Southampton killed herself because of school bullying, it was revealed that in the previous year in the same city (population 213,000) twenty-eight other schoolgirls had attempted suicide. A local psychiatrist said that hospitals and clinics were having to deal with more and more children 'who have developed acute anxiety in school and are showing very negative attitudes towards their teachers'. Quoted in the Daily Mail, 5 03 1974.Google Scholar

16 Barry, , 'Exit, Voice, and Loyalty', p. 88.Google Scholar

17 See Downs, Anthony, An EconomicTheory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957).Google Scholar

18 See, for instance, Mitchell, William C., ‘The Shape of Political Theory to Come: From Political Sociology to Political Economy’, American Behavioral Scientist, XI (1967), 8–37;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Curry, R. L. and Wade, L. L., A Theory of Political Exchange: Economic Reasoning in Political Analysis (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968).Google Scholar

19 This was the case in the 1966 general election, though in some other general elections the relationship has been insignificant. See Butler, David and King, Anthony, The British General Election of 1966(London: Macmillan, 1966), p. 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 See Barry, Brian, Sociologists, Economists and Democracy (London: Collier-Macmillan, 1970), p. 166.Google Scholar