¹ For example, on the British unions see Morgan, Kevin, ‘Restructuring Steel: The Crises of Labour and Locality in Britain’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1 (1983), 189–92Google Scholar; Vaizey, J., The History of British Steel (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1974), p. 26Google Scholar; Docherty, C., Steel and Steel-Workers: The Sons of Vulcan (London: Heinemann, 1983), pp. 3–4, 22–53Google Scholar; Taylor, Robert, The Fifth Estate: Britain's Unions in the Seventies (London: Pan, 1980), p. 65Google Scholar. On the German IG-Metall, see Willey, Richard J., ‘Trade Unions and Political Parties in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 28 (1974), 38–59, p. 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scharpf, Fritz W., ‘The Political Economy of Inflation and Unemployment in Western Europe: An Outline’ (unpublished paper from the Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin, 1981), pp. 31–2Google Scholar; Dyson, K., ‘The Politics of Economic Recession in West Germany’, in Cox, A., ed., Politics, Policy and the European Recession (London: Macmillan, 1981), pp. 55–6.Google Scholar

² Vaizey, , The History of British Steel, p. 26.Google Scholar

³ Richardson, J. J. and Dudley, Geoffrey, ‘Steel Policy in the UK: The Politics of Industrial Decline’, Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, 10 (1983), p. 17.Google Scholar

⁴ Quoted in Baumier, Jean, La Fin des maîtres de forges (Paris: Plon, 1981), p. 171.Google Scholar

⁵ See Chakravarty, S. P. et al. , ‘The End of Steel-Making at Shotton’ (unpublished paper), pp. 13–19Google Scholar; Docherty, , Steel and Steel-workers, p. 134Google Scholar; Financial Times, 22 09 1978 and 17 08 1980Google Scholar; The Economist, 11 03 and 16 09 1978Google Scholar; Sunday Times, 13 02 1973Google Scholar; Le Monde, 26 02 1980, 10 11 1983Google Scholar; Le Soir (Brussels) 8–9 02 1981Google Scholar; Gouazé, S. L., ‘La Sidérurgie ouest-allemande et la crise: de l'économie du marché à l'économie dirigée’, Problèmes Économiques, 1, No. 790 (22 09 1982), 2–10, p. 9Google Scholar; Malézieux, Jacques, ‘La Crise de la sidérurgie: aspects géographiques’, Annales de Géographie, 86 (1977), 408–24, p. 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hirsch, Mario, ‘Tripartism in Luxembourg: The Limits of Social Concertation’, West European Politics, 9 (1986), 54–66, p. 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Als, George, Le Luxembourg: Situation politique, économique et sociale (Paris: Documentation Française, 1982), pp. 91–3Google Scholar; La Repubblica, 29 06 and 9 09 1983.Google Scholar

⁶ ‘Le transfer des Lorrains à Fos-sur-Mer’, Annuaire de l'Aménagement du Territoire, 8 (1977), 101–28Google Scholar and Chakravarty, et al. , ‘The End of Steel-Making at Shotton’.Google Scholar

⁷ Malézieux, , ‘La Crise de la sidérurgie’, p. 417Google Scholar; Pellegrini, C., ‘Technological Change and Industrial Relations in Italy’, Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations, 12 (1982), 193–209, p. 202.Google Scholar

⁸ On the intentions, see Le Monde, 3 12 1982Google Scholar. On the 1984 programme, see Libération, 23 01 1984.Google Scholar

⁹ For the following details see, for BSC Industry, The Economist, 10 09 and 8 10 1983Google Scholar; Financial Times, 17 08 1981, 7 12 1981, 20 05 1982, 18 10 1983Google Scholar; The Times, 18 06 1986Google Scholar; Villiers, Charles, ‘Job Creation by the BSC in Major Steel Closure Areas’, Steel in the 80s (Paris: OECD, 1980), pp. 200–5Google Scholar. On the Federal Republic, see Europe, 29–30 03 1982Google Scholar. On France, see Frimat, Bernard, ‘Logique systémique de la conversion industrielle et de son ećhec: le cas de Valenciennais’, in ADEFI, Les Restructurations industrielles en France (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 190Google Scholar; Le Monde, 16 01 1979 (on the FSAI), and 29 04, 8 06 and 29 09 1983Google Scholar; Financial Times, 18 06 1982Google Scholar. On Italy, see La Repubblica, 14 and 19 06 1983Google Scholar; Il Sole – 24 Ore, 14 07 1983.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Hirsch, , ‘Tripartism in Luxembourg’, p. 60.Google Scholar

¹¹ McGregor, Ian, ‘Recovery at British Steel’, Journal of General Management, 1 (1982), 5–16, p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² Noiriel, G., Vivre et latter à Longwy (Paris: Maspéro, 1980), p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Dudley, G. T., ‘Pluralism, Policy-Making and Implementation: The Evolution of the BSC's Development Strategy with Reference to the Activity of the Shelton Action Committee’, Public Administration, 57 (1979), 253–70, p. 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bryer, R. A., Brignall, T. J. and Maunders, A. R., Accounting for British Steel (Aldershot, Hants: Gower, 1982), p. 260.Google Scholar

¹⁴ On the steel committee, see Taylor, , The Fifth Estate, pp. 87–8Google Scholar, and Bryer, et al. , Accounting for British Steel, pp. 241–70Google Scholar. On the problem of co-ordination, see Morgan, , ‘Restructuring Steel’, pp. 189, 192Google Scholar, and Cottrell, E., The Giant with the Feet of Clay (London: Centre for Policy Studies, 1981), pp. 133–4Google Scholar. On the traditional rivalries, see Ovenden, Keith, The Politics of Steel (London: Macmillan, 1979), pp. 86–8.Google Scholar

¹⁵ The CGIL (Confederazione Generale Italiana dei Lavoratori), which is close to the PCI; the CISL (Confederazione Italiana Sindicati Lavoratori), close to Catholic circles; and UIL (Unione Italiana dei Lavoratori), which reflects minority centre and socialist views.

¹⁶ Judith, Rudolf, ‘Managing the Consequences of the Steel Crisis’ (unpublished, Essen, 1982), p. 5.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Thimm, Alfred L., ‘The German Steel Strike of 1978–1979: Implications and Consequences’, Columbia Journal of World Business (Spring 1979), 52–67, p. 62.Google Scholar

¹⁸ For divisions in the French union movement see Lange, Peter, Ross, George and Vannicelli, Maurizio, Unions, Change and Crisis: French and Italian Union Strategy and the Political Economy, 1945–1980 (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1982), pp. 63–4.Google Scholar

¹⁹ For details, see Installé, M., ‘L'Industrie sidérurgique en Belgique’, Courrier Hebdomadaire du CRISP (15 11 1974), pp. 660–2.Google Scholar

²⁰ Le Soir, 17 11 1983.Google Scholar

²¹ Morgan, , ‘Restructuring Steel’, pp. 190–6Google Scholar; Aylen, Jonathan, ‘Plant Size and Efficiency in the Steel Industry: An International Comparison’, National Institute Economic Review, 100 (1982), pp. 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; de Gaudemar, Jean-Paul, ‘De la fabrique au site: naissance de l'usine mobile’, in his Usines el ouwiers: figures du nouvel ordre productif (Paris: Maspéro, 1980), pp. 13–40Google Scholar: Geneviève, and Gourc, Jacques, ‘La Restructuration de la sidérurgie dans les usines performantes: la Solmer a Fos-sur-Mer’, Critique de l'Économie Politique, 15–16 (04–06 1981), pp. 135–84.Google Scholar

²² Broda, Jacques, Demailly, Serge and Labruyère, Chantal, ‘Crise de la sidérurgie et recomposition du procès de travail; la sous-traitance à la Solmer’, Sociologie du Travail, 20 (1978), 423–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²³ On Taranto, see the contribution of A. Masi in Mény, and Wright, , The Politics of SteelGoogle Scholar, and on Fos see Gourc, and Gourc, , ‘La Restructuration’.Google Scholar

²⁴ There is a good general discussion of these issues in Batstone, Eric and Gourlay, Stephen, Unions, Unemployment and Innovation (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar

²⁵ Zoll, Rainer, ‘Les Syndicats devant la crise en RFA’, Allemagne d'Aujourd'hui, 77 (1981), 56–69, p. 61Google Scholar; Bryer, et al. , Accounting for British Steel, pp. 241–70.Google Scholar

²⁶ On union strategies, see Padioleau, Jean, Quand la France s'enferre (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1981), pp. 69–70Google Scholar. For examples, see the CGT's Face à la crise de la sidérurgie of 1978Google Scholar and the ISTC's New Deal for Steel of 1980.

²⁷ Schröter, Lutz, ‘Steelwork Now: The Conflicting Character of Modernization, a Case Study of Hoesch in Dortmund’ (unpublished paper presented to a conference jointly organized in 1982 by the International Institute for Management and the Wissenschaftszentrum of Berlin), p. 18.Google Scholar

²⁸ See the chapter by Esser, Josef and Väth, Werner in Mény, and Wright, , The Politics of Steel.Google Scholar

²⁹ One of the themes of Esser, Josef, Gewerkschaften in der Krise (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1982)Google Scholar. See also Armingeon, Klaus, ‘Co-operative Unionism in Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany: A Review of Recent Literature’, European Journal of Political Research, 2 (1983), 333–44, p. 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁰ Barisi, G., ‘Relations collectives de travail et stratégies des acteurs sociaux dans la sidérurgie à participation d'État en Italie’ (doctoral dissertation, University of Paris, 1982), pp. 9–12, 42–3, 62–8.Google Scholar

³¹ Il Sole – 24 Ore, 18 09 1983.Google Scholar

³² See Judith, Rudolf (a prominent member of IG-Metall), ‘Beschäftigungsauswirkungen der Stahlkrise and Massnahmen zur Arbeitsplatzbeschaffung’ (unpublished paper, 05 1982)Google Scholar; von Nell-Breuning, Oswald, ‘Wie Kam es zur Montan-Mitbestimmung’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 32 (1981), 386–95Google Scholar and the special issue of that journal, 33 (1982), devoted to the problem; Spieker, W., ‘Mitbestimmung in Unternehmen-Idee und Wirklichkeit’, WSI Mitteilungen, 29 (1976), pp. 437–45Google Scholar. A good early account of codetermination in English is Blumenthal, W. Michael, Codetermination in the German Steel Industry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956)Google Scholar. There is also the equally useful more recent account in Thimm, Alfred L., The False Promise of Codetermination (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1980).Google Scholar

³³ See, for example, Bill Sirs (of the ISTC), ‘The Problems of the Labour Force and Readaptation and Reemployment Policies’, Steel in the 80s, pp. 174–5.Google Scholar

³⁴ Mannesmann planned to reorganize its pipes and steel divisions in such a way as to get round the rules established by the 1951 law. A bitter dispute ensued between the unions (which feared that Thyssen and Krupp, which had also diversified out of steel, might also follow suit) and the firm. The dispute was to divide the ruling coalition in Bonn. See Adamy, Wilhelm, ‘Mitbestimmung zwischen gesetzestext und wirklichkeit’, Wirtschaftsidients, 60 (1980), 498–503Google Scholar. We are indebted to Mrs Dorothea Schlägel and Dr Claus Arndt for clarifying the problem for us.

³⁵ For a brief analysis in comparative perspective, see Rhodes, M., ‘Organized Interests and Industrial Crisis Management: Restructuring the Steel Industry in West Germany, Italy and France’, in Cawson, A., ed., Organized Interests and the State (London: Sage Publications, 1985), pp. 192–220.Google Scholar

³⁶ Financial Times, 12 06 1981.Google Scholar

³⁷ On the JSG see Ovenden, , The Politics of Steel, pp. 175–84Google Scholar. On worker directors at BSC see Branner, Peter, Batstone, Eric, Fatchett, Derek and White, Philip, The Worker Directors (London: Hutchinson, 1976)Google Scholar. See also Worker Directors Speak (Farnborough, Hants: Gower Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Docherty, , Steel and Steel-Workers, p. 135Google Scholar; Financial Times, 1 12 1979, 21 02 and 19 06 1981.Google Scholar

³⁸ See Sirs, Bill, Managing the Consequences of the Steel Crisis (unpublished paper to Anglo-German Conference held at Essen, 1982), p. 5Google Scholar. See also Financial Times, 16 04 and 14 11 1981.Google Scholar

³⁹ For this and for following details see Erbes-Seguin, S. and Voltz, R., ‘Les Syndicats face a l'évolution économique en Allemagne Fédérale et en France’ (unpublished report, Croupe de Sociologie du Travail, CNRS-University of Paris VII, 1972), Vol. II, pp. 184, 204–6Google Scholar; Stora, Benjamin, Crise, puissance, perspectives de la sidérurgie mondiale (Paris: Economica, 1979), p. 131Google Scholar; Kern, F., ‘Croissance et crise de la sidérurgie française’ (doctoral dissertation, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, 1982), p. 542Google Scholar; Baumier, , La Fin des maîtres de forges, pp. 12, 171Google Scholar; Padioleau, , Quand la France s'enferre, pp. 59, 69Google Scholar; Le Monde, 6 10 1982.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Paese Sera, 8 12 1981Google Scholar; Financial Times, 10 09 1982, 9 11 1982Google Scholar; Corriere della Sera, 2 08 1983Google Scholar; La Repubbtica, 9 and 20 09 1983Google Scholar; Il Sole – 24 Ore, 18 09 1983.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Underbill, Geoffrey, ‘The French Textile and Clothing Industries: Domestic Economic Management in an Era of International Capital’ (doctoral dissertation, Oxford University, 1987), Chap. VII.Google Scholar

⁴² Morgan, , ‘Restructuring Steel’, pp. 190–6.Google Scholar

⁴³ Le Monde, 26 03 1979.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Morgan, , ‘Restructuring Steel’, pp. 190–6Google Scholar; Financial Times, 5 09 1980 and 22 11 1982.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Financial Times, 6 04, 22 05, 20 08, 26 09 and 1 10 1981, 25 02 1982.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See the chapter by John Eisenhammer in Meny, and Wright, , The Politics of Steel.Google Scholar See also Morgan, , ‘Restructuring Steel’, pp. 190–6Google Scholar; Financial Times, 22 05 1981 and 4 05 1983.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ On Lorraine see Noiriel, , Vivre el lutterGoogle Scholar; Baumier, , La Fin des maîtres de forgesGoogle Scholar;Durand, C., Chomage et violence: Longwy en lutte (Paris: Editions Galilée, 1981)Google Scholar, Nouvel Observateur, 12 03 1979.Google Scholar On Belgium, see Le Soir for that period.

⁴⁸ Economist, 14 04 1979.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ For details see Mény, and Wright, , ‘Introduction’, in The Politics of Steel.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Geneviève, and Gourc, Jacques, ‘Solmer: février-juin 1979, le conflit social le plus dur dans les usines performantes’, Critiques del'Économie Politique, 15–16 (1981), 135–84, p. 182.Google Scholar

⁵¹ On the strikes in the German steel industry see Zoll, , ‘Les Syndicats devant la crise’, pp. 62–3Google Scholar; Thimm, , ‘The German Steel Strike’, pp. 52–67Google Scholar; Willey, , ‘Trade Unions and Political Parties’, pp. 56–8Google Scholar; ‘How steel was hi-jacked’, Agenor, 04–05 1984, pp. 32–5Google Scholar; The Economist, 16 12 1978 and 13 01 1979.Google Scholar

⁵² Dyson, , ‘The Politics of Economic Recession’, pp. 52–3.Google Scholar

⁵³ Financial Times, 22–5 04 1981Google Scholar; Thimm, , ‘The German Steel Strike’, p. 66.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ See Le Soir for the periods in question.

⁵⁵ The Economist, 31 01 1981.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ The Economist, 23 02 1980.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ On the events leading up to and during the strike see Cottrell, , The Giant with the Feet of Clay, p. 123Google Scholar; Docherty, , Steel and Steel-Workers, p. 162.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Cox, Andrew and Hayward, Jack, ‘The Inapplicability of the Corporatist Model in Britain and France: The Case of Labour’, International Political Science Review, 2 (1983), 217–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schain, Martin, ‘Corporatism and Industrial Relations in France’, in Cerny, P. G. and Schain, M. A., French Politics and Public Policy (London: Frances Pinter, 1980), pp. 191–217.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Hirsch, , ‘Tripartism in Luxembourg’, pp. 54–66.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Esser, Joseph, ‘Krisenregulierung und gewerkschaften – Das beispeil des saarländischen stahlindustrie’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 29 (1978), 772–81Google Scholar; Esser, J., Fach, W., Gierszewski, G. and Väth, W., ‘Steel Crisis and Steel Policy: A Comparison’, Intereconomics, 11–12 1982, 279–85, p. 279Google Scholar; Zoll, , ‘Les Syndicats devant la crise’, p. 61.Google Scholar

⁶¹ See chapter by Michel Capron in Mény, and Wright, , The Politics of Steel.Google Scholar

⁶² La Repubblica, 13–14 01 1983.Google Scholar

⁶³ Barisi, , Relations collectives de travail, pp. 61–2.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Hirsch, , ‘Tripartism in Luxembourg’, pp. 54–66.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Moers, Jean, ‘Des mesures d'airain pour Pacier’, La Nouvelle Revue, 65 (1977), 380–91.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Le Monde, 19 01 1981Google Scholar, and interview with Gérard Delruelle, head of Cockerill-Sambre, , in Le Soir, 8 08 1983.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Le Monde, 25 11 1982, 11 and 15 02 1983Google Scholar; Financial Times, 19 04 1983.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Schröter, , ‘Steelwork Now’, p. 19Google Scholar; Financial Times, 23 02 1983.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Rhodes, , ‘Organised Interests’, pp. 209–16.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Baumier, , La Fin des maîtres de forge, pp. 162–3.Google Scholar

⁷¹ See the interview with Sir Peter Carey, Permanent Secretary of the Industry Ministry of the United Kingdom from 1976 to 1983 in Financial Times, 5 05 1983.Google Scholar

⁷² Hirsch, , ‘Tripartism in Luxembourg’, p. 61Google Scholar; Schreter, , ‘Steelwork Now’, p. 19.Google Scholar

⁷³ Streeck, Wolfgang, ‘Das Dilemma der Organisation. Tarifverbende zwischen interessenvertretung und stabilitätspolitik’ in Meissner, Werner and Underseher, Lutz, Verteilungskampf und Stabilitätspolitik (Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1972)Google Scholar; Müller-Jentsch, Walther, ‘Vom Gewerkschaftlichen Doppelcharakter und seiner Theoretischen Aufiesung im Neo-Korporatismus’ in Gesellschaften Arbeit und Rationalisierung Leviathan (Sonderheft 4, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1981)Google Scholar; Alexis, Marion, ‘Neo-corporatism and Industrial Relations: The Case of German Trade Unions’, West European Politics, 6 (1983), 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sabel, Charles F., ‘The Internal Politics of Trade Unions’, in Berger, Suzanne, ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 209–44.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ See, for example, the speech of one of the leaders of the Italian FLM, in La Repubblica, 13 01 1983.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ La Repuhblica, 22 07 1983.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ On the general problem see Ross, George, ‘French Labour and Economic Change’ in Cohen, S. S. and Gourevitch, P. A., France in the Troubled World Economy (London: Butterworth, 1981), pp. 151–79.Google Scholar On the inefficacy of union organization at European Community level see Barnouin, Barbara, The European Labour Movement and European Integration (London: Frances Pinter, 1986).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Frimat, , ‘Logique systémique’, p. 190.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Brandt, Gerhard, ‘Technological Change, Labour Market and Trade Union Policy’, in Jacobi, Otto, Jessop, Bob, Hastendiek, Hans and Regini, Mario, Technological Change, Rationalisation and Industrial Relations (London: Croom Helm, 1986).Google Scholar This work deals with some of the issues raised here. For an excellent and nuanced study of some of these issues see Batstone, and Gourlay, , Unions, Unemployment and Innovation.Google Scholar