Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:58:48.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compensation or Constraint? How Different Dimensions of Economic Globalization Affect Government Spending and Electoral Turnout

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

John Marshall  and
Stephen D. Fisher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article extends theoretical arguments regarding the impact of economic globalization on policy making to electoral turnout and considers how distinct dimensions of globalization may produce different effects. It theorizes that constraints on government policy that reduce incentives to vote are more likely to be induced by foreign ownership of capital, while compensation through increased government spending is more likely (if at all) to be the product of structural shifts in production associated with international trade. Using data from twenty-three OECD countries from 1970–2007, the study finds strong support for the ownership-constraint hypothesis in which foreign ownership reduces turnout, both directly and – in strict opposition to the compensation hypothesis – indirectly by reducing government spending (and thus the importance of politics). The results suggest that increased foreign ownership, especially the most mobile capital flows, can explain up to two-thirds of the large declines in turnout over recent decades.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 353 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Marshall, Department of Government, Harvard University (email: jlmarsh@fas.harvard.edu – corresponding author); Fisher, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford (email: stephen.fisher@sociology.ox.ac.uk). We are grateful to Mark Franklin for a copy of the aggregate data used in his book; to Nicholas Fawcett and especially Mark Pickup for advice on statistical modelling; and to Yves Dejaeghere, Nilesh Fernando, Mark Franklin, Torben Iversen, Philipp Rehm, Nils Steiner, Jack Vowles, Hugh Ward, three anonymous referees, and participants and presentations at Harvard University and the University of Oxford and the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 2008 and American Political Science Association 2010 conferences for comments on earlier versions of the article. Data replication sets and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123413000422

References

Aarts, Kees Wessels, Bernhard. 2005. Electoral Turnout. In The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, edited by Jacques Thomassen, 64–83. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abiad, Abdul Mody, Ashoka. 2005. Financial Reform: What Shakes It? What Shapes It? American Economic Review 95 (1):66–88.Google Scholar
Abrams, Samuel, Iversen, Torben Soskice, David. 2010. Informal Social Networks and Rational Voting. British Journal of Political Science 41 (2):229–257.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, Los Angeles, CA, 20–22 July.Google Scholar
Alderson, Arthur S. 2004. Explaining the Upswing in Direct Investment: A Test of Mainstream and Heterodox Theories of Globalization. Social Forces 83 (1):81–122.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1993. Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37 (1):246–278.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1988. Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System With Rational Voters. American Economic Review 78 (4):796–805.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antràs, Pol. 2003. Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4):1375–1418.Google Scholar
Antràs, Pol Helpman, Elhanan. 2004. Global Sourcing. Journal of Political Economy 112 (3):552–580.Google Scholar
Arellano, Manuel Bond, Stephen. 1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2):277–297.Google Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Engler, Sarah, Potolidis, Panajotis, Gerber, Marlène, Leimgruber, Philipp. 2009. Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2008. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne, available at http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_eng.html Google Scholar
Autor, David H., Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon H.. 2013. The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review,103 (6):2121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2005. Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):924–938.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. What To Do (And Not To Do) With Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review 89 (3):634–647.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N.. 2004. Time-Series-Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics, working paper. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/politics/faculty/beck/beckkatz.pdf Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas Achini, Christoph. 2000. From ‘Real’ to ‘Virtual’ States? Integration of the World Economy and its Effects on Government Activity. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2):223–276.Google Scholar
Bernhard, William Leblang, David. 2002. Democratic Processes, Political Risk, and Foreign Exchange Markets. American Journal of Political Science 46 (2):316–333.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2000. To Vote or Not To Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2006. What Affects Turnout? Annual Review of Political Science 9:111–125.Google Scholar
Blais, André Dobrzynska, Agnieszka. 1998. Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 33 (2):239–261.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth Nevitte, Neil. 2004. Where Does Turnout Decline Come from? European Journal of Political Research 43 (2):221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André Aarts, Kees. 2006. Electoral Systems and Turnout. Acta Politica 41 (2):180–196.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Massicotte, Louis Dobrzynska, Agnieszka. 2003. Why is Turnout Higher in Some Countries?. Montréal: Elections Canada.Google Scholar
Blais, André Carty, R.K.. 1990. Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout? European Journal of Political Research 18 (2):167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, Richard Bond, Stephen. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1):115–143.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2000. Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960–93. World Politics 53 (1):38–73.Google Scholar
Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. Lee, J.W.. 1998. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics 45 (1):115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretschger, Lucas Hettich, Frank. 2002. Globalisation, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Economy 18 (4):695–716.Google Scholar
Brockington, David. 2009. It's About the Benefits: Choice Environments, Ideological Proximity and Individual Participation in 28 Democracies. Party Politics 15 (4):435–454.Google Scholar
Brülhart, Marius. 2009. An Account of Global Intra-industry Trade, 1962–2006. The World Economy 32 (3):401–459.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giovanni S.F. 2005. Approximating the Bias of the LSDV Estimator for Dynamic Unbalanced Panel Data Models. Economics Letters 87 (3):361–366.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties That Bind. International Organization 55 (3):509–551.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2009. Globalization and Backlash: Polayni's Revenge? Review of International Political Economy 16 (2):145–177.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2012. Partisan Embedding of Liberalism: How Trade, Investment, and Immigration Affect Party Support for the Welfare State. Comparative Political Studies 45 (5):606–635.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 72 (4):1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1998. Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Postwar Transformation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elger.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip G. 1997. Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization. Government and Opposition 32 (2):251–274.Google Scholar
Clouse, Clayton. 2011. Changes in Congressional Turnout, 1972–2006. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21 (4):453–472.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. 1991. Benefits and Costs of Voting. Electoral Studies 10 (4):313–325.Google Scholar
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2003. CSES Module 1 Full Release. Available from www.cses.org Google Scholar
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2007. CSES Module 2 Full Release. Available from www.cses.org Google Scholar
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2012. CSES Module 3 Full Release. Available from www.cses.org Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Gaston, Noel Martens, Pim. 2008. Measuring Globalisation: Gauging its Consequences. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2010. The Global Economy, Competency, and the Economic Vote. Journal of Politics 72 (1):1–19.Google Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan, Kramarz, Francis Kortum, Samuel. 2011. An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence from French Firms. Econometrica 79 (5):1453–1498.Google Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy Sandroni, Alvaro. 2006. A Theory of Participation in Elections. American Economic Review 96 (4):1271–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Stephen D. 2007. (Change in) Turnout and (Change in) the Left Share of the Vote. Electoral Studies 26 (3):598–611.Google Scholar
Fisher, Stephen D., Lessard-Phillips, Laurence, Hobolt, Sara B. Curtice, John. 2008. Disengaging Voters: Do Plurality Systems Discourage the Less Knowledgeable from Voting? Electoral Studies 27 (1):89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, John R. 2008. Democracy and Markets in the Twenty-first Century: An Agenda. In International Perspectives on Contemporary Democracy, edited by Peter F. Nardulli, 183–220. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. Huber, John D.. 2000. Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1):94–103.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 2010. Election Indices. Available at http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/Docts/ElectionIndices.pdf Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. Capital Mobility, Trade, and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy. International Organization 49 (4):657–687.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 2001. Globalization and Government Spending Around the World. Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (4):3–29.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey Mitchell, Deborah. 2001. Globalization and the Welfare State: Income Transfers in the Advanced Industrialised Democracies, 1965–1990. European Journal of Political Research 39 (2):145–177.Google Scholar
Geys, Benny. 2006. Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate Level Research. Electoral Studies 25 (4):637–663.Google Scholar
Gordon, Roger H. 1986. Taxation of Investment and Savings in a World Economy. American Economic Review 76 (5):1086–1102.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive W.J. Newbold, Paul. 1974. Spurious Regression in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2:111–120.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark Caul, Miki. 2000. Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies 1950 to 1997: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilisation. Comparative Political Studies 33 (9):1091–1122.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A. 1978. Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46 (6):1251–1273.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin Wincott, Daniel. 2012. The Political Economy of European Welfare Capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy T. 2001. Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting. Journal of Politics 63 (4):1141–1162.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy T. 2008. Globalization, Policy Constraints, and Vote Choice. Journal of Politics 70 (4):1128–1141.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy T. 2011. The World Economy, Political Control, and Responsibility for Economic Performance. Paper prepared for the conference European Responses to the Economic Crisis: Lessons for the United States, Indiana University, Bloomington, 8 April 8.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy T. Samuels, David. 2007. Voting in Open Economies: The Electoral Consequences of Globalization. Comparative Political Studies 40 (3):283–306.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander Zorn, Christopher. 2005. Economic Globalization, the Macro Economy, and Reversals of Welfare: Expansion in Affluent Democracies, 1978–94. International Organization 59 (3):631–662.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., Klemmensen, Robert.. 2006. Welfare to Vote: The Effect of Government Spending on Turnout. Paper Presented at Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 20–23 April.Google Scholar
Honaker, James King, Gary. 2010. What to do About Missing Values in Time Series Cross-Section Data. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):561–581.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare States: Parties and Politics in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2009. Voter Turnout. Available from www.idea.int Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2007. Parline Database. Available from www.ipu.org Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2001. The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, De-Industrialization, and Partisan Politics. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 45–79. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben Cusack, Thomas. 2000. The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization? World Politics 52 (3):313–349.Google Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. 1987. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. American Political Science Review 81 (2):405–423.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A. Brockington, David. 2005. Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries. Journal of Politics 67c (3):825–840.Google Scholar
Kayser, Mark A. Peress, Michael. 2012. Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison. American Political Science Review 106 (3):661–684.Google Scholar
Kiviet, Jan F. 1995. On Bias, Inconsistency, and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1):53–78.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn E. Prescott, Edward C.. 1977. Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy 85 (3):473–492.Google Scholar
Lane, Philip R. Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria. 2007. The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970–2004. Journal of International Economics 73 (2):223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael Garry, John. 2000. Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblang, David Mukherjee, Bumba. 2005. Government Partisanship, Elections, and the Stock Market: Examining American and British Stock Returns, 1930–2000. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):780–802.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review 91 (1):1–14.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoying Liu, Xiaming. 2005. Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: An Increasingly Endogenous Relationship. World Development 33 (3):393–407.Google Scholar
Mahler, Vincent A. 2008. Electoral Turnout and Income Redistribution by the State: A Cross-National Analysis of the Developed Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 47 (2):161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2011. Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in US Elections. American Political Science Review 105 (1):166–188.Google Scholar
Melitz, Marc J. 2003. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica 71 (6):1695–1725.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl O. Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review 95 (4):859–874.Google Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. 1991. Groups in Rational Turnout Models. American Journal of Political Science 35 (3):758–776.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna Singer, David A.. 2008. Taking Stock Seriously: Equity-Market Performance, Government Policy, and Financial Globalization. International Studies Quarterly 52 (2):405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, Stephen. 1981. Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica 49 (6):1417–1426.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. 2002. OECD Economic Outlook 71. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. 2010. OECD Economic Outlook 88. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pandya, Sonal. 2010. Labor Markets and the Demand for Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 64:389–409.Google Scholar
Phillips, Peter C.B. Moon, Hyungsik R.. 2000. Nonstationary Panel Data Analysis: An Overview of Some Recent Developments. Econometric Reviews 19 (3):263–286.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera E. Manow, Philip. 2005. Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory. European Journal of Political Research 44 (2):327–354.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera E. Winner, Hannes. 2009. Why is There No Race to the Bottom in Capital Taxation? International Studies Quarterly 53 (3):761–786.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas Rueda, David. 2008. Inequality as a Source of Political Polarization: A Comparative Analysis of Twelve OECD Countries. In Democracy, Inequality and Representation, edited by Pablo Beramendi and Christopher J. Anderson, 312–353. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas Rueda, David. 2010. The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States. Comparative Political Studies 43 (6):675–705.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):391–414.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin. 1992. The Welfare State, Turnout, and the Economy. American Political Science Review 86 (2):444–456.Google Scholar
Rajan, Raghuram G. Zingales, Luigi. 1998. Financial Dependence and Growth. American Economic Review 88 (3):559–586.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2011. Social Policy by Popular Demand. World Politics 63 (2):271–299.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. American Political Science Review 62 (1):25–42.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Francisco Rodrik, Dani. 2000. Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15:261–325.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy 106 (5):997–1032.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F. Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54:267–292.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F. Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2004. Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4):662–674.Google Scholar
Steiner, Nils D. 2010. Economic Globalization and Voter Turnout in Established Democracies. Electoral Studies 29 (3):1–16.Google Scholar
Steiner, Nils D. Martin, Christian W.. 2012. Economic Integration, Party Polarisation and Electoral Turnout: Testing for a Causal Chain. West European Politics 35 (2):238–265.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Political Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2005. Globalisation, Domestic Politics, and Welfare State Retrenchment in Capitalist Democracies. Social Policy and Society 4 (2):183–195.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2009. World Investment Report. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2009. ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 Countries Between 1960 and 2007. Available at http://www.uva-aias.net/208 Google Scholar
Vowles, Jack. 2008. Does Globalization Affect Public Perceptions of ‘Who in Power Can Make a Difference’? Evidence from 40 Countries, 1996–2006. Electoral Studies 27 (1):63–76.Google Scholar
Walter, Stephanie. 2010. Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly 54 (2):403–426.Google Scholar
Ward, Hugh, Ezrow, Lawrence Dorussen, Han. 2011. Globalization, Party Positions, and the Median Voter. World Politics 63 (3):509–547.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2006. Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles, and Social Spending in the Developing World. International Organization 60 (2):433–468.Google Scholar
Wood, Adrian. 1994. North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2010. World Development Indicators. World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 252.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 16.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 42.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 2.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 199.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 100.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 22.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 421 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 393.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Marshall and Fisher Supplementary Material(File)
File 393.4 KB